I voted for the RN fighting for Malta whatever. Understand that Malta was a vital part of the UK’s efforts to interrupt supplies to N Africa and so defend the Suez canal and thus the UK’s whole middle east position. I am presuming this was understood at the time - but that’s an assumption others may challenge.
German Navy improvements
-
Which German Navy would you like to go to war with England with?
-
Some strange choices…
200 Operational U-boats would wreck UK in 39’
The 3 BB’s and 8 CA’s probably second.
600 planes would be a waste, only one carrier nearing production…so these would be land based.
-
I would say Subs too, Worsham.
Even with the addition of a handful more capital or pocket ships Germany could never have competed with the UK’s surface fleet, but more Subs would have made a huge difference early on. -
@ABWorsham:
Which German Navy would you like to go to war with England with?
The 200 U-boat answer comes closest to what I’d want, but if I recall correctly Admiral Doenitz had argued that he needed 300 operational boats to bring Britain to its knees. 300 sounds like a lot, but bear in mind that only one-third could ever be on full combat deployment in their operational zones at any one time; another third would be travelling from or towards their bases at the start or end of their patrols, while the remaining third of the boats (and crews) would be in port undergoing refit and repair (and rest and recreation).
-
What about ACC’s?
Wouldn’t those have been the difference?
-
Where would you have used them Garg? I can see they could have been used to take out Gib and then get in the Med, take Malta and go for Egypt and the Asian oil. Wouldn’t the UK have countered with all they had, especially if Italy continued to fear using its fleet too far from the safer central Med?
Not sure how practical Carriers would have been and how easy it would have been to sail them past the UK. They might have ended up hiding unused in Norwegian fjords like the Tirpitz. -
Theoretical a mix of all options would have served best.
–---------------------------------------------------------------------------I think two medium Aircraft Carriers would have had an imense impact on the Battlefield of the Atlantic and the Med´s. German Aircraft carriers with a old of 25-30 Planes.
The British focus would have been on the CV´s first to even get through to the Subs.
CV´s proved to provide a bigger threat rather then Battleships but needed a bigger household and logistic.
For German use, all they had to do is to patrol up and down from the E-Channel down to Gibraltar.
Gibraltar taken with a swift blow of the Fallschirmjägers, Airsupport and Naval Support ,as soon as the first German CV is on duty.
Italien support would have been a must.This could be a possibilty only, If Germany decided not to engage in an Airbattle over England.
If Germany only had like 100 to 150 operational Subs combined with enough Airsupport in coastal area would allready create a greater diffrence to the Atlantic Battlefield I think.
(in CV´s converted, Thank you) -
A German Aircraft Carrier could have dealt the British a good many problems had the carrier been able to get into the South Atlantic or Indian Ocean. The Germans could have mined any port of choice.
-
No doubt ABWorsham ,the Germans underestimated the Potential of a CV at all.
The Zeppelin would have been a huge AC considering it would have been finished to be build, but:a.) Staff needed to be on the same page on how to use an CV and where.(German Naval Command was split into surface and under the surface commands)
b.) The Kriegsmarine needed their own Airforce in command.(in CV´s converted, thank you)
-
AC’s proved to provide a bigger threat rather then Battleships but needed a bigger household and logistic.
How can Air Conditioners be a threat? England is too cold anyway so no need for Central Air.
You must mean CV’s…the proper abbreviation for Carrier.
And this ACC thing is a collegiate sports division. Atlantic Coast Conference ( ACC) is no and i repeat no threat to the British.
-
That was a rude and unnecessary post, Imperious Leader. We all respect each other here on the WW2 thread and do not insult other members.
-
I could say what the heck is an A/C? but i know what they are already.
Plus the poster edited it and thanked me, so not an insult by any means.
(in CV�s converted, thank you)
Perhaps you might first read the posts rather than defending nobody who was insulted?
-
I hope it wasn’t meant insultingly, or to embarrass Aequitas et Veritas. He posts here often and obviously has an interest here. I like what he has to say and am sure I am not the only one.
-
The Germans wouldn’t have called it CV or AC anyway.
-
I believe you could have sunk it with one torpedo, whatever it was called, Herr KaLeun.
-
Probably not. It took a bit more effort than that to sink the only carrier the Germans launched during the war. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_aircraft_carrier_Graf_Zeppelin.
-
Can someone tell me if this is the correct spelling of ImbeciLe?
Had a Nazi carrier been loose in the atlantic instead of the Bismarck or both…
What a great book that would have made.
-
I did not know the work on the Carrier was that far advanced. I thought it was just a concept.
-
The Graf Zeppelin was really a light carrier or CVL. It didn’t have a high plane capacity and would need freedom to operate in open waters from bases in France. I bet it would have been sunk within the week of it’s operation.
-
A German Navy Air Force could have escorted U-Boats, protecting the departing and returning Boats in the North Sea and Bay of Biscay. In 1943 the Bay of Biscay became a turkey shoot for Allied aircraft on U-Boats.
Suggested Topics
