@surfer sure that sounds good to me. I will always take free IPC although i would much rather have my transport in sz 106. maybe we can think of it as a free hit on your sub lol
League General Discussion Thread
-
Remind me in a kind way, when I forget and bring it up again, I mean
-
@simon33 you’re right, I know
It’s a bit inconvenient but we have workarounds when necessary -
Maybe a note in the league rules for how to deal with this limitation, then I don’t think I would have to remind you.
-
@gamerman01 let me guess… you got badly diced again by a destroyer in your playoff game?
-
@Arthur-Bomber-Harris said in League General Discussion Thread:
@gamerman01 let me guess… you got badly diced again by a destroyer in your playoff game?
No but I am getting diced so hard there
It hasn’t stopped. But Midway could make it all moot. Or make me give up A&A for a year. Both are possible -
P Panther forked this topic
-
Update
Reverse Midway happened, so won’t be giving up A&A for a year at this time.
Lot of fighting to go, @pacifiersboard playing very tough, and a peek at his other first round game says he’s playing great there too
-
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
…
Reverse Midway happened, so won’t be giving up A&A for a year at this time.
…🎉
-
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
t would be a big improvement if the engine would, when enemy destroyers are present, roll the subs separately but NOT require a casualty choice before rolling all else.
Then let player choose the appropriate casualties, that is, a ship hit or sunk for each sub hitIn case you’re not aware of it, you can fight battles in edit and pick casualties the way you would in person. Dice rolls still show up in History.
Idk if it’d help in this case or not but it’s a nice option to know about.
-
@gamerman01 When you edit the League Rules post can you maybe point out what you edited. I realize it may just be grammar or something, but I can’t tell what changes are made and it would be nice to know :)
-
@Stucifer great idea, I’ll try to remember
It was the addition of naval combat in triplea that I will probably be editing again after checking barnee s point
-
@barnee I really appreciate the new information
So I tried running a battle while in edit mode, and I noticed two things.
#1 It doesn’t auto-pick casualties for you and it also does not put a cap on (I could select 10 losses when there were only 9 hits) so that is perilous
#2 Triple A calls it “hits from first strike units” and that is the whole problem. Destroyers negate first strike capabilities of submarines.Casualties are still demanded by Triple A prematurely, in edit mode also.
Again, thank you for the new information and new thing to try out, but we do still have the same problem.
-
Right on. Wasn’t sure if it would or not. Triplea will give you the dice rolls and hits but you have to select the hits manually. You can select as many as there are units. All or none.
So, Idk if you can ignore early hits and add them at a later stage, if that would work or not for the issue.
At any rate, it requires one to be deliberate while using it :)
-
@barnee @gamerman01
I have used edit mode during a battle with subs before in a league game, if you are methodical, you select 0 casualties with the subs and then post the game save after the next dice rolls -Then your opponent can see the dice in the game summary (and/or their MARTI email if they are so inclined), give OOL, and then you boot up the save and select the casualties and continue the battle.
If there’s a mistake at some point with casualty selection, if you’re posting the save file multiple times it should be “not-too-difficult”—albeit possibly annoying & frustrating—to go back to a specific round and redo the battle from there.
-
@barnee said in League General Discussion Thread:
Right on. Wasn’t sure if it would or not. Triplea will give you the dice rolls and hits but you have to select the hits manually. You can select as many as there are units. All or none.
So, Idk if you can ignore early hits and add them at a later stage, if that would work or not for the issue.
At any rate, it requires one to be deliberate while using it :)
Yeah, I didn’t really get my thought through on that post - it is indeed nice to know the edit mode will not auto pick and that you select them from zero (casualties)
To answer your question, the screen shot was in edit mode so you can’t ignore them. I failed to clearly communicate that shot was from edit mode
-
Thanks for posting Stu, that is amazing
If I had my way I’d roll all battles that require more than one line (1’s, 2’s etc) on the forum because it’s how you play face to face. You see how many you hit from your 1s, then your 2s… and if you roll 50 then you see like 10 at a time…
Seeing all 25 of my fleet attack roll pop up in red and black all at once is pretty stressful
-
So pay attention guys, Stucifers method may be one you prefer.
-
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
the screen shot was in edit mode so you can’t ignore them. I failed to clearly communicate that shot was from edit mode
Well not following here but that’s ok :) If you hit “OK” in the screenshot, it will select zero casualties and move to the next step. Then you would essentially have 1 hit in the bank for future use that you would need to remember.
Anyway, sounds as if Stucifer has a good work around :)
-
@barnee said in League General Discussion Thread:
If you hit “OK” in the screenshot, it will select zero casualties and move to the next step. Then you would essentially have 1 hit in the bank for future use that you would need to remember.
Exactly what I was trying to say, but with more clarity. Thanks! Posting the turn summary & save also means it is easy to track in case your opponent cannot give OOL immediately, which is usually the case.
I’ve seen most people do this already for big battles, so the only “extra” step is putting edit mode on first! 🤓
-
OK, that’s big. Thanks for patiently working it through with me.
After I get a chance to try this method a time or two and assuming I love it, I’ll be spreading the word
-
@gamerman01 if you want we can run a mock battle here