@oysteilo said in League General Discussion Thread:
It’s not that bad if you allowed one game pr top tier player against a low/unranked player. I think it can be a neet addition
Regarding the discussion about ranking systems. Occhams razor is always a good principle. Keep things as simple as possible.
Thanks surfer, thanks trulpen
Somebody needs to kill Karl
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 Enough talk! KILL!
Lol. We could do a rematch.
@jim010 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 Enough talk! KILL!
Lol. We could do a rematch.
Ha, got 2 games going and maybe a third coming online… so, I will circle back once the situation has stabilized.
@Karl7 Maybe by then one of my games will finish as well and I can see what a top tier game looks like first-hand :smirk:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 Enough talk! KILL!
Lol. We could do a rematch.
Ha, got 2 games going and maybe a third coming online… so, I will circle back once the situation has stabilized.
Not the psychosomatic thrilla-killa then? 3 games sound a bit on the low, careful side. ;)
@trulpen said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 Enough talk! KILL!
Lol. We could do a rematch.
Ha, got 2 games going and maybe a third coming online… so, I will circle back once the situation has stabilized.
Not the psychosomatic thrilla-killa then? 3 games sound a bit on the low, careful side. ;)
I am famous for getting over committed to like 5+ games and then losing a bunch because I can’t keep track of what’s going on!
I just finished a few, but still have 13 simultaneous ones going. I agree. It’s not good.
You wanna play me? :grin:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@trulpen said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 Enough talk! KILL!
Lol. We could do a rematch.
Ha, got 2 games going and maybe a third coming online… so, I will circle back once the situation has stabilized.
Not the psychosomatic thrilla-killa then? 3 games sound a bit on the low, careful side. ;)
I am famous for getting over committed to like 5+ games and then losing a bunch because I can’t keep track of what’s going on!
I don’t want anymore than 3 either, and that is too much. I have alot of online work I have to do.
@trulpen said in League General Discussion Thread:
You wanna play me? :grin:
Once one of my games ends, I will hit you and Jim010 up. Prepare.
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@trulpen said in League General Discussion Thread:
You wanna play me? :grin:
Once one of my games ends, I will hit you and Jim010 up. Prepare.
I’m prepared.
This is going to be UGGGGGLYYY!!
Kill Kill!!
It’s going to be worse. It’s going to be a slaughtering humiliation. Not explicit who…
@AndrewAAGamer said in League General Discussion Thread:
Not sure, but as I remember it was majikforce who discussed playing other players and how it hurt his record.
For me now that I know there is a friendly area to play n to help players get better I am content with the League as is. trulpen and I are doing a Tutor game and I expect to do at least 2-3 of those a year for those interested. In fact our first one is just beginning! CHECK IT OUT!!!
Just for the record I don’t recall ever complaining about my rank. It really doesn’t matter to me. I know full well what my rank is and where I fit in this league. I waffle between tier 1 and E depending on my brain capacity that day:laughing: I know what players I can beat and what players I have can have a pretty even match with and what players kick my ass! (looking at you AD!) So my ranking is just a number. I enjoy playing new players to help them get up to speed and hopefully enrich the league play. Sometimes it burns me (ie trulpen and andrewgamer beating me as 3’s) but that’s okay. It just shows their skill level and my lack of skill in an area. All for the better. As for the ranking system I think it works great for this league and is a proven system (thanks for all you do gamerman, greatly appreciated) Some people will just always be a certain level player no matter who they play, some will grow to be better players, some will not. It takes a chunk of time and commitment to play this game and maybe the higher level players just don’t want to invest in that to beat up on some lower tier player. It may not even help that player to get stomped by an M. To have a balanced league the higher tiers should have somewhat of a responsibility to improve game play with their knowledge. But not at the cost of taking the fun out of the game. Just my thoughts. Great people, great league, great game! Bombs away.
@trulpen said in League General Discussion Thread:
Not fully certain, but I believe that majikforce isn’t the one. He has previously explicitly stated that he doesn’t care about his rating and is happy to play newcomers to help them get aqcuainted with the league.
My brain is not all fried then from A-D’s cruel treatments…
Words of wisdom, thanks majik
Just to make sure you know - you have 3 points for your game with trulpen because he is tier E - your current PPG always reflects the current standing of all your past opponents, so it doesn’t matter if you played someone when they were a 3 if they later rose to their true abilities, you get credit for that. In fact, you don’t have any scores less than 3 because you haven’t lost to anyone below a tier E this year.
----Announcement—
I’ve been pretty much away for awhile, just moderating the league and not playing games, until the past week. Now I’m playing a league game again and updating rankings daily.
I just want to remind everyone that the league rules totally allow variants of the OOB game - please see quoted rules below. A new variant is being released (not 100% finalized yet, but is available to all) called “Path to Victory” by Regularkid, Adam514, et al. I just want to assure everyone that you are free to play this version in league play. Thread for the game is here https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/35324/ww2-path-to-victory-feedback-thread
“4 - Game & rules - The default rules are the published G40 2nd edition rules, Regular Dice (also known as ADS or Actual Dice Server), No Technology, and Bidding to determine sides.
…
4a The default game rules may be modified by agreement of both players. Low Luck or Tech, with or without Tech Tokens, is allowed if you and your opponent agree prior to bidding. Balanced mod (see stickied League section thread for Balanced Mod rules) or any other ruleset using G40 is likewise allowed if agreed by players”
The map, especially Russia and Asia and the Pacific, is substantially changed from the OOB game board map, so for most of us, I don’t think switching back and forth between the games would be easy. (Besides the map, enough other improvements, changes, that I think most will want to focus on playing one or the other) I have not play tested the new game yet, I just found out about it today, but after looking at it for a few minutes, it definitely has my recommendation. I’m not encouraging everyone to switch over or everyone to stay with Balanced Mod original map - I don’t care if half the league is playing one and half the previous. But I suspect the new Path to Victory version will quickly become the rage.
