1942.2 House Rules

[baron Münchhausen]

@arwaker:

Lately we played a few games of 1942 second edition after a long while.
We were not so happy with the very scripted decisions players are bound to, to do the perfect opening. Games always are played very similar. Not enough variety.

We did some thinking, discussed a lot, and finally wrote down this set of rules that we hope improves our gaming experience. We played it once since then, and it was quite fun. Now, as we are far from being pros, we thought it would help to improve balancing, if we ask others about their opinion. Maybe they even like our ideas. And if not, they could at least tell us their opinion about the balance, and how we could improve it.

Three groups of changes: Victory City, Setup, Units

We are curious for your opinion. We enjoyed it a lot and will definitevely keep playing and improving it.

I really like the cost reduced of Cruiser and Battleship. I was amongst the first to promote such cost redux to balance Cruiser.

Why bother to increase the cost of Carrier? Is it that important for balance?
What cases made your mind to give +1 IPC to an already weak 1942.2 Carrier A1 D2 M2 C14 compared to G40 Carrier A0 D2 M2 C16 2 hits?

Do you believe it can be balanced to use OOB set-up with your 1,2,3 pts VCs?

[Caesar-Seriona]

I believe Washington DC and LA should be worth 5 points, not 3 and my justification for this is regardless of which Axis and Allies version you play, USA being invaded is going to be the most unlikely situation to happen even if the US plays “bad” so you should increase the value of controlling US cities for victory condition. With it remaining 3 on par with Moscow, I would rather invade Moscow.

[Corpo24]

Hey Baron,
I just finished a game with your set up.  It played really nice and it was a close game.  The allies eventually won due to some amazing rolls by the Russians at the battle of Moscow.  Anyways great job!

[baron Münchhausen]

Not mine.
It is arwaker set-up.
:-D

[Corpo24]

Doh!  lol. Great set up arwaker! It was really fun :)

[innohub]

Wow.  Just notice this.  Would be great if this is available on TripleA so I can find some buddy to play test more.

[baron Münchhausen]

@innohub:

Wow.  Just notice this.  Would be great if this is available on TripleA so I can find some buddy to play test more.

You can edit your set-up via EDIT mode. Then save this game with a specific name.

For a few modified units,  you have to wait we are on this project of creating a whole lot of options to select according to your taste for G40, then 1942.2.

[General 6 Stars]

I’m thinking about putting these 42 Victory Point conditions in my 40 game. But not change any setup.

I like how Germany doesn’t have to take London or Moscow to win. I may have to tweak it if its to easy for the Axis.

Thanks

[simon33]

I don’t like the idea of allowing a factory producing 2 units on a 1IPC territory. I don’t think Axis have much chance with these changes. I don’t see the need for change?

However, I do like downgrading the SZ37 BB to a Cruiser. I’ve argued for that before.

[arwaker]

After a year break we played a game according to these rules yesterday.
Japan heavy navy focused getting Honolulu, Sydney, Rio de Janero and even San Francisco! Leading to a land war on the American continent.
Meanwhile Russia and Britain heavy focusing Germany, with conquering the whole of northern and eastern Europe (Oslo, Kiev).
But then, Germany seized an opportunity of taking London after Britain player overcomitted and did some bad rolls.
Axis win the game.

It was very confusing, and we did a lot of bad mistakes. But it was fun, and we really had a game with battles at totally new battlefields.

• After Russia and Britain both starting very defensive, Germany and Japan player decided to play an altrenative strategy, attacking US. It worked at least partially.
• Germany forced to play defensive on land, losing total whole of east and north Europe (but defensive Russia took quite a while).
• Japan using heavy Navy and invading Australia, South America and finally even US west coast.
• Land war on the American continent between Japan West coast and US East coast (and Canada a bit).
• Few action in China at all…all players were turteling after the initial clashes. Money was needed elsewhere and infantry could hardly attack alone.
• Tank war in Africa between German Egypt and British South Africa. Both players had minor factories in africa, pumping tanks.
• Great navy clash in the northern Atlantic between US+Royal Navy and the German navy.
• To some bad rolls, British and US player losing atlantic fleet. Germany lost as well nearly whole fleet, but was able to invade exposed London and win the game.
• Maybe one turn later, the Russian steamroller would have taken Berlin.

The changes in Navy Balance (increase offensive power by chaper Battleship and Cruiser) as well as the alternative start setup allows for totally new strategies like “Kill US”. We are still not sure if this setup is balanced, we did only 3 games with this so far. I’d be happy about any feedback.