@wizmark Nope, enjoy your easy kills
2015 League Post Game Results Here
-
LoL. I am elite for the time being :evil:
I know it won’t last probably, but still :P. Can I take a vacation till the end of the year :D?
Absolutely. That’s what Juan is doing so far :lol:
-
@Shin:
Even I’m Tier 2 now!
No way is this gonna last. I predict a dynamic few weeks ahead for lots of people.
Keep in mind that with the introduction of tier E, everyone on average has a bit higher PPG as compared to 2014. I see tier 3 and 4 are a bit thinner than before
-
I noticed that too. I think if you want to keep Elite status, you will need to amend (up) the points necessary to be one. The one point gap for each Tier worked fine with 4 Tiers; I am not sure it does for 5. Sorry!
-
Yeah, it still works.
Elite doesn’t mean very few will be in it - I needed a tier that was higher than #1. #0 just doesn’t cut it. What’s better than #1? Elite.
-
I agree with your point, and did think briefly about changing the cutoffs, but I’m pretty sure the majority of players enjoy the “grade inflation”
A “C” in school just isn’t “average” anymore…… a “B” is… :lol:
So tier 2 is the new tier 3, I guess you could say
-
I remember the squawking about the negative points for losses, even though it was really exactly the same effect as we have now…… :-D
-
mrcunego(Axis) wins over bonusbent(Allies)
-
wheatbeer (axis – of course) just ended my substantial winning streak:
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=34802.390
very well played. he’s certainly under-rated so far this season (like me, he had a bad start to the season).
this was quite the epic game, going to round 27…i thought i had a really good game going, but he made some clever maneuvers that i ultimately fell for (his japan play is annoyingly clever)
hey, if you think losing moscow is bad, try losing it TWICE in one game!
-
bonusbent (axis) gives majikforce a butt whooping! Welcome to the league!
[urlhttp://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=35191.0] -
wheatbeer (axis – of course) just ended my substantial winning streak:
very well played. he’s certainly under-rated so far this season (like me, he had a bad start to the season).
Oh, for sure. He just hasn’t had many game results the past few months that would correct it. Here’s one though! :-)
-
wheatbeer (axis – of course) just ended my substantial winning streak:
very well played. he’s certainly under-rated so far this season (like me, he had a bad start to the season).
Oh, for sure. He just hasn’t had many game results the past few months that would correct it. Here’s one though! :-)
Well, he got sucked into WaW…
-
I have some more losses in the pipeline … so I dunno if I’ll make it to tier E … Maybe next season :lol:
-
Well, all’s right with the world now that you’re back to tier 1 with a 3.86. All losses have been to tier E’s - no shame in that
-
dawgoneit (Allies +12) over Entek
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=35385.90 -
Balladeer (axis) defeats ArtofWar (allies+14).
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?action=post;topic=35311.105
-
Shin Ji Axis over Karl7 Allies
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=35510.135
THIS:
Battle in 96 Sea Zone
British attack with 1 cruiser, 1 fighter and 1 transport
Italians defend with 1 destroyer and 1 transport
1 transport owned by the British retreated to 98 Sea Zone
Italians win with 1 destroyer and 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is -22
Casualties for British: 1 cruiser and 1 fighter
Battle in 97 Sea Zone
British attack with 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 1 cruiser, 1 destroyer, 2 fighters and 1 submarine
Germans defend with 1 tactical_bomber; Italians defend with 1 battleship, 1 cruiser, 2 fighters and 1 transport
Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the Italians
Units damaged: 1 carrier owned by the British
Italians win with 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is -11
Casualties for Germans: 1 tactical_bomber
Casualties for British: 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 1 cruiser, 1 destroyer, 2 fighters and 1 submarine
Casualties for Italians: 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 2 fightersAllowed Italy to capture Egypt It1. Unbelievable. The allies rallied to crush Japan but couldn’t reroute to Europe quick enough to save Moscow from Germany’s dozens of bombers.
:cry: :cry: :cry:
-
how many times are you guys gonna lose to each other :lol:
Shin Ji Axis over Karl7 Allies
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=35510.135
THIS:
Battle in 96 Sea Zone
British attack with 1 cruiser, 1 fighter and 1 transport
Italians defend with 1 destroyer and 1 transport
1 transport owned by the British retreated to 98 Sea Zone
Italians win with 1 destroyer and 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is -22
Casualties for British: 1 cruiser and 1 fighter
Battle in 97 Sea Zone
British attack with 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 1 cruiser, 1 destroyer, 2 fighters and 1 submarine
Germans defend with 1 tactical_bomber; Italians defend with 1 battleship, 1 cruiser, 2 fighters and 1 transport
Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the Italians
Units damaged: 1 carrier owned by the British
Italians win with 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is -11
Casualties for Germans: 1 tactical_bomber
Casualties for British: 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 1 cruiser, 1 destroyer, 2 fighters and 1 submarine
Casualties for Italians: 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 2 fightersAllowed Italy to capture Egypt It1. Unbelievable. The allies rallied to crush Japan but couldn’t reroute to Europe quick enough to save Moscow from Germany’s dozens of bombers.
:cry: :cry: :cry:
-
how many times are you guys gonna lose to each other :lol:
Shin Ji Axis over Karl7 Allies
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=35510.135
THIS:
Battle in 96 Sea Zone
British attack with 1 cruiser, 1 fighter and 1 transport
Italians defend with 1 destroyer and 1 transport
1 transport owned by the British retreated to 98 Sea Zone
Italians win with 1 destroyer and 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is -22
Casualties for British: 1 cruiser and 1 fighter
Battle in 97 Sea Zone
British attack with 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 1 cruiser, 1 destroyer, 2 fighters and 1 submarine
Germans defend with 1 tactical_bomber; Italians defend with 1 battleship, 1 cruiser, 2 fighters and 1 transport
Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the Italians
Units damaged: 1 carrier owned by the British
Italians win with 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is -11
Casualties for Germans: 1 tactical_bomber
Casualties for British: 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 1 cruiser, 1 destroyer, 2 fighters and 1 submarine
Casualties for Italians: 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 2 fightersAllowed Italy to capture Egypt It1. Unbelievable. The allies rallied to crush Japan but couldn’t reroute to Europe quick enough to save Moscow from Germany’s dozens of bombers.
:cry: :cry: :cry:
Until someone literally dies at his computer….
-
Most likely of a stress-induced heart attack. :-D
All of our games have been white knuckle jobs for real.
-
bmnielsen (aka bomberman) over axis-dominion
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=35062.new;topicseen#new
when i lose as allies, it’s usually after 20-30 rounds……when i lose as allies against this ridiculous all-bomber german strategy, i lose within 10 rounds. what am i to do when faced with 27 bombers that threaten everywhere?
one thing’s for sure, at least in my mind, KJF doesn’t seem to work, as a good Japan can easily hold off while the euro axis overrun everything.
Suggested Topics
