Oztea also has a 1942 setup
https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/20575/oztea-s-1942-global-setup
Global 1940 French Rebalance
-
Me too.
And due to my limited information, I can’t understand how those rules solve your problem.
-
That can work. Maybe too many French units though?
-
Then reduce inf. Test it best way. Maybe Simon has an opinion yet.
With 3-4 guys and 12 icps for Paris may not need a bid.
Should of been fixed in first place so no bid but IMO. -
You guys don’t see the problem? I don’t know how I can explain it any clearer.
-
@simon33 said in Global 1940 Parisian Rebalance:
You guys don’t see the problem? I don’t know how I can explain it any clearer.
Ok. I don’t see it. Then maybe I do.
Later -
I don’t see how creating a quasi-Vichy France will allow the US to continue producing units even if Paris is liberated.
Please elaborate on your rules.
-
Maybe this would help. Lol
-
-
@superbattleshipyamato said in Global 1940 Parisian Rebalance:
I don’t see how creating a quasi-Vichy France will allow the US to continue producing units even if Paris is liberated.
Please elaborate on your rules.
Well, if/when USA lands on Normandy, assuming it can hold it with UK help, it can start producing units there. It can then build up a little and maybe take Southern France also. What it can’t do is proceed to Paris because then USA can no longer produce units in Normandy. Also, being next door to Germany’s major factory is a somewhat higher bar to defend than being next door to the minor factory in Paris which is a candidate for strategic bombing. So there are scenarios where trading Paris would be attractive for the allies but because it stops USA from producing units this does not occur.
-
@superbattleshipyamato said in Global 1940 Parisian Rebalance:
Is that a custom map? Any more explanation?
Or is that what simon33 posted?
It’s my custom map. It was kinda of a joke where if allies land they can hold and build.
But I’ll remove if need be. -
Why can’t US build units in Normandy if they move out ? They have a minor factory there.
Reason for the free French units is what I meant by my suggestion may help allies hold Normandy. But seems u want something different. If u do Vichy then it should be for all French territories and not just 1 or 2. But
-
@general-6-stars said in Global 1940 Parisian Rebalance:
Why can’t US build units in Normandy if they move out ? They have a minor factory there.
If they liberate France then all Allied controlled originally French TTys revert to French control. Better to leave France be so you can keep using the Factory.
-
@barnee said in Global 1940 Parisian Rebalance:
@general-6-stars said in Global 1940 Parisian Rebalance:
Why can’t US build units in Normandy if they move out ? They have a minor factory there.
If they liberate France then all Allied controlled originally French TTys revert to French control. Better to leave France be so you can keep using the Factory.
Ya I get that. Hold it. If game unbalanced as they say then give them free inf to help hold and bomb the crap out of Paris.
-
It already does that but it isn’t enough.
-
So you want a bigger bonus for liberating France? Got it.
-
I wouldn’t say a bigger one off bonus but a removal of the ongoing penalty for trading paris.
I suppose you can argue that the allies can’t trade London or India oob but this weakness is already resolved in bm so the next thing to fix is the Paris problem.
-
What’s BM?
-
Balanced Mod.
-
Thank you!
-
Am considering a version 2 of this game, with 5 changes
- guerrilla fighters turned off by default
- reverting to 6IPC for the China objective
- Where a CV purchase has been depended on for an attack, it must be mobilised where it was needed (player enforced)
- Okinawa+Iwo Jima objective turned off by default
- add 1 Anzac sub in SZ62
Any comments?
edit: added the second then third change
-
B barnee referenced this topic on
Suggested Topics
