Why is it interesting you got a damaged package from Amazon?
:evil:
@gamerman01 Thanks for the quick reply!
Hello A&A community, quick question about a specific scenario that I cannot find clarity on in the rulebook. Playing G40, US attacks SZ 95 where Italian navy and German U-Boats are located. I know that U-Boats can submerge as US Navy has no destroyers. But here’s where I am lost … If I submerge the U-Boats which would mean certain destruction of the Italian navy there, then UK Navy move to SZ 95 for an attack which includes destroyers, would the German U-Boats (combined with scrambling Luftwaffe from Southern Italy) be defending against the UK navy and the US navy boats that are there or just the UK navy which is attacking on its turn?? The answer is crucial for my current game as we are playing with Captain’s house rules where U-Boats are lethal.
@Trout - On UKs turn, only the UK ships are attacking. Any US ships in the sea zone are ignored in such an attack, on UKs turn.
@matttodd1 Got it. Thanks for the prompt reply!
If an unfriendly neutral is attacked but not conquered, I’m pretty sure that enemy air units may land in it without enemy land units to activate it. However, I’ve had a look and I can’t see where that is clearly stated in the rules - seems implied but is that it?
@simon33 said in Global 2nd edition Q+A ( AAG40.2):
If an unfriendly neutral is attacked but not conquered, I’m pretty sure that enemy air units may land in it without enemy land units to activate it.
Correct.
However, I’ve had a look and I can’t see where that is clearly stated in the rules - seems implied but is that it?
It’s just landing in a friendly territory.
Rulebook Europe 1940.2 page 11:
“Unfriendly Neutrals
…
When a neutral territory is invaded, it’s no longer considered
neutral and immediately becomes hostile to the alliance
of the power that attacked it and friendly to the opposing
alliance.
…
If the attack upon the formerly neutral territory is unsuccessful
(the territory is not captured), any remaining defending units
stay in the territory but can’t move. The territory remains
uncontrolled (place a national control marker on it face
down to indicate its new status) but is considered friendly to
powers on the side it’s now allied with. Units belonging to
those powers can move into it and take control of it and its
remaining units in the same way as if it were a friendly neutral.”
That could be more clearly written IMO.
@simon33 Note that while air units on the side of the formerly neutral territory may now land in it, they cannot take control of it. Land units are required for that.
This has probably been asked before but had questions about neutrality restrictions and purchases.
Yes.
It can on the Pacific map, but not on the Europe map (unless also at war with Germany or Italy).
As it cannot declare war until the Collect Income phase, it is still restricted.
Its industrial complexes are upgraded immediately when it enters a state of war, so they can be used on its first turn after another power declares war on it.
G1 - two subs attack SZ 109. UK scrambles 3 fighters into 109 to try to take out the subs.
Germany attacks first and hits - destroyer is removed from board. Lets say UK misses all or one hit - now the battle is over since planes can’t hit subs without destroyer present.
What happens to the UK transport in this situation since there was a scramble? Does it go down with the destroyer or do the scrambled fighters keep it alive?
UK sends transport/destroyer from Canada to SZ 109 and rather than ignore and land troops, destroyer initiates attack with the support of fighters. Lets say subs get a hit, so destroyer is gone. If transport is still alive, are they still barred from offloading (since destroyer gone and no longer escorting) even though sub/s submerged to end scramble battle? Or does the transport go down with the destroyer?
No scramble. Destroyer and sub/s take each other out. What happens to transport?
The transport is lost, as subs remain with no opposition.
Assuming that United Kingdom and Scotland are still held by the UK, the transport should be moving in noncombat movement, so this question is moot. However, if this were an amphibious assault, the transport, being an attacker, would be able to retreat if it survived the first round of combat. Note that if all of the defending subs either submerge or are destroyed, there would be nothing to retreat from.
Nothing, as the battle is over (assuming the transport itself was not hit during the battle).