• In simple terms, the Japanese did not have a concept of Combined Arms because they had no reason for it up to this point. You have to remember that before WWII, the only invasions they ever launched basically in their entire history has a culture was against Korea and Manchuria both which lacked a military when Japan invaded it and the only combat experience at this point in time was a naval war against Russia and a brief land war against Germany so they never needed a situation that required the military might of both branches. The irony here is that the majority of the Japanese Admiralty was trained by the British and UK took Combined Arms very seriously so I have no idea why the Japanese took the hint of it. I think at the end of the day, this can be blamed on the Emperor because Japanese High Command was fight between each other for his will.

  • '21 '20 '18 '17

    Nippon-wa;

    no interservice cooperation
    no shore bombardment support doctrine
    no replacement potential for skilled pilots or crews
    no landing craft of note
    no formal logistics regime or preparations
    no heavy bombers, airplane armor or ss/drop fuel tanks
    no complex engineering (hydraulics, alloys, useful radios, automation, remote control, computers)
    no radar of note
    no secret code integrity
    no plan to defeat the worlds largest economies and militaries all at the same time
    no nearby allies
    no substantial refineries, oil resources, or reserves
    weak knowledge of their adversaries capabilities, technologies and dispositions
    pre-modern battlefield tactics
    outmoded and suicidal warfighting doctrine

    CSA;

    no iron or steel production of note
    no railroads or rolling stock of note
    no allies
    no trading partners to save them
    no independently backed currency or central bank credibility
    no significant natural resources except agricultural ones
    no logical or universal political doctrine
    no unified command of state-based units
    no central political control over taxation or policy
    minimal ability to produce gunpowder, rifles, and cannon
    capital located 100 miles from the capital of the more powerful side
    no plan except to survive until the Union gave up

    WHAT WERE THEY THINKING!?!?!?


  • @taamvan:

    Nippon-wa;

    no interservice cooperation
    no shore bombardment support doctrine
    no replacement potential for skilled pilots or crews
    no landing craft of note
    no formal logistics regime or preparations
    no heavy bombers, airplane armor or ss/drop fuel tanks
    no complex engineering (hydraulics, alloys, useful radios, automation, remote control, computers)
    no radar of note
    no secret code integrity
    no plan to defeat the worlds largest economies and militaries all at the same time
    no nearby allies
    no substantial refineries, oil resources, or reserves
    weak knowledge of their adversaries capabilities, technologies and dispositions
    pre-modern battlefield tactics
    outmoded and suicidal warfighting doctrine

    CSA;

    no iron or steel production of note
    no railroads or rolling stock of note
    no allies
    no trading partners to save them
    no independently backed currency or central bank credibility
    no significant natural resources except agricultural ones
    no logical or universal political doctrine
    no unified command of state-based units
    no central political control over taxation or policy
    minimal ability to produce gunpowder, rifles, and cannon
    capital located 100 miles from the capital of the more powerful side
    no plan except to survive until the Union gave up

    WHAT WERE THEY THINKING!?!?!?

    Sweet ! But you got to much time on your hands  :-D

Suggested Topics

  • 18
  • 9
  • 13
  • 5
  • 3
  • 3
  • 1
  • 31
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

67

Online

17.5k

Users

40.0k

Topics

1.7m

Posts