Let me first off say that I think we agree on this whole issue, I am just playing devil’s advocate to some degree.
@wheatbeer:
@LHoffman:
What do you think the US flag means to the Japanese citizens interned here?
The flag wasn’t raised at that camp as a symbol of hate against the Japanese.
That said… The flag was not raised as a symbol of hate in 1941-45, but that does not mean that Japanese-Americans could not have made that leap themselves. After all, their being put in the camp was based purely on their race/ethnicity and whatever suspicions they may have engendered to the US government. Their internment was not based on hate per se, but it was certainly an act of discrimination. And I think you could get many people today to equate discrimination with racism and therefore hate, even if shrouded in bureaucracy.
Do you have proof that the Confederate Battle Flag or their state flag was raised as a symbol of hate? I am not sure what, if any, country intends very specifically for their flag to be a symbol of anything negative. As you said, it is all what people make of it or how they associate it or what the government explicitly says it means. Otherwise they are just colored shapes.
@wheatbeer:
Many interred Japanese-Americans joined the 442nd infantry and fought under the US flag.
And there were black slaves who fought for the south. Even if conscripted.
@wheatbeer:
I can’t find any evidence that Japanese-Americans then or now commonly (or even uncommonly) found the US flag offensive.
Again, playing devil’s advocate in suggesting that they easily could have. And I am sure some actually did, even if that is but an assumption.
What about the Native Americans who were killed or displaced from their traditional areas of living because of the United States? Same deal.