Yup, that’s the correct spelling. But it is spelled ‘Afganistan’ on the board. Check it http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/362552?size=original
Yup, you’re right, making incorrect corrections is fun : /.
Also, the Egypt territory is just ‘Egypt’, no Anglo.
dante’s right about Czech Hungary not bordering Ukraine, and I think that the other Ukraine territory is ‘Eastern Ukraine’ not ‘Northern Ukraine’. Whatever it is it should border the Russia territory instead of being cut off by Belorussia.
Thanks Dante and 03321, I will correct those in the next one.
I have to say though, I wish a little more attention was paid to the Eastern Europe section of the board. Hungary Czechoslovakia is a comparatively small stretch of land, especially when viewed next to some of these other divisions. You can tell from the shape of the German space that it is meant to include Austria and the Sudetenland, which doesn’t leave room for much else. Poland is just huge, no matter you want look at it. Its definitely exaggerated.
I rather wish that that the Hungary Czechoslovakia space was a more general ‘Central Europe’ space, that included Bohemia and Austria. It would make more sense to me to have a detour space separating Germany from Italy, than the current solution of fuzzy borders along the Swiss Alps and the port of Trieste. Oh well
In any case I will redraw Poland this afternoon, so that the connections follow the board properly. :)
I will also redraft Eastern Ukraine, or whatever its supposed to be, when I do that. I think they should just call it the Don, or the Don river valley, or Kursk. I don’t know though, its hard to say. On my map the Ukraine is already drawn in its entirety and correctly, so to call the rest of it Eastern Ukraine or Northern Ukraine etc, is a little misleading. I hate to get rid of the accurate borders to replace them vague ones, but I think that’s what I might have to do in this area of the map. Belorussia is already pretty far out there, so I guess its not too big of a stretch.
Correcting Afghanistan to the misspelled name does seem a little ridiculous, but we can do that too. It’s gotta be a little embarrassing that it slipped through though, especially since Americans are much more likely to notice, now that we have so many troops on the ground over there. Maybe we should throw them a bone and just fix the error. Up to you guys if we want to include the ‘h’.
As for Larry’s website, I wasn’t able to register or post on those boards, so I just sent an email to the admin. Guess I’ll have to wait see if anything comes of it. Cool link though man, thanks for that.
edit: I will also fix the names in China to agree with the stuff posted in the other thread. It makes me happy to hear that the other Russian space is called ‘Ural’ instead of Omsk, as originally speculated. It makes much more sense this way. I might end up redrawing Novosibirsk in a few spots now. Thanks Krieghund :)
Unit graphics will come next, probably about 50x50 pixels relative the current size of the map, maybe a little/larger or smaller depending. I think the zones should be large enough to handle this with minimal spill over.
These maps really are an excellent cartographic projection. But this is the one thing I’m not sure about. The VC graphic I did is 35x36 and it looks kinda big in places. The actual gameboards have the territories hideously out of proportion. But there’s a reason for it. Territories will have up to 7 different units occupying the space. And that’s before any attacking units are added. ~ZP
p.s. Please don’t misspell Afghanistan to match Larry’s map. :-D
I’m sure what he was showing at GenCon was a one-off proof of the board. If a typo like that makes in into the production piece many heads should roll. ~ZP
These maps really are an excellent cartographic projection. But this is the one thing I’m not sure about. The VC graphic I did is 35x36 and it looks kinda big in places. The actual gameboards have the territories hideously out of proportion. But there’s a reason for it. Territories will have up to 7 different units occupying the space. And that’s before any attacking units are added. ~ZP
Which territories do you think are too small? Perhaps I can beef them up a bit, since this map is already departing from the original design concept in many areas. I could for example blow out Hungary and Czechoslovakia, and the Coastline of Northwestern Europe to fit more units. I could also tweak Mongolia north and shift lake Baikal, if you think the China spaces are going to be an issue. Let me know what you think, and I can retouch the baseline a bit later tonight.
If I was designing a real game board, I would likely expand some of the territories and sea zones to accommodate the much larger plastic units. For now I’m focusing mainly on tripleA, which I’m sure this map will be able to handle, but I do see what you mean. When it comes down to it though, on the game board, all you really need is for the Sea Zones to be large enough to accommodate all the naval units. They are by far the largest, probably even larger than they need to be, but if you can cover them, everything else is pretty simple. The priorities are a little different though depending on the format. On the game board you want big units with all the glorious details (playing army men basically), but on the computer you want a reasonably sized map that can be viewed at a glance, with the size of the units being less critical.
For the current map I’ve privileged the computer format, both because its my preferred method of play, and because I think its the real future of the franchise. I really do believe that a computer/console translation of A&A is the only way we’re ever going to attract a sizable number of young blood players. For the real deal in cardboard though, I would definitely explore some more abstractions, to ensure that all the units fit comfortably, for sure. :)
I also agree about the Afghans. Better to correct the mistake, even if it did make it through the first round of printing.
I’ll hit up your thread on the dev site… ~ZP
OK all how does this feel? I forgot to switch the Northern Ukraine to Eastern Ukraine, but extend it up to Russia. Also switched out the names in China and added some SZ numbers for reference.
I didn’t really tweak out the other territories yet, except to fix the situation with Poland, but I’ll try to see if I can squeeze some more space out of the smaller ones. I will correct the baseline tomorrow, if anyone has some suggestions.
Thanks again for helping me out all. I really appreciate it :)
Burma, Kwangtung, East Indies, Borneo, and New Guinae, I think, should be brown. Philippines should be green. A lot of grey territories in Russia should be red. I think there’s a few more as well.
The colors on the map right now reflect a 1942 set up. When I rework the baseline I’ll recolor everything for 41. Basically I was just lazy on the map key the other night and didn’t want to re-enter all the territory names onto a new 41 map.
Also, I just heard from Dave that Poland is off (the way it borders Hungary Czech). I couldn’t quite make it out from the screenshot, and all the political maps seemed to suggest that Eastern Poland would be the more appropriate choice. The board has Western Poland though, so I’ll fix it to expand the border lines in the appropriate directions. This is one of the rough models I was trying to follow in the original set up. The gameboard is rather different though
And here are some shots of the divisions according to the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact
Ok here’s the tweaked Baseline. I added some meat to Hungary and the Dutch coastline. Fixed the Poland issue, the Sahara, and the territory divisions in the Soviet east. I tried to catch any hanging pixels or breaks in the lines, but another day to double check it never hurts I guess. :)
Also I love the new Players Aid and BattleMaps for AA50. The tiny labels are awesome, nice work guys!
Those are going to be a huge help. If anyone else wants to use this projection when I’m finished for projects like that, feel free to have at it. Here’s a link to the AA50 players aid for those who haven’t seen it yet. Not done by me, though I’d love to get together with the madman behind all that glorious detailing work. :)
Will be back for more tomorrow. Take care all
good. a new picture was posted to help you confirm the sea zones and such at BGG
Black_Elk and Bluestroke:
You each have been awarded the Iron Cross with Oak leaves for your efforts. Its exactly the right type of leadership that somebody can spend all this time to carefully look up information and provide the community such a fascinating player aid. It will now be possible to really make some strategy for the 1941 set ups.
I will start bugging the powers that be to provide set ups for 1942 so we can complete the work you have both begun.
Thanks man :-D
I went ahead and drafted out a quick 1941 style color chart for the new baseline. I left the labels empty though, in case someone with more skills than me wants to take a crack at it. The flag markers that I used for the capitals are part of a set that I made, I have them in medium and tiny sizes too, if anyone else would like to make use of them. Just shoot me an email and I can send you the zip package.
AA50 1941
Baseline
Decided to switch the colors for USA and China on a recommendation :)
Looks awesome Black_elk.
Thanks for your efforts!
It looks great!
For accuracy
Brasilia do not exist in 1940’s years,
Libia it’s italian by 1912 no 1934
And Spain, in Spanish language, is España, not Espana (espana in Spanish sounds as “is for nothing”, pretty ugly :-D ). Press ALT + 1 + 6 +4 for writing a ñ in a non-spanish board
And sure Suomi had some simbol. I think is Süomi or Suömi, you should check.
Now, simply change that ugly green for UK and that ugly limey for USA for a beautiful green for USA and a beautiful limey for UK :-D
All the rest is pretty good. Great job :-)
For accuracy
Brasilia do not exist in 1940’s years
True. Brasilia was built in the late 1950s and became Brazil’s capital in 1960. Before that, Rio de Janeiro was the capital.
Funcioneta, Dante,
I hope you guys aren’t dumping on Black Elk for my mistakes. Black Elk is doing the AA50 Map and I am doing the AA50PlayersAid Map(now R5.)
You can link over in the AA50 fact thread.
comments on the Players Aid map;
item:Dante I have added your corrections to R5 fo AA50PlayersAid Map.
item:Funcioneta-colors I picked Olive Drab for US to reflect US Army colors, sorry you don’t like. I will stay with it for now, it gives me a 1940 WWII color.
Also, Limey green for UK, the British green for UK gave me good contrast to the Neutral territory grays, which gave me problems, when I edited everything-nuff said.
item:Thank you for the information, on Alternate language symbols. I was unaware, I will attempt to add those into map revsion R6.
Overall, Black Elk is the one with more skill and tools. I’m just learning with Microsoft paint, like a five year old with a box of crayons-LOL, drive on.
item:Funcioneta-colors I picked Olive Drab for US to reflect US Army colors, sorry you don’t like. I will stay with it for now, it gives me a 1940 WWII color.
Also, Limey green for UK, the British green for UK gave me good contrast to the Neutral territory grays, which gave me problems, when I edited everything-nuff said.
It’s OK, but I said that not by matter of tastes. Remember that UK pieces will be limey and USA’s pieces will be green. I think it’s better keep both territory and game pieces in the same color or it will be too confusing.
