@Cmdr:
I think we need a President who will do with Israel what FDR did with England before December 7th, 1941. We’ll sell them equipment and stay out of the bloody way and let Israel conquer the middle east once and for all. Israel’s already proven itself capable of defending itself against three major fronts in a matter of weeks. Why do you think terrorism was born? The regular muslim armies had their butts (and Russian equipment) handed to them in the war!
Why would Israel ever conquer the middle east? We shouldnt give a nation weapons to make more wars, we should give them weapons to defend themselves against our mutual enemies. Im still against the idea of Israel as a state and I dont think its creation was a good move, but now that its happened we need to figure out a way to less hostilities towards them. Its much like the situaton in Iraq - going in may have been a bad move, but thats the past and we need to look at the current situation.
I think Israel, at this point, has more of a right to exist where they are then any of the other nations in the area now. If they are conquered, we can talk about them having lost that right. However, the ultimate definition of a right to exist as a nation is if you can adequately defend yourself from invasion. If America would get out of the way, they would be more able to defend themselves, not less.
I dont think there should be a definiton for a countries right to exist. If it has borders and most of the world recognizes them, they are country. I wouldnt say Israel has more of a right to be there than any other coutnry in the middle east.
We need a President who understands that and will do it. We also need a president who will move the US Embassy to Jerusalem instead of some backwater town. Everyone else has their embassies there, that’s where business is conducted, that’s where we should be too.
Wheres the embassy now? I always assumed it was in Jerusalem, its kind of silly that it isnt.
As for Iraq. The Sunnis and Shi’ites want us there. The Kurds are coming our way too. Pulling out now would be horrible! We’d be snatching defeat in the war on terror from the jaws of victory! Though, we do need to start convincing the locals that they should go to their own government to solve their problems, not American officers. Currently our officers are acting like local magistrates and project managers to reconstruct the nation. That’s not really their job. But while the dust settles and the last few pockets of resistance are destroyed, they are doing the job and doing it well.
Again, I dont agree with us being there in the first place, but now that we’re in we have to do this right. Set a timetable for withdrawl that cannot be taken back under any circumstances (or perhaps that could be taken back but only under a unanimous vote from senate). If we dont leave under conditions like this, Iraq will continue to demand US support. Setting up a timetable makes them get their shit in line and run their country.
That’s how the Islamic world views the American women, especially Mrs. Clinton. That’s not a position of respect. As such, Hillary will find it almost impossible to negotiate and, therefore, we may see an increase in recruiting efforts by the enemies of democracy and America with greater success if she is elected.
Radical Islam has no respect for any woman, Hilary is no different.
I also believe that the candidate most terrorists would like to see nominated would be McCain. The longer the USA stay in the middle east, the more fuel terrorists have against us, ‘the infidels’, who are in their land.
As for Barry (Barrack Hussein Obama), he refuses to answer questions as to whether or not he has any nostalgia for islam or for his islamic roots. If he cannot answer a simple question like that, how can we trust him to do more then wag a finger and call for change?
I feel like saying that last sentence is a bit unfair. If he were to come out and say that he respects his Islamic heritage, everyone would criticize him for either bringing religion into the campaign or they wouldnt trust him with the enemy. If he denies it, people would say he cant stick up for himself. Apparently saying nothing at all means we cant trust him. Ugh.
I won’t slam him for his present votes in Illinois. It’s standard practice here to vote present if you neither agree nor disagree with the proposed plan, but rather want to try and refine it a bit more. Most of the country is unaware of that, and I’m sure in the other 49 states, it will be used against him.
Agreed, I cant attack him for voting present. Its also true that the average american thinks that means he cant make up his mind or hes indecisive.