@CWO:
@Zhukov44:
The first 90 minutes of “Thin Red Line” is pretty much the best war movie I’ve ever seen. However, after they finally storm and take the Japanese camp (possibly the best scene in the film) the movie begins to meander.
Is this the 1964 or the 1998 version of the film? I’ve never seen the 1964 one, but I own the 1998 version (which came as part of a package of three movies I bought). I did my best to get through it, but after about 25 minutes (which felt more like two hours) I couldn’t take it anymore: I thought the film had no focus, no movement, no story, and no apparent idea of what it was trying to do. I later looked at the user reviews for it on the Internet Movie Database and saw that comments about this film are very polarized, with people regarding it either as a masterpiece or a cinematic disaster. Maybe it’s a bit of both, to have attracted so many divergent opinions. In my case I have to agree with the E.W. critic who called the film “too paralyzingly high-minded to connect with audiences.”
I lived with about 4 other people back around 2000, and we watched the 98 one and Saving Private Ryan. I like both for different reasons, but feel SPR is the better movie, but my roommates (and one of our cinema major friends) thought TRL was superior in all ways. I told them that TRL was a very poetic and philosophical view of war, which is fine and has its place, but I really took in SPR’s guttural realism. I thought it was far more appropriate for war films that always seemed to be dramatized, and got many people to really see what war is like.
My favorite part in TRL is Woody Harrelson blowing his ass off with a grenade.