Allied bid placement strategies

a $6 bid can be a sub in sz35.  This can put the bind on Japan if you wanted to try to mess with Japan.  41 requires a slowing of Japan for the allies to win unless you go all KGF.

I will note that a 3 unit bid is not necessarily equate to a dead med axis fleet.  Germany can buy an IC in bulgaria and purchase a carrier to keep the fleet alive.  Is that a good move for the axis?  probably not, but maybe?  Depends on how agressive Germany wants to get after Russia, with Italys help, thru the black sea.

In a way it’s a good thing AA50 isn’t balanced because w/o the bid it would be less interesting to play…  The bid adds spice and diversity, and as the bid ticks higher it has the potential to open up some new Allied strategies.

Some good ones include
–ss to 35.  Personal favorite, because this gives Japan palpable problems for just 6 ipc, and sometimes the sub bid leads opponents to make riskier plays on J1/J2 then they would have or should have.  Great bid against novices and experts alike.
–inf (or 2) to Egy.  While the attack on Egy is iffy even with no bid, for safety sake it’s prudent to place an inf to prevent a Round 1 dicing.  If Axis still goes for Egy with the bid unit then on average they should pay a stiff price, though occasionally it will still work.  With regard to 3-4 unit placements on Egy…that bid would be pretty useful if it’s enough for UK to threaten an attack on Libya UK1.  I have no experience with it since TripleA only allows 1 unit per territory placements.
–All to Ekr/Bel.  Think about it–the Eastern front is where the money is and where the game is usually decided.  15 ipcs in NOs for Germany, 10 ipcs in NOs for Russia.  If you can place 2-3 more offensive units in Eastern Europe it could enable R1 counterattacks that could turn the tide of that front and mean big time $ for Allies.
—All offensive land units to Bry.  Pretty risky play usually but if you’ve got a really big bid you might have enough to take down Man…this gives Japan huge headaches.
–Fig to Bry.  This gives you a free trn kill + an extra fig for Russia the rest of the game.

Plus there’s plenty of Pacific bid placements that could open the door for KJF.

@Zhukov44:

In a way it’s a good thing AA50 isn’t balanced because w/o the bid it would be less interesting to play…  The bid adds spice and diversity, and as the bid ticks higher it has the potential to open up some new Allied strategies.

Some good ones include
–ss to 35.  Personal favorite, because this gives Japan palpable problems for just 6 ipc, and sometimes the sub bid leads opponents to make riskier plays on J1/J2 then they would have or should have.  Great bid against novices and experts alike.
–inf (or 2) to Egy.  While the attack on Egy is iffy even with no bid, for safety sake it’s prudent to place an inf to prevent a Round 1 dicing.  If Axis still goes for Egy with the bid unit then on average they should pay a stiff price, though occasionally it will still work.  With regard to 3-4 unit placements on Egy…that bid would be pretty useful if it’s enough for UK to threaten an attack on Libya UK1.  I have no experience with it since TripleA only allows 1 unit per territory placements.
–All to Ekr/Bel.  Think about it–the Eastern front is where the money is and where the game is usually decided.  15 ipcs in NOs for Germany, 10 ipcs in NOs for Russia.  If you can place 2-3 more offensive units in Eastern Europe it could enable R1 counterattacks that could turn the tide of that front and mean big time $ for Allies.
—All offensive land units to Bry.  Pretty risky play usually but if you’ve got a really big bid you might have enough to take down Man…this gives Japan huge headaches.
–Fig to Bry.  This gives you a free trn kill + an extra fig for Russia the rest of the game.

Plus there’s plenty of Pacific bid placements that could open the door for KJF.

great ideas zhuk :)

i ve would add only one

a sub or two in sz 12

zhukov pretty much summed it up.

I am a fan with 11-13 ipc bid that 1inf to egypt. one inf/art/or tank in east ukraine, and one tank in belo.

13 bid 10 could go to russia 1 inf kare 1 art east ukraine 1 inf cauc to stop a kare opening which i haven’t seen work with a wide range of sucess.

i have seen a 13 bid go all to russia two arts one in eu and one in belo, and a tank in russia…that allows for a pretty good round 1 counter at the cost of egypt.

as for saving sz 2 germans have two options if you place a dd in sz 2 hit it with 2 subs a fighter and a bomber and then do sz 12 with only 2 fighters(needing only to kill the dd in 12 to save the italian fleet)this one you mentioned or they can ignore sz 2 and kill sz 9 and 12 with sub/bomber to 9, and sub/ 2fighters to12… but i am a fan of hitting sz2 if the dd bid is there but thats just preference

i have yet to see a great pacific bid work. thoughts on that are reinforce india(for a factory), that would mean something like tank in egypt, inf in india, and a inf/or better what is leftover with the bid… then move tj, to persia and tanks to persia and a the egypt fighter to india and reinforce india with russain units, a inf or two to persia round 1 or/with a tank support round two in india…usually however a good german can beat this
i dont advise doing it just some thoughts to fuel the topic

some bids that are illegal on triple A but idk if they are illegal here, 12 dollars to russia, bomber in bury and hit the jap dd and two tranies off the carolines. or you could buy two  russian subs and place sz 56 and wipe out the jap carriers and fighters off midway…these bids are illegal in triple A but idk the exact bid rules on .org

Also another bid that is ilegal in triple A… I do not know about on here, If you want to save sz 2, place a destroyer in sz 8, block the subs.

A LEGAL bid maybe place a dd in 12 that way germany needs two hits not just one to save the italian fleet round 1 and if germnay is feeling unlucky they throw an extra unit at sz 12, and YOU MIGHT be saving sz 2 because the german needs to hit 12 with more units…the standard 1 sub two fighters against this bid gives the germans a 52% chance of winning…that being said they don’t have to win they just have to leave only a cruiser in that sz…or take out the fighter in egypt

Also just thinking out loud I HAVE NEVER TRIED THIS OR SEEN IT DONE….

if you go the dd route you may not even need a bid in egypt… if you place the DD off the coast of india(sz 35)…the japs can only send two fighters at 35 round one thats vs two dd’s and a transport(i know they don’t defend but if it lives it gives you counter strikes) thats a 61-64% chance of winning for the japs… but if you lose as the japs that means a DD may have lived and forsure a trannie, thus allowing indian units to board and hit egypt or take back borneo/east indies and if a DD lived kill a jap trannie…again thats not how I use my bid but just some options and things to consider also i would most likely only use this bid in dice because in a LL game egypt is a given with at the VERY least a bomber if no bid is placed in it

Why would 2 submarines in SZ 63 be illegal?  Just because it can be devastating?

Not sure if I’d ever get a bid higher than 7 - to be honest, just because 8 gets into the destroyer range.  Personally, I am leaning towards Egypt due to the money in Africa, but I could see units going into Russian territories as well…make them pay for taking stuff.  Few infantry in Belarus or a couple artillery could be productive in counter attacking the Germans.

Triple A bid rulesVVVVVVVVVV

"No bomber purchases are allowed for this game and bid combination

These IPCs may be spent on units to be placed on the board prior to game start. The IPC may be split by the allies in any way. The first restriction is that no more than one unit may be placed per territory. Naval units must go into a sea zone with existing Naval units of the same nation. Placement of naval units in empty sea zones or placement of, for example, British units with American units (and vice versa) is not allowed. Similiarly, ground/air units must be placed in the territories controlled by the same nation. However, ground units may be placed in territories that have no existing ground/air units.

Unspent IPC’s from the bid can be divided up between the Allies for spending in future turns as the Allied player desires."

That’s why it is illegal.

what I found from .org tournament rulesVVVV
"You will be bidding for the Allies.
Full placement bids.  Standard bid rules apply (can only place bid in spots where you already have units, etc.)
You will bid in IPC, but you can spend the bid on units once bidding is completed.
Bidding will be done in an Auction Style to keep everything in house.
Once brackets are assigned I (or another mod) will do a random roll for each round to see which player will start the bidding (either top player on bracket or bottom).  The players will then bid down until one player concedes the sides.

Example
Player 1 - I’ll play the Allies with 9
Player 2 - I’ll play the Allies with 7
Player 1 - I’ll play the Allies with 6
Player 2 - You win, you can take the Allies with 6"

since no units of your power start in the pacific as russia it is illegal in triple A, and by the looks of it same with on here…

if you only get 7 dollars, you are forsure playing dice… If you think 7 is enough when the dard is open (sz 16) then thats your prefernce, i won’t argue, i have seen plenty of games where the bid is higher than 7, but as of the guidelines to this post a destroyer bid is possible…agian not saying I would do it or that it is the right thing to do just pointing out the options, saving sz 2? saving 12? saving 35? who knows, but I feel that was the point of this post was to discuss possibilites and not every game counts so if you want to get ridiculous place a crazy bid, you still will have a fun game.

I guess.  It’s been a while since I played hot and heavy with Anniversary, but I am loathe to give my opponent more than 2 units!

if i get it good it is illegal to place units in the territory and sz where your nation already do not have any units right?

For A&A.org:
Units must be joining unit(s) of the same power, and must be put on a territory controlled by the power (relevant for 1942 scenario).

So Germany can’t place units on Libya in 1942 and USA can’t put units on Great Britain.
DD blocking in Z8 and Russian subs in Pacific are not allowed (as Darth said) because there are no UK units in Z8 and no Russian units anywhere in the Pacific at game start.

Russian bomber on Bry to sink destroyer at 51 plus 2 transports is very risky. I would never do it against good competition. There is only a 57% chance the bomber sinks everything and survives. There is a 29% chance you trade the bomber for the destroyer. There is a 14.3% chance you lose and don’t sink the destroyer. Any part of the 43% is a horrible failure for your 12 bid, and you have no help in Egypt or Russia or the Atlantic.

Bids are over-rated, more often than not. Unlike Jenn, I have no problem allowing more than 2 units. I gave a bid of 19 to a very worthy opponent, and he took fighter to Bry (free sink of transport and fighter for rest of game like Zhuk said) and 3 infantry to Egypt (he could have added SIX units!). It’s now round 15, and I think it’s been a lock for my Axis for a couple of rounds now.
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=24311.600

As Darth said, bids greater than 12 can be appropriate, depending on the players. In my experience, what happens with the dice on round 1 far outweighs any puny little bid of 12 or less. Bids are a great way to agree on sides, and not much more.

To address the original question, I think all the obvious places are good.
Russian front but not in BSt, Ukr, or EPl.
Fighter to Bry
At LEAST one infantry to Egypt (I agree with Zhuk - go with 2 units or more to prevent disaster) As Axis, I will attack Egypt on G1 even with one extra infantry there. Hit and run and let the Italians clean up on I1. In round 2 of the tournament I did precisely that, and the Germans took it over with a tank and bomber remaining. Opening round dice always matter a lot more than a bid. I’ve seen so many bids completely negated by round 1 dice or be rendered useless.
Sub to 35 may or may not be very effective. Sometimes it is, sometimes not so much.
Have thought about destroyer to 12, but never done it or had it done against me. Would increase your chances of saving Z2, but if you don’t add anything to Egypt at the same time, you’re just asking the German player to paste Egypt and hit zone 12 hard, leaving Z2. Yes, you get to start with 2 transports and a battleship, but pretty much losing your bid and Egypt would not be pretty. Maybe if you got a 13 bid and put a destroyer in 12 and a tank in Egypt?

I put an infantry and tank in Egypt in my Semi-Finals tournament game against the great Yoshi, and he went after North Africa hard - transporting Germans there for a couple turns and keeping some German air south, chasing my enlarged Egypt force south for the rest of the game. So even 8 IPC’s added to Egypt don’t ensure you trap the Italian fleet in the Med. At this point I’m thinking I should have let him have the Allies at 9 or 11 or whatever. But then again, he was blessed with no disasters on the first round, and I had a huge disaster on R2 so that pretty much set the direction for the game. It’s in about round 8 - you can see it here: http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=25806.240 So against a lesser opponent 8 may be ample for Egypt, but this game seems to indicate that 3-4 units in Egypt are not overkill.

good post gamer :)

i think the game will evolve in the future and that the bid will rise

i agree with U DM. i would even say maybe nothing to egy and all to eastern front

Enjoyed the post, DM
Good points