@Imperious:
Star Trek: The Motion Picture was not a sequel and it was probably the most developed plot wise. It was not action and special effects just to show off. It was a movie of substance.
While I kind of agree that people write this film off before they should, I don’t believe that it was the best, or my favorite, of the Trek movies. I agree that it is not as abysmal as many believe… and perhaps is the most “Star Trek”-like of all the Star Trek movies. However, as movies go, the story line does not continually spark interest and some of the exposition might be overlong. Definitely not the worst on the list though. I can really appreciate the fact that it does have intellectual substance, where newer movies, Trek included, are shallow, mostly unoriginal CGI fantasy-fests.
Phantom Menace fell far short of its potential, but I don’t hate or even dislike the movie. Jar-Jar considered. A blight to be sure, but he didn’t utterly ruin Ep. I-III for me. There is some very good casting in this movie (Neeson, McGregor, Portman?), but yes some bad. The plot is not bad, but could have been better without some elements. The lightsaber fight at the end is probably my favorite in all of Star Wars. Overall, the movie was not horrible, but it was not nearly great either.