The whole story is a bit convoluted and just messed up in a number of ways; which makes it hard to articulate a stance one way or another.
I don’t know that I will ever feel the need to kill a lion. They are beautiful creatures, much cooler alive than dead in my opinion. However, if it is legal hunt them in a certain manner, I have no problems with someone else doing it.
The problem for this guy was that apparently Cecil (by virtue of his tracking collar) was not able to be hunted. From what I have read, it appears neither the doctor or his guide knew this particular lion was Cecil (or that he had a collar) until after he was dead. That doesn’t absolve them of a crime, it just would indicate that they didn’t go out to kill Zimbabwe’s most famous lion (who I had never even heard of before this story) on purpose.
The fact that the lion had a name just makes it easy for people to care about it. How many of the general public really knew this lion before the story (not that we can know)? How many of those people are outraged every time a lion is killed?
The thing that disgusts me more than the killing of the lion, which I do think is sad and unfortunate, is the public outcry that seems to be condemning and convicting this man all at once. He should be prosecuted fully if he has broken the law, but social media just turns events like these into a witch hunt.