@ckladman Yes, the game tends to favor the allies without objectives, and the axis with. To balance, you could trying giving a bid (additional starting units) to the side that is at a disadvantage, or play with objectives but reduce the payout. (3 ipcs vs 5.)
Analytical Help
-
Yes, thanks for looking at game 1. I’ve reviewed it a few times myself. It was my first AA50 game and hence I had a lot to learn!
Mind taking a look at one of the later games and discussing it with me?
-
Hi,
I checked game 7 - i was impressed - much better than game 1.
to find out what went wrong is quite easy:
If Germany loses Norway + Finland there has to be done everything to deny the Russians access to the 10 IPC Bonus, which means Bulgaria + Poland should be fortified heavily. And what happend ? Russia got 47 IPC round 3 + 45 IPC round 4 - game over.
I tried to find out, why Germany was so weak on the Eastern front: Then I saw it - you wanted to keep UK + US out of France and pilled up units there. Exactly that units you did have on the Eastern front.
Well it’s always hard to play Germany/Italy if alle 3 Allies go for you, but i would prefer hand out UK + US the 5 IPC bonus for France instead of the 10 IPC for Russia.
Don’t forget UK can only buy 8 units at London, once they have a fleet + 4 Transports, they need only 32 IPC/round (4 Inf + 4 armour), so don’t care about Uk, give them the 5 IPC for France and kick them out of Europe in your next turn. Even a UK with 70 IPC is not as dangerous as a Russia with 45 IPC, cause UK can’t use that money, while Russia can. Russia is the one the Axis have to kill.
But in overall it was a good game, if you have that units not in France but in EPL, you will get another 5 IPC bonus and Russia will not have that money. So far the strategy check. in overall: Holding France is interesting, but does not work if all Allies play a KGF strategy. Better expand quickly on the Eastern Front, kick out Allies from France and later carefully pull back to protect Germany + Italy, but then Japan is near Russia capital. With a better buying as Italy (4 inf instead of a bomber) it would have been harder for the Allies to capture Rome.
Some details:
-
attacking Egypt as Germany without the bomber - unwise, losses are too high, just for strafing purpose
-
Buying a bomber for Italy = crap
-
Buying 1 Transport + 2 armour for Japan in Round - i don’t link it, I prefer an immediate IC in manchuria, which is always strong, but even stronger when US doesn’t bother you (as happened here)
-
The IC on an 4 IPC Island is interesting, but you always require transports and that transports require cover. I don’t like that, better build that IC in India. However, that’s not the reason for the Axis defeat, it was the income of Russia which makes it too hard for Japan to pressure such a rich Russia quickly.
-
if you have so many transports as Japan, conquer Hawaii + Wake island ( means - 5 IPC for US, as it’s a bonus)
-
do not repair Rome if you have already 9 IPC damage. wait one round, send German tanks + fighter for shelter. It’s highly unattractive for the Allies to bomb a damaged Italian factory when the odds of making a maximum of 3 IPC damage is worse than the loss of a bomber to an AA hit. Next round repair and buy 6 units for Italy. Remember 12 is the maximum damage for Rome, from then on they can’t harm you any more. If you repair every round they bomb you again every round. better repair every second round !
-
I don’t like your German first round attacks on the eastern front
You have two possibilities: either conquer that strong that any counterattack is crazy or that weak, that you do not lose much. Especially that tank you lose in Ukraine counterattack is a bitter loss.
Some Ideas to improve: Ukraine - is the most critical battle - why ? Well in G1 NCM you can move some units from Germany to Poland.
This means if Russia attacks either EPL or BST that support units from Poland will immediately be useful for another attack in G2.
Unfortunately for you Ukraine is harder to re-attack in G2 as you can’t bring units to Bulgaria in G1.So either: “the weak attack”
3 Inf + 1 Art + 1 fighter vs 2 Inf in Ukraine
Goal, kill 2 units and get 2 IPC income
or: “the hard attack” 3 Inf + 1 art + 3 tanks in Ukraine
Goal: make a counterattack impossible
––
If you do the hard attack, do the other battles that way:
3 tanks + 3 Inf to EPL
Inf + art + 1 fighter + 2 units transported (1 Inf from NWE + 1 Inf from Germany) + Cruiser Bombardment for BST
NCM: 2 Inf + art to Poland
Yes Russia can attack in BST, but a) it’s only a 1 IPC territory, while Ukraine is worth 2 IPC, b) BST is reachable for all German air units, while Ukraine is too far (at least to land somewhere to threaten UKs fleet for G3) and c) your Poland units can attack BST in G2.
Try it !
GL & HF -
-
Crossover has some good info to look at. I agree wholeheartedly on skipping on buying an Italian bomber and I like his G1 attacks. Bst is a very hard territory to secure first round, so I have lately been taking it lightly and focusing my troops in the south.
Russia having 45 IPC’s is going to result in Germany losing a lot of ground. If you don’t have troops on the front trading everyturn and attempting to hold the line in Russian territory, you will soon have a mountain of infantry with a few offensive pieces able to advance and fending off counterattacks.
I think a +1 to Crossover is in order for his incredibly useful post :-)
-
Ok i’m looking at game 8 and see a few mistakes.
R1
Do NOT abandon Karelia! G had 4 inf, 1 art, 3 arm and a bunch of planes in range. Russia could have had a stack of 11 inf, 1 art, 1 arm plus 2 uk figs there. You gave germany free money without them even having to work for it. If you had to do an attack you should have struck Baltic States.So I loose the fleet you suggest to not spend as much $ on? If those fighters are in KAR they sure as heck aren’t keeping a fleet above the waters, right?
If Germany wants it they can take KAR on G2and If I stack all my defense there I just end up with nothing to trade territories with.
As I said G only had a handful of units in striking range of Karelia. If you give G that much free money you will loose the game. You could have stacked 11 inf, 1 arm, 1 art, plus an optional 2 UK figs, more than enough to hold it. On R1 you must stack the crap outta Karelia or else Germany just makes too much money.
As far as navy best UK1 buy in my book is 1 AC, 3 trans, 1 Destroyer, land the 2 US figs on the carrier. If G has a large quantity of air in range, scratch 2 of the transports for another AC or destroyer. I really like the 3 transports though. In the game I was looking at G only had 2 fighters and 1 bomber in range of SZ 2, the ideal location to drop your fleet. Because of such a large transport buy, you force the germans to defend france heavily. On UK2 you can begin a large shuck of units into Karelia, or, if you need more boats stop in SZ 6, trade NWE and do a large drop on Norway and build more boats.
-
On R1 you must stack the crap outta Karelia or else Germany just makes too much money.
I am not so sure about this. Taking Karelia is worth 7 IPCs (2 plus the bonus). If Russia stacks Karelia, this means they don’t attack Finland and Norway, which are worth 5 IPCs together (5 IPCS I would prefer Russia to have than UK). That is a net gain for Germany of only 2 IPCS.
Additionally, if you are stacking Karelia with the help of the two British fighters, you are costing Russia 5 IPCS for having foreign units on Russian soil.
-
I agree with Rockinroboff on this.
It is a bitter loss that Germany gets Karelia. But I really think that stacking it commits to many Russian forces. They are pinned and if Germany goes a southern route then they are out of range to intervene.
For that same reason - I don’t tend to like putting Russia troops into Norway/Finland.
And also - Rockinroboff is quite right - if you’re bothered about 5 IPCs then putting UK fighters into Karelia loses you 5 anyway.
I say let Germany take Karelia turn 1. It will force her to spread her force. Consolidate around Belorussia and cause trouble in the south - once Germany is moving south - get Karelia back. SBR it and remove AA to invalidate it as a production point. That way the Germans (if they want to use the factory will have to pay (hopefully) 3-4 IPCs just to use it and 6 IPCs just to AA it. They probably won’t - so you can concentrate on fighting in Ukraine. Pushing for Bulgaria and your 10 IPCs as the UK/US take scandinavia.
-
In a KGF it is all about keeping G’s income low. The UK/US should take finland/norway turn 2 regardless, and that extra 7 IPCs for Germany is huge. No matter what G will be making 10 units a turn, an extra 7 IPCs turns two inf they would have built, into 2 armors, or 1 inf into a fighter, or almost another bomber to keep US/UK fleets at bay. Germany will not crumble to the UK/US before Russia crumbles to Japan if you let Germany make 50ish IPCs and Italy 20ish. You must keep there incomes in check. And on turn 2 the UK should begin there shuck into Karelia so that the Russians don’t have to send any more units up there. Now granted if G puts a ton of units in range of Karelia, then you are forced to abandon it typically, but when they only have like 6 ground units in range it is foolish to just give it to them. Also, by abandoning Karelia you allow Germany to put a large stack there to continue trading Finland with the allies, making R’s 10 IPC NO harder to get, and it makes it more difficult for the UK shuck to take off.
-
I play it either way by the way. I’ve stacked KAR and I’ve left it open. I choose to leave it open if the odds are good for Germany to take it even if I stack it. Loosing all those units is just horrid and can really cause a lot more trouble than Germany taking it for a turn.
Perhaps I’m still playing to cautiously against Germany as Russia?
-
I almost always stack Kar and here is why.
- 2 UK figs that I land there are UK units killing Germans as early as G2.
- AA guns can really wreak G’s air and cause CDF during an attack on Kar by G.
- It is where I start my UK shuck on UK2, even if G takes it in force, UK will usually wipe out any survivors
- It kills German units.
If you let G reach critical mass in IPCs OR unit count you are doomed. But if you kill German units your friends (US/UK) have a much easier time cracking that nut open. I have had many games where on R1 I stack Kar, on G2 it is taken leaving a few German tanks left, Russia begins to push back in the south and begins stacking up Persia/Chingai and the UK lands in Kar killing the remaining armor. This means G will usually only have token inf/art on Russias doorstep with 9 inf/1art in Poland and whatever they built in Berlin. A very good looking board for the allies.
Let me give you an example, if Germany were to bring 10 inf, 1 art, and 6 arm up against 11 inf, 1 art, 1 arm, 2 figs, they would have roughly 5 units left on average. That is the most ground G can have in range for G2. For each plane that comes along you can assume 1 more ground unit left, but that gets messy because of AA gun. If the UK builds boats in SZ 2 (the best) the US can land up to 2 fighters on UK’s carrier. The UK should have 2-4 transports loaded up ready to drop into Kar on UK2 killing all german survivors. This is a worst case assumption, G should not have that many units in range.
Russia absolutely needs to be offensive but must be careful because of Italian can opener threat. This leaves you few options. You can either build planes and set up trades and deadzones, you can mass up units to push G’s back in Belo or Ukraine, or you get germans to die by attacking you. I perfer the last 2 options and that is why my favorite R1 purchase is 2 inf, 6 arts. I stack Kar. If G ignores Kar I move all those units into Belo and purchase tanks R2, being sure to move as many inf as needed into Ukraine to block the can opener and move my AA guns in Kar and Cauc to cover Belo and Ukraine (let them SBR me there I don’t care). This gives you a force of around 18 inf, 8 art, and 6-7 armor that can hit East Poland on R3. Along with G loosing Finland/Norway to the US/UK, an US fleet in SZ 12, and the SBR campain begining in force, this makes for a bad German turn 3. Sure they can attack you, or continue stacking, but then soon you and the UK will rally in Baltic or East Poland and begin driving the fascist back. Its almost like revised except the US goes after Italy/Africa instead and stays down there till they can take Italy or France.
-
There is another way for the Allies.
a 4 TP 2 way shuck between ECa and Fra hitting France on Turn 3, and every turn thereafter with 8 units, not including air units, is a very shocking blow to the Axis.
-
Problem with that is by the end of I2 there should be around 5 Italy inf on france, going up by 3-6 a turn every turn, not even counting the german inf or the large number of fighters that germany and Japan can put there, and lastly that does nothing directly to take pressure off of Russia. And with bombers in france you need 2 navies to cover them. But to each there own.
-
Analytical help is nice, but there is only one way to be a decent player,and that is to practice and practice again, and play a lot of games, especially against players who are more experienced. Yesterday I played my first AA50 game since several months ago, and most logically, I did a lot of mistakes :-( :-)
-
I understand that with play my skills and strategies will improve. I’ve just felt like getting some of the community to talk out some of my gameplay would help me get a grip on what I need to focus on.
-
I understand that with play my skills and strategies will improve. I’ve just felt like getting some of the community to talk out some of my gameplay would help me get a grip on what I need to focus on.
Nothing wrong with strat talks!
Personally, I think TripleA is a very efficient way of learning a lot, regardless if one prefers TripleA online vs “anyone”, or if someone prefers F2F in a local playgroup. This is most valid for games that are older than AA50 though. Not many veteran AA50 players yet, compared to revised. If you use the PBF you can achieve the same goal, but TripleA is way more time-efficient.
A couple of years ago I was on par with a couple of revised players, but after I started playing TripleA online I beat the crap out of them! Unfortunately they learned from me, it took only a few games before we were at the same level again, but we all got better then before I started playing against a “worldwide pool” of A&A players.
-
One of these days Sub i’ll take you down again :evil:
Just wish TripleA would finish the change, and my weekend connection would improve.
-
One of these days Sub i’ll take you down again :evil:
Not with a $5 bid for allies if I’m axis :mrgreen:
Remember, you estimated allies bid being lower b/c they are more difficult to learn and to master, and you were right, but with LL you can only bid so low…… :-)
And for regular dice, which I strongly disfavor, AA50 is actually pretty balanced, the only problem is that many games are decided during the first rnd.
-
This may not be the place to discuss it, but what is up with AA:50 on TripleA? I haven’t been able to access the Unstable server for several months, though I don’t often get an opportunity to try. The community boards seem pretty dead as well. Is the dice server for PBEM still functional?
-
This may not be the place to discuss it, but what is up with AA:50 on TripleA? I haven’t been able to access the Unstable server for several months, though I don’t often get an opportunity to try. The community boards seem pretty dead as well. Is the dice server for PBEM still functional?
I have heard the unstable lobby is occasionally functional - but never when I have tried. I have had a lot of success advertising for AA50 games in the stable lobby, and just arranging to play over direct connection using the 1034 release.
-
I have heard the unstable lobby is occasionally functional - but never when I have tried. I have had a lot of success advertising for AA50 games in the stable lobby, and just arranging to play over direct connection using the 1034 release.
Huh. Good idea, I’ll try that sometime.
-
Do NOT abandon Karelia! G had 4 inf, 1 art, 3 arm and a bunch of planes in range. Russia could have had a stack of 11 inf, 1 art, 1 arm plus 2 uk figs there. You gave germany free money without them even having to work for it. If you had to do an attack you should have struck Baltic States.
While in this game I would agree with you that he should not have given up Karelia, if Germany is really gunning for it I abandon it every time. While that’s a big stack Russia can put there, Germany will take it if it wants to and it’s inevitable. If they don’t take it G2 then they’ll take it G3 and then you’re going to have a gigantic German presence there with no Russian troops behind it in Arc. I’d rather pull the AA gun, 5 inf, and 1 art out of there to be used later instead.
Although granted once again, he should have held on to Karelia in this particular situation.
Suggested Topics
