If you are playing Revised with a bid then one possibility is to add a 2nd G transport to the Med fleet instead of adding units to Libya/Algeria. It doubles the transport capacity and can make the Russian player weary on an amphibious attack on the Caucasus/Ukraine.
Like mentioned above the drawback is that additional units sent to Africa won’t be used on the Eastern front and the 2nd transport will be sunk with the rest of the fleet if the Allies decide to do so.
Nit picky German Economizer
-
100% means you can put 100% on the board or 0% or anything in between. basically, not a FIDA bid, they’re dumb IMHO.
And I have yet to get tripleA to function.
-
I think it is more situtaioall then. Is worth risking 3 ipcs or 0 ipc loss to draw forces off another russian attack. so you would have to see if archangel could stop russia from attacking something else or give u better odds in another battle. SO it all depends on the results of R1.
That means everyone who agreed with me is right - it’s not a good normal move to make. It’s a situational one that depends on bad luck of the Russians, it has no merit otherwise.
-
The biggest reason you can’t count Karelia in the blitz is because Germany has to leave an infantry in Karelia, anyway. Otherwise, you risk a Russian armor blitz to Norway/infantry block in Karelia, 1 fighter+some inf each going to Belo/Ukr, and 1 infantry+all other Russian armor to Arch. In that case, if the UK kills the Baltic TP, Russia will collect on Norway for the rest of the game. Might as well just take Karelia with an inf and be done with it.
And Bean, I’ll get around to responding in our discussion. Keep forgetting about it. Got my mind on the tourney.
-
Oh ok thanks U-505, was wondering if you got my message or not, I appreciate the heads up! Tournament comes first after all :mrgreen:
The biggest reason you can’t count Karelia in the blitz is because Germany has to leave an infantry in Karelia, anyway. Otherwise, you risk a Russian armor blitz to Norway/infantry block in Karelia, 1 fighter+some inf each going to Belo/Ukr, and 1 infantry+all other Russian armor to Arch. In that case, if the UK kills the Baltic TP, Russia will collect on Norway for the rest of the game. Might as well just take Karelia with an inf and be done with it.[/quot
Hmm, are you saying you should take Karelia with an inf regardless? Russia blitzing to Norway is iffy if you leave the 3 inf there and if they only have 1 arm in W. Russia due to a Ukraine/W. Russia attack. In that one case I would still blitz Karelia and out and leave nothing there.
-
The biggest reason you can’t count Karelia in the blitz is because Germany has to leave an infantry in Karelia, anyway. Otherwise, you risk a Russian armor blitz to Norway/infantry block in Karelia, 1 fighter+some inf each going to Belo/Ukr, and 1 infantry+all other Russian armor to Arch. In that case, if the UK kills the Baltic TP, Russia will collect on Norway for the rest of the game. Might as well just take Karelia with an inf and be done with it.
And Bean, I’ll get around to responding in our discussion. Keep forgetting about it. Got my mind on the tourney.
Probably, not necessarily.
What if you left 5 Infantry and a fighter in Norway? (3 Starting + 2 from Transport) etc.
Even without the fighter, I doubt Russia’s blitzing Norway.
-
I’ve never seen Germany do that, but I recently asked (somewhere else) if anyone ever put a bid in Norway. If you had that bid there + two units by TRN, you might keep it out of allied hands for quite a while…
-
Germany starts off pretty lean with infantry so between reinforcing Western from the Allies and the 5 inf in Norway you probably won’t have enough units to keep Russia from advancing heavily into Ukraine or at the very least Belorussia. You’ll most likely be able to make them retreat the following turn but you’ll be losing that income for a turn and Russia will only have to trade 2 territories on their turn so they won’t have to use offensive ground units to trade a third territory on R2.
-
Germany starts off pretty lean with infantry so between reinforcing Western from the Allies and the 5 inf in Norway you probably won’t have enough units to keep Russia from advancing heavily into Ukraine or at the very least Belorussia. You’ll most likely be able to make them retreat the following turn but you’ll be losing that income for a turn and Russia will only have to trade 2 territories on their turn so they won’t have to use offensive ground units to trade a third territory on R2.
But it IS possible to have 5 infantry in Norway on G2. :P
I never said it was recommended or even a moderately good move. I just said it was possible, and a way to prevent Russia from blitzing Norway. Actually, it might even be enough to keep England from attacking Norway.
-
Well, that’s the dilemma. If you leave too few units the UK can destroy them and if you leave too many you’re giving Russia an opportunity.
I usually leave it empty just because I don’t want to leave those units exposed and they are more needed elsewhere. Despite being only a couple territories away from Germany, Norway is just too isolated to defend properly.
-
Actually, I think with no ground forces Norway is pretty well defended as it is.
England has to attack the German fleet in SZ 5 if they want to land in Norway on Round 1. If you built a carrier, that’s end of that plan right then. If you are like me and did not, then Germany has a VERY good chance of killing 1, 2 or all 3 British aircraft if they go with the OOL of Sub, Sub, Trn, Destroyer.
If England does NOT attack SZ 5 and tries to land in Norway (can only be done from SZs 3 or 6 on UK 1) then Germany with their fighters in W. Europe can hit SZ 3 hard with fleet for fodder so as to minimize the chance of losing fighters.
What does that mean? England usually does not attack Norway on round 1. :P
-
@Cmdr:
If England does NOT attack SZ 5 and tries to land in Norway (can only be done from SZs 3 or 6 on UK 1) then Germany with their fighters in W. Europe can hit SZ 3 hard with fleet for fodder so as to minimize the chance of losing fighters.
What does that mean? England usually does not attack Norway on round 1. :P
Unless the UK lands in Norway from sz3 and builds a DD in sz6. That leaves them more than enough income to add aircraft, a CV, or subs to help clear out the baltic next turn.
-
Yea, but now you build a DD (12 IPC) + a CV (16 IPC) leaving you 2 IPC left which isn’t even enough to purchase a single infantry unit.
So you landed in Norway and probably lost a destroyer in SZ 6, cause what the heck, I have nothing to lose in killing it now! I can reasonably expect 2 Fighters, Bomber, Battleship, 2 Transports and a Carrier to attack me in SZ 5.
And, you have nothing to land on UK 2 because you spent everything on Navy.
Dunno if it’s a good option or not. Just saying from where I sit, and untested by me personally, I’m not thinking CV + DD build just to land all my available units in Norway and have nothing left to move on UK 2 is a good move.
Better would be an assault on Karelia or Algeria. IMHO
-
If SZ5 is not reinforced on G1 and the baltic is just sitting there, I will just land in Norway on UK1. I have to say though that I usually do the Ukraine attack, so Germany only has 4 fighters in W. Europe. I start with a build of 2 tran 3 inf 1 arm, and place everything in SZ3, which is usually safe enough. The airforce attack on SZ5 has a good chance of succeeding, or at the very least removing 3 of the pieces, and if it doesn’t go so well then block off the attack with the Russian sub so Germany can only bring 4 fighters vs 1 bb 4 tran, which isn’t a great idea.
-
I actually invite the Ukraine attack now. It costs Russia more in the long run then Germany, I think. I used to bid units there to make it too costly to attack and keep my fighter. But I don’t anymore.
Anyway, if you invade Norway on UK 1 with BB, DD, AC, 2 TRN, 2 FIG Germany can, and i think should, attack with 2 SS, DD, TRN, 4 FIG, BMB.
According to Frood you wipe out the British fleet with a bomber, fighter left. Replacing fighters for Germany is much easier then for England and you have, in essence, just eliminated England as a threat to the Germans for multiple rounds.
Why? Because they have to protect transports with something! That means buying a capitol ship, replacing fighters, and replacing transports. Germany has to replace 3 fighters, which they can do at a rate of one a round or faster if they want too. Meanwhile, the west can be protected half has hard since it is only America the Germans really need to worry about. Maybe if England stays with the American navy they can cut costs, but even still, that means they can only invade from the north, leaving the south and Africa open for the Axis to leave lightly garrisoned.
-
Anyway, if you invade Norway on UK 1 with BB, DD, AC, 2 TRN, 2 FIG Germany can, and i think should, attack with 2 SS, DD, TRN, 4 FIG, BMB.
Yes you should, but I really hope that’s not how you actually read my post. If you read my post, I said to attack the Baltic and wipe it out or take out at least 3 naval pieces, so there is no attack in SZ3. I also said to block with a Russian sub if for some reason too many naval pieces survived (although you can’t block subs of course, but they should be the first 2 units to die in the air assault). And I also didn’t recommend building a carrier if there’s only 4 fighters available to hit 1 bb + 4 tran.
I actually invite the Ukraine attack now.
I never appreciate it as Germany. It makes things a lot more uncertain than the simple W. Russia + Belo attack. First, it’s quite common to see between 3 tanks and 3 tanks 1 art in Ukraine, which means you have to burn an unhealthy amount of inf/arm to retake it. Second, the loss of the fighter is pretty annoying, it almost forces you to attack the UK bb with bb/tran/sub/2 figs instead of going to Anglo, because if you try to land heavy in Anglo you’re opening yourself up to the chance of either losing something big to the destroyer there or in Anglo itself since you’re down a fighter that would be helping in one of those battles.
-
I invite the attack on Ukraine because there is nothing I can do to stop it if Russia wants to do it. Furthermore, the attack on Ukraine will cost Russia 3 armor one way or the other. That’s 75% of their starting armor and half what they probably have after Round 1. Sure, it cost me a tank and a plane, but so what? I can recover that!
As for hitting SZ 5, again, as Germany, I welcome it! I purposely don’t buy a carrier on Round 1 in most (not all) games in the hopes England attacks it on UK 1 and I knock down 1 to 3 British Fighters/Bomber! Odd’s are tremendous to get all three, but I have a good chance at one or two! And without those fighters to defend your fleet in SZ 3, I won’t need the German fleet for fodder, well, I will, but not as much.
-
I invite the attack on Ukraine because there is nothing I can do to stop it if Russia wants to do it.
If that’s your main reason, then I say put 2 inf there. Russia now has an alarming chance of either not taking Ukraine or losing a fighter in order to do so.
Furthermore, the attack on Ukraine will cost Russia 3 armor one way or the other. That’s 75% of their starting armor and half what they probably have after Round 1. Sure, it cost me a tank and a plane, but so what? I can recover that!
3 armor = 1 armor + 1 fighter in terms of IPCs. Plus, you’ll be forcing them to lose more inf and very probably arm when they counterattack. Your goal is to wear Germany out by making reasonable trades wherever you can, because remember you have to attack Germany separately later on and if you let the units clump too high by conserving yourself too much early on, then it’ll make life very unpleasant.
As for hitting SZ 5, again, as Germany, I welcome it! I purposely don’t buy a carrier on Round 1 in most (not all) games in the hopes England attacks it on UK 1 and I knock down 1 to 3 British Fighters/Bomber! Odd’s are tremendous to get all three, but I have a good chance at one or two! And without those fighters to defend your fleet in SZ 3, I won’t need the German fleet for fodder, well, I will, but not as much.
Every time I see you say there are tremendous odds to get all three, my head explodes. What do you categorize as tremendous odds? I realize there is a sizeable chance to get all three, but it’s neither a majority chance nor a tremendous chance in my book. Plus, good players will not try to pursue the battle if there’s only 1 plane left, they will retreat. That heavily reduces the chance of losing all 3 air units (both the dest and tran have to hit when there’s 2 planes left, which is 1/12 odds).
It’s not a battle I’m going into grinning, but it’s much better than seeing a carrier there and having to spend tons of cash on boats/planes and toeing around it.
-
I did not say there were tremendous odds to get all three. I said there are very good odds to get one or two with a decent shot at all 3.
And if you put two infantry in Ukraine from a bid, you might scare Russia away. :( I think it’s better to put them in Libya, then Egypt is more assured.
And yes, Russia and Germany lose the same number of IPCs in units in Ukraine from the attack and counter attack. But Germany lost 6 Attack Punch, Russia loses 9 Attack punch. Furthermore, which one starts with 6 fighters and 10 armor and which one starts with 2 fighters and 4 armor?
-
Odd’s are tremendous to get all three,
Read your original post. Did you make a typo? Maybe you meant to say, odds aren’t tremendous to get all three? Because I’m not reading your post wrong at all, maybe you didn’t intend to say that.
And if you put two infantry in Ukraine from a bid, you might scare Russia away. Sad I think it’s better to put them in Libya, then Egypt is more assured.
Egypt is good and fine, but sometimes I like scaring the Russians away. That’s a ton of nice equipment saved in Ukraine, plus if the dice went badly in W. Russia, it’s time to smoke the Russians =)
I dunno, it’s debatable. Egypt is always nice. Always =)
-
The bad thing of losing 1 FIG in Ukraine is that Germany has 1 less fig availbale in G1. This thing may create problems on G1. Sure Germany may buy other fig … after G1 combat move.
Suggested Topics
