@krieghund thanks!
Submarine movement through Danish Straits?
-
Taamvan,
No Russian player has ever asked me if his sub could exit the Baltic…but if asked, I probably would say no…I think I was just venting after the table top game where the guy rolled a 1 and killed my destroyer. Â The game where my fleet was outside the Baltic, I was going for a defensive fleet that had enough meat to project a threat. But that one Russian sub really snubbed the buildup of the fleet. I don’t want extra Russian subs out convoying Germany or going into the Med to convoy Italy.
But sometimes I play with just enough boats in the Baltic + a scramble to protect enough transports to kill a Norway invasion as all other IPCs are invested in ground for defense, mobile for the march into Russia, and air for whatever purpose. After that roll of a 1, I could see the Russian sub doing that to me followed by an Allied Strategic Bombing attack to finish off a small Baltic fleet which could overcome a German scramble.
I may have misunderstood another aspect of your message response, so please don’t take my response wrong.
Did you mean that the Russian Cruiser and sub could theoretically be in SZ113 while Germany and Russia were at peace to prevent Germany from loading transports in SZ113 when wanting to declare war on Russia? Or did you mean just the Russian sub in SZ113?
The Russian sub doesn’t prevent the loading of transports of course (page 13 of the Europe rule book).
-
Just to clarify why I asked. We play a 39 setup where Norway and Denmark are still under Allied control as a Pro-Allies territory. There are some German subs in the Baltic SZ 113 that I would like to use on a naval assault in SZ 111 for the first turn. We haven’t really clarified the rule on this and I thought I would see what the consensus would be from fellow gamers.
I probably should have elaborated a bit but I thought maybe the rule would kind of be the same as Gib. -
I would think that a 1939 start date where Denmark is neutral (pro allies) the Germans or the allies wouldn’t be allowed to move any ships through the Danish straight (no belligerents). I think you would treat it like the Turkish Straights, and while Turkey is neutral neither side can move ships though it. Same for the Panama canal, while the US is neutral I don’t think anyone but the US is allowed to pass.
Actually you could make the case that the Germans would be able to move freely if Denmark was neutral or allied because of the Kiel Canal (another thing that YoungGrasshooper could do in his map re-make)
Edit: I have changed my stance on this because the Danish straights were international waters allowing both sides passage (see later)
-
The movement restriction is, as I understand it, because part of the strait is extremely shallow in reality. I assume the idea is that shore fortifications can easily destroy any ship attempting to pass through without permission.
Marsh
-
If you made it pro allies in your 1939, if the allies control currently control it it, I would allow the Allies through. If they don’t, then neither side can pass (because it is still neutral and you cannot pass, like Turkey).
If on the other hand, you made it a Friendly Territory from game start (like the money islands), I would allow the Allies through but not the Axis, until the Axis take it over, and then the Axis could pass, but not Allies.
-
They don’t stay that way after G1, but the 2 starting subs in 113 would have liked to go attack the UK navy on G1 or G0 as we might call it with a 39 setup. Our timeline runs from Sept 39 to May 40 for the first turn. They are pro allies in the way that Yugo or Greece are. Can’t move off but can be activated by the Allies if Germany was to leave them be. I guess I should probably put this in the House rules area but I wanted to get a consensus if the Gibraltar sub exception would apply here. I am going to rule it doesn’t in case I’m the Allies, although if I’m the Axis player I wish it would.
-
If you let the subs out, you should let them in too. A well placed net is probably a good idea, how many IPCs should a giant metal net cost?
-
I disagree with this. The subs are in reality extremely shallow in part. Control of Denmark is required because of that.
Marsh
-
All bodies of water in a wargame are the same depth; zero. They are two dimensional, not 3. The only thing that is similar about them and real oceans is that they are blue and the color of blue is probably not accurate and up for debate.
-
After some reading I found that the Copenhagen Convention of 1857 named the Danish Straights an International Waterway free to all military and commercial shipping. This is not the case for the Turkish Straights which were directly controlled by Turkey.
In light of that I have changed my stance and believe that while Denmark is neutral (doesn’t matter if pro axis/allies as far as game terms) warships from either side should be able to pass through the straight until the Germans (or allies) take it. Once Denmark is activated then passage of the straight is controlled by that power.
Also found that Churchill had a plan (Operation Catherine) to put a large surface fleet into the Baltic in the spring of 1940 to disrupt trade between Germany, Russia, Sweden (iron ore) etc…but the plan was shelved.
Hitler invaded Denmark and Norway for control of this waterway to keep the allies out of the Baltic, and gain bases along the Norwegian coastline. This would insure trade, and better access to the North Sea (sub warfare and merchant raiding).