@gamerman01 said in 2024 Playoff OOB Round 1 Pacifiers Board (+42) v Gamerman01:
Any scrambling to 111?
none, ty
ONE PROBLEM WITH YOUR MAP 17……I have bel with no inf as you attacked euk with all 10 inf from BEL…
your map should only have 1 arm in BEL…attached correct map
J2 purchase 2IC, trn & ss spend 43 (save 0)
combat
#1 AUS (2inf aa) v BB (z50>z39) ca (z37 >z39) 2inf & arm (phi) 2 inf (bor)
#2 yun (mt) v inf (hup) cwol
#3 nin (mt) v inf (sui) cwol
#4 ind (mt) v inf (bur) cwol
#5 fuk (mt) v inf (kwa) cwol
dice……
AUS attackRolls: 1@4 2@3 4@1; Total Hits: 31@4: (3)2@3: (3, 2)4@1: (6, 6, 2, 6)v 2infRolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (5, 6)
aus cwol
ncm:
z38 trn > z 31
sum 2 inf > z31
z37 cv & 2 fgt > z31
z37 trn . z 61
z50 dd > z 62
kwa inf > fic
KIA 2 FGT > Z62
placement trn & ss z62, IC BUR & SUM
J collects 40 + 15 = 55
@JWW:
ONE PROBLEM WITH YOUR MAP 17……I have bel with no inf as you attacked euk with all 10 inf from BEL…
your map should only have 1 arm in BEL…attached correct map
No, I left 1 infantry behind, otherwise there’s a good chance your Italian tank can kill my tank, allowing you to blitz into Russia. I’m not that stupid :)
Perhaps I am mistaken? You did reinforce with an arm. But the combat moves and attack rolls had 10 inf attacking from BEL to euk.
Can you review?
where ya at CTS 17?
Did I not post? I’m sorry :(
So you are right: I did post 10 infantry to be moved to Euk from Bel, and that is what I rolled. That was not my intention, though. I guess I’m at your mercy to allow me to act as I originally intended. 1 extra infantry sent to Euk was NOT going to make a difference. I just assumed that I had made the changes to my CM when I removed the inf on Abattlemap. That’s why the map was ‘different’ from what I had typed. It’s what I originally intended.
So you are right: I did post 10 infantry to be moved to Euk from Bel, and that is what I rolled. That was not my intention, though. I guess I’m at your mercy to allow me to act as I originally intended. 1 extra infantry sent to Euk was NOT going to make a difference. I just assumed that I had made the changes to my CM when I removed the inf on Abattlemap. That’s why the map was ‘different’ from what I had typed. It’s what I originally intended.
typically I would not allow this. But I will let this slide, THIS TIME. This doesn’t mean I would allow it the next time.
so let’s continue……who’s turn is it?
Thank you so much for your kindness! I suppose otherwise I would have had to sacrifice 2 arm, but ah well :) It’s my turn.
ok, good luck with the brits
Buy
2 TP (14)
3 inf (9)
1 art (4)
1 fig (10)
save (0)
CM:
1 inf 1 arm Eca to Nwe
5 inf 2 art 1 arm 1 fig 1 bom Egy to Lib
Combat;
Lib
att 5 inf 2 art 1 arm 1 fig 1 bom
Rolls: 3@1 4@2 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 53@1: (1, 1, 4)4@2: (5, 1, 5, 4)2@3: (5, 1)1@4: (2)
def 1 inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)
NCM:
1 bom Lib to Gbr
3 inf 1 art 1 AA Per to Trj
2 inf Rho to Cng
1 fig Lib to SZ7
1 fig 2 CV 1 DD 1 TP SZ8 to SZ7
1 fig SZ8 to Gbr
1 DD SZ2 to SZ7
1 DD 1 TP SZ43 to SZ22
Mob Units
3 inf 1 art 1 fig Gbr
2 TP SZ7
Collect Income
30 IPC
sorry, somehow missed that you moved……
ITA 2 purch cv & inf spend 17 (save 0)
combat
#1 egy (mt) v inf (ita) cwol’
#2 ukr (mt) v inf (bul) cwol
ncm:
bul inf & arm > epl
z14 2 ca > z15
ita fgt > z 14
ita art > blk
fra arm > ita
ITA collects 13
Buy
3 TP (21)
3 inf (9)
3 arm (15)
save (3)
CM:
none
NCM:
3 inf Wca to Eca
2 inf 1 art 2 arm Eus to Eca
4 TP SZ10 to SZ1
1 TP 1 DD SZ8 to SZ7
Mob Units
1 inf Chi
3 inf 3 arm Eus
3 TP SZ10
Collect Income
38+10+3=51 IPC
Your map shows your USA bmb’s in GBR but you didn’t list that as a ncm. I will assume the map is correct in all circumstances when the listed ncm’s are not listed.
OK G 3 purchase cv, 3 dd, fgt & arm spend 53 (save 0)
combat
#1 nwe (inf, arm) v CA, 2inf (fin) inf bmb (ger) fgt (fra)
#2 arc (mt) v inf (kar0 cwol
#3 bel (inf, arm) v 2inf(epl) 3fgt (bst, 2z5)
dice……
nwe attackRolls: 1@4 2@3 3@1; Total Hits: 31@4: (3)2@3: (6, 1)3@1: (1, 6, 3)v inf, armRolls: 1@2 1@3; Total Hits: 11@2: (3)1@3: (3)