@dawgoneit 109?
League rules idea: mulligans for patrons
-
gamerman01 2025 2024 '23 '22 '15 '11 '10 Official Q&A Moderatorlast edited by Jan 24, 2024, 9:58 PM
I also veto ELO effects or playoff qualifications or demands on champions! Love the originality, hate the ideas :)
I can be over-ridden by 2/3 of the senate (league)
-
gamerman01 2025 2024 '23 '22 '15 '11 '10 Official Q&A Moderatorlast edited by Jan 24, 2024, 10:00 PM
However!
Apparently we really need support.
If the need is dire enough, I would suggest requiring a bronze badge to play any games in the league. That keeps play fair for all participants.
-
@gamerman01 I donated to the site after I started playing League and had a game or two completed. I think having an allowance of 3 games in League before requiring a badge could be a good compromise.
I agree that having special in-game benefits for patrons feels like the wrong approach, to me. I do love the idea of having special benefits, however; I think this is a good discussion to have. I do not have any suggestions for perks at this time (the bid initiative is a nice idea)
I wonder if there is a way we could drive some engagement with the League by showcasing one of the title matches on YouTube or something. I followed @crockett36 covering the OOB Championship match . With some added production value, like following with a real board setup in the vein of Young Grasshopper or the YouTube wars guys, it might help spotlight the League play here and reach some curious eyes. Maybe some interviews with the players if they were willing to discuss their thought processes/notes. Or an actual show match if some people are interested in participating.
-
gamerman01 2025 2024 '23 '22 '15 '11 '10 Official Q&A Moderatorlast edited by Jan 24, 2024, 10:09 PM
@Stucifer said in League rules idea: mulligans for patrons:
@gamerman01 I donated to the site after I started playing League and had a game or two completed. I think having an allowance of 3 games in League before requiring a badge could be a good compromise.
I was JUST thinking this and then I saw your post
-
gamerman01 2025 2024 '23 '22 '15 '11 '10 Official Q&A Moderatorlast edited by Jan 24, 2024, 10:10 PM
@Stucifer The video would be incredible. I would be so happy if that would become reality.
-
gamerman01 2025 2024 '23 '22 '15 '11 '10 Official Q&A Moderatorlast edited by Jan 24, 2024, 10:11 PM
I have another idea for @djensen
I wonder why the gold is kind of the cap. There are players who would pay more (probably me included). Definitely a way to tap more funds.
Platinum???
Elite/Master/King?
Elite and Master mean a lot around here LOL
-
@gamerman01 there is still the possibility to give a tip beyond the 60 bucks. We should not overdo it - some might not be able to afford 100$ or so, thinking of students etc. I think every status should be reachable by everyone.
-
@gamerman01 Yeah a higher tier is a good idea, I have another passion project I support at $120/year and think having Platinum tier
OR…renaming tiers while adding wouldn’t be a bad idea either ;)
Lieutenant $15
Captain $30
Colonel $60
General $90
Marshal $120 (10/month)
Supreme Commander $180 (15/month) -
@gamerman01 I’ve been thinking about getting a PtV map printed on vinyl by a local print shop, I have a conference room but lighting isn’t great. Might dip my toes into this after tax season
-
gamerman01 2025 2024 '23 '22 '15 '11 '10 Official Q&A Moderatorlast edited by Jan 24, 2024, 10:29 PM
@Stucifer I took it to League Discussion thread
-
@Stucifer said in League rules idea: mulligans for patrons:
on YouTube
I tried to YouTube, it failed. I recorded a “show” where I went over the origin story of the site. It took 5 takes. Then I wanted to add some screenshots of the old site; I never got to it. Then I rewatched the video, I was doing something weird with my mouth and the zoom level was too high. <sigh> 🤦♂️
-
How about this:
- 4 league games for free
- Bronze for 5 or more games
- Silver required for playoffs
I could offer a $120/year level but I’m not sure what perks to add beyond what Gold offers. Maybe you can choose 1-2 people to qualify for more league games and playoffs?
-
@djensen badge might be enough, extra rewards of course are welcome, but to bastardize Napoleon, forum members will fight long and hard, and pay a little extra, for a special bit of colored ribbon 🤓
-
@Stucifer said in League rules idea: mulligans for patrons:
@gamerman01 I donated to the site after I started playing League and had a game or two completed. I think having an allowance of 3 games in League before requiring a badge could be a good compromise.
I agree that having special in-game benefits for patrons feels like the wrong approach, to me. I do love the idea of having special benefits, however; I think this is a good discussion to have. I do not have any suggestions for perks at this time (the bid initiative is a nice idea)
I wonder if there is a way we could drive some engagement with the League by showcasing one of the title matches on YouTube or something. I followed @crockett36 covering the OOB Championship match . With some added production value, like following with a real board setup in the vein of Young Grasshopper or the YouTube wars guys, it might help spotlight the League play here and reach some curious eyes. Maybe some interviews with the players if they were willing to discuss their thought processes/notes. Or an actual show match if some people are interested in participating.
Thanks for the mention. Name it and I’ll make it happen!
-
@djensen said in League rules idea: mulligans for patrons:
@Stucifer said in League rules idea: mulligans for patrons:
on YouTube
I tried to YouTube, it failed. I recorded a “show” where I went over the origin story of the site. It took 5 takes. Then I wanted to add some screenshots of the old site; I never got to it. Then I rewatched the video, I was doing something weird with my mouth and the zoom level was too high. <sigh> 🤦♂️
I could help.
-
I would suggest the gold members!! are part of a senate that oversees the league.
-
djensen Founder 25th ANNIV. TripleA Adminlast edited by djensen Jan 25, 2024, 5:28 PM Jan 25, 2024, 4:46 PM
@djensen said in League rules idea: mulligans for patrons:
How about this:
4 league games for free
Bronze for 5 or more games
Silver required for playoffs
I could offer a $120/year level but I’m not sure what perks to add beyond what Gold offers. Maybe you can choose 1-2 people to qualify for more league games and playoffs?Back to this idea.
The new top tier badge could be “Cross” or “Distinguished” or something. I was trying for Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Gold Star originally but apparently there is no Gold Star? The lower tier could be “War” or “Service” to represent that it’s mostly for playing online.
A Distinguished Patron can award 4 Service Patron badges per year. The recipient of the Service Patron badge may upgrade to any higher badge for a 20% discount.
I still like the idea of an in game benefit. The re-roll idea may not have been specific enough. There are many different flavors:
- Re-roll an entire battle (nope; that’s too much)
- Re-roll all of your units for one round of battle (maybe too much)
- Re-roll all of your units of a specific type for one round (still could be a lot)
- Re-roll one die
- Re-roll one die with a minimum number of units requirement. I.e., you cannot use your re-roll in a 3 on 2 battle; can’t use it for AAA guns; can’t use it for strategic bombing; etc.
Also, if you get 4 wins for your first 4 games, you “win” an service badge. It’s kinda like a qualifier. Don’t hit the qualifier, it’s okay, just pay $15 for the year or find a Distinguished Patron to sponsor you.
-
Updated the above. Last sentence is new.
-
@djensen sorry, but I am absolutely and strictly against any re-rolls, not even one single dice. The result of one match (including all battles) must solely depend on strategic and tactical mastery and dice and never on what a player is willing to pay.
-
@Martin said in League rules idea: mulligans for patrons:
@djensen sorry, but I am absolutely and strictly against any re-rolls, not even one single dice. The result of one match (including all battles) must solely depend on strategic and tactical mastery and dice and never on what a player is willing to pay.
Fair.
What about “wins the coin toss for bids”?