@Stough just remember when playing tripleA that ‘1 more turn’ is never 1 more turn…
Current 2020 Global 1940 2nd Edition Bid?
-
yup :) :)
-
@jim010 said in Current 2020 Global 1940 2nd Edition Bid?:
yup :) :)
all right! That allows for a much smaller allied bid then.
-
I’ll happily play Axis if the Allies want to put 6 inf in Yunnan
-
Perhaps that bid wouldn’t be very flexible - I’d be inclined to throw in 1-2 art and 1-2 USSR fighters, but in any event a bid that precludes the J1 attack on Yunnan is not great for the axis - although may not do enough. Of course, you had 30 bid and put down 10 inf in Yunnan, it would be a waste.
-
I think 10 inf in yunnan would be a game changer. It will be almost impossible for Japan to take India as China (with artillery) will control Burma from yunnan for many rounds.
-
This was the official way of bidding in the league many moons ago. But I suppose I’ll have to get used to the new bidding rules. I definitely understand why teh bids are so high with the unit placement limits.
-
At some point around a 60 bid, Russia can help stack Yunnan on R2 with planes+fast movers and help prevent Japan from capturing any of the British territories in Asia. With Japan hurting so badly for income, I would think that a 100% KGF strategy from USA would be adequate to prevent Germany from winning unless the Allies get diced in risky early-game battles such as a low-odds attack on Egypt. Prolonged income differences are virtually impossible to overcome in a TripleA match; almost anything is possible in live play especially with a mixture of novices and experts.
-
@Arthur-Bomber-Harris
Yep - that Yunnan stack can be a pain.
Suggested Topics
