@ncscswitch:
I have received your Report to Moderator regarding your allegation that Jenforces is a flame.
Usage of the word JENFORCES is a meant to slander me for using fictitious units in game play
The above quote from your Report to moderator is in and of itself false. “Jenforces” did not come about as a result of any fictitious units used in a game, but rather from forum strategy discussions.
To my knowledge, you have not used fictional forces in actual game play. You have however engaged in strategy discussions where you have either used fictional units or have multi-tasked the same unit into multiple combats on the same turn, or deceased units that would certainly have died in an earlier combat… It is one of the reasons I no longer engage you in strategy discussions.
I refuse to allow you to bait me into arguing with a moderator on the public forums. It is a banable offense to argue with a moderator on the boards.
As Mr. NCSCSwitch has confirmed that the term IS USED to insinuate that I am using fictional forces in discussions, I feel justified in labeling it a flame. Therefore, I would appreciate it if you, and everyone else, stop using the term Jenforces as it is a flame. I have never used non-existent forces in either my strategic discussions nor in game play.
Since the only recourse we have as users against flaming or perceived flaming is to refer the offending post to the moderators, I will do so.
a44:
That’s the whole point of going the route to take down W. USA as I have listed. If the US sees the attack, and anyone who looks at the board should see it readily enough, they can easily counter it with one round of ground units. (BTW, it does not even effect their game because those ground units can be used to fill transports later saving you the need to buy them later.)
However, sometimes America does miss it, and then it is a good idea to have the units available. After all, 2 Carriers, 4 Fighters, 2 Battleships, 3 Transports, 5 Infantry, Artillery, Armor is not a lot to have at Solomons/SZ 45 on Japan’s turn. (assuming this is Japan 2 of course, turn one being the sinking of the SZ 52 fleet at Pearl and putting some transports in SZ 60.)
Even if America sees the threat, and it is obvious by all means, you still have a good set up for taking out Australia, Hawaii and New Zealand. After all, that’s 6 Infantry in three different battles you will have to take out, so the firepower will be needed in those attacks and not wasted. (I’d probably go 2 fighters, 2 infantry to New Zealand, Fighter, infantry, armor, battleship to Australia and infantry, armor, fighter, battleship to Hawaii if W. USA got a troop surge.)
