Allied Playbook - G40 Collection of Essays - Compiled by jacobgeo24 Nov 18-19 2023

This is voicealoudreader. iPhone. You can listen to the pdf.

@jacobgeo24 it’s good to have both :)

@crockett36 in the introduction it states you proclaim not to attack UK1 but to regroup which is part of the richochet. Can you elaborate on that?

@Cornwallis several first turn innovations highlight OR. I didn’t come up with them, but they indicate the mindset. I was part of the thread that came up with Gibastion after I contended that Taranto left the British destitute in the Med. I originally combined the Egyptian navy with the French. This Kind of thinking rejects the Tobruk attack as well.

It also can be seen in early game withdrawals from Yunnan unless the Chinese are assisted by foreign fighters and the numbers look at least 40/60.

It can also be demonstrated by withdrawing units but being ready to strike when the fighters go home. Fade and strike tactics.

Battles of attrition are to be avoided early game on account of the political situation. Think turn 5 when planning for turn 1. I would emphasize reserves and an uninterrupted logistical train of units to the front. I would also emphasize no region being without a possible front. OR is mostly a British and Chinese operation, although it is coordinating with Roosevelt behind the scenes and the Russians must not be too bold UNLESS the Germans buy navy first turn. That is for another day.

@jacobgeo24
https://youtu.be/htJEztSxmo8?si=pdWd1Bt5-ndgHJLX

This is something i try sometimes and works pretty good

@jacobgeo24 shiny ships that do nothing all game are my favorite kind of enemy ship.

@jacobgeo24

Very nice. I hope this is pinned.

@Cornwallis said in Allied Playbook - G40 Collection of Essays - Compiled by jacobgeo24 Nov 18-19 2023:

@jacobgeo24
https://youtu.be/htJEztSxmo8?si=pdWd1Bt5-ndgHJLX

This is something i try sometimes and works pretty good

Took a look. I liked it. Not as much as Gibastion. Gibastion has the advantage of being anti-Sealion. However, if I saw a three plane purchase, I would give it a go! I think I would land the planes in Malta. Be a piece or two down and put the fear of God in them if they divided their navy. Does that make sense?

@jacobgeo24

Yes. @Panther thoughts?

Also, as someone who’s looking for new Allied strategies to test, how should I incorporate this into my personal game (I’m playing against myself). I don’t feel like reading almost 50 pages or testing 10 different openers.

In other words, how can I come up with one good Allied strategy for my planned Axis moves (doesn’t matter what they are, but I do know them) for one game only? Thank you!

@jacobgeo24

Phew. Glad I’m not the only one who didn’t. Always feels awkward when you’re the only one who didn’t read everything.

I’ll probably just do the first article’s ideas. They have my head full enough already. 👍👍

@crockett36 said in Allied Playbook - G40 Collection of Essays - Compiled by jacobgeo24 Nov 18-19 2023:

@Cornwallis said in Allied Playbook - G40 Collection of Essays - Compiled by jacobgeo24 Nov 18-19 2023:

@jacobgeo24
https://youtu.be/htJEztSxmo8?si=pdWd1Bt5-ndgHJLX

This is something i try sometimes and works pretty good

Took a look. I liked it. Not as much as Gibastion. Gibastion has the advantage of being anti-Sealion. However, if I saw a three plane purchase, I would give it a go! I think I would land the planes in Malta. Be a piece or two down and put the fear of God in them if they divided their navy. Does that make sense?

It would be too close without the planes in Alexandria.

I think I would skip 106 and send the destroyer to 92.

@jacobgeo24

Agreed (and success, you got pinned).