Yes; you are right.
Chinese fighter and burma
-
@panther said in Chinese fighter and burma:
personally I would never use TripleA for rules confirmation purposes
I don’t
-
@barnee said in Chinese fighter and burma:
@panther said in Chinese fighter and burma:
personally I would never use TripleA for rules confirmation purposes
I don’t
I know. I did not mean to address you in person. It was meant as general statement, that’s why I set an empty line after what addressed you directly.
-
@panther all good. I tested again and triplea works correctly. I had tested on a mod and not the Global 40 game itself. My bad.
@Polishpowerhouse so the answer is yes :)
-
Since the UK is already at war at the start of the game, compared to the US at the start (assume no Axis attacks), while the US cannot move into any other power’s territories (like Canada), the UK and ANZAC, despite not being at war with Japan, can freely move into each other’s territories (like British infantry moving into French Indochina).
-
@superbattleshipyamato said in Chinese fighter and burma:
Since the UK is already at war at the start of the game, compared to the US at the start (assume no Axis attacks), while the US cannot move into any other power’s territories (like Canada), the UK and ANZAC, despite not being at war with Japan, can freely move into each other’s territories (like British infantry moving into French Indochina).
But this is totally unrelated. US restrictions are based on its neutral status/political situation.
And of course allied nations may move into each others (friendly) territories, what is based on simple and standard movement rules, unless other specific rules apply.
This has nothing to do with being at war with Japan or not.Or why are you telling me this?
@superbattleshipyamato said in Chinese fighter and burma:
That being said, considering Britain’s looser neutrality rules,
“Britain’s looser neutrality rules” simply don’t exist.
See my first answer in this thread:
What I am saying there - based on the rulebook - is:China is allied with UK, so UK’s territories are friendly to China. Now China is under movement restrictions (“They [Chinese Units] can be moved only into territories that have a Nationalist Chinese emblem.”). But there is an exception: China may move into Burma and Kwangtung.
This is all independent from questions about “neutrality” and whoever “being at war with Japan”.
-
Sorry for the confusion. The US was just a comparison. I was noting how even on the Pacific side when the UK is not at war with Japan it doesn’t have to act like a neutral power (compared to the Soviets who have separate neutrality rules for both sides of the board).
By “looser neutrality rules” in the second quote I merely meant that while the UK is not at war with Japan, it isn’t a neutral power.
-
@panther thank you. That makes perfect sense.
-
Just to make sure I have it right. China can land it’s Ftr in Burma and JPN can’t attack it unless they are at War with UK.
-
Correct.
-
@barnee said in Chinese fighter and burma:
Just to make sure I have it right. China can land it’s Ftr in Burma and JPN can’t attack it unless they are at War with UK.
Correct. China’s fighter can land in (friendly) Burma due to the “China Rules”, and Japan can’t attack Burma, then, due to the “Powers Not at War with One Another” - rules, as long as Japan is not at war with UK.
-
F farmboy referenced this topic on