The Map Modification Question

wait I am getting confused
the map you sent me has modified (more realistic) continent lines

is this the phase 3 map in the making?
or are you saying phase 3 map with italy won’t have any continent line upgrades?

the map you sent me did have “historical edition” on it written in red though

wait I am getting confused
the map you sent me has modified (more realistic) continent lines

++++ The map you have is for phase 1-2

is this the phase 3 map in the making?
or are you saying phase 3 map with italy won’t have any continent line upgrades?

++++ the phase 3 map is a different undertaking alltogether. I have it a nobody has seen it yet.

the map you sent me did have “historical edition” on it written in red though
++++ yes right it will have the full title redone better.

so are you saying the phase1/2 map will have those continent line updates
but phase 3 might not?

Phase 1-2 map is what you got. except i need to add additonal victory cities

Phase 3 map is with every map change. its the only version that will feature italy, plus changes in IPC values and additional territories.

I am still confused
let me try to ask differently

how come many continent lines have improved in realism (eg. Gilbratar, Japan, Pacific Islands) but you don’t want to change Turkey so that it shows clearer you can now move between Turkey and Balkans?

what was the base map you used?

Thrace will get in the way guys… It will be a violation of Neutrality…

GG

you are now allowed to attack neutral territories
you may also get them to join your side thru diplomatic dices
some neutrals have armies (most apparently Spain, Turkey, Sweden)

check out the latest draft under “phase 8: diplomacy”
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=7188.0

So is this “attacking”? I think this would give them a enemy “diplomatic chit”…

GG

how come many continent lines have improved in realism (eg. Gilbratar, Japan, Pacific Islands) but you don’t want to change Turkey so that it shows clearer you can now move between Turkey and Balkans?

what was the base map you used?

+++ i still used the base map (original) but tracing was done with some minor considerations. The opening is large to show its easy to move into the balkans w/o looking too weird… (like a flood occured)

@Guerrilla:

So is this “attacking”? I think this would give them a enemy “diplomatic chit”…

well the neutral isn’t on your team and you move troops there you attack it
it joins the enemy immediately

what do you mean “diplomactic chit”?

another words, it decreases from your side one level…

GG

when a neutral is attacked by you  it immediatly becomes a full bar ally of the nearest enemy player. They have full use of it: economics, military

@Imperious:

+++ i still used the base map (original) but tracing was done with some minor considerations. The opening is large to show its easy to move into the balkans w/o looking too weird… (like a flood occured)

oh, like 2nd edition map or something? cos it looks different to revised
opening is large to show its easy to move into balkans? move into Balkans from where?

hows the “no Italy map” coming along?
added VC in yet?

have you adjusted the Turkey area so its easily seen you can move from Balkans in Turkey?
and add the canal “double line” and position it so its clear you need control of Turkey to go into Black Sea…

I will start on it this weekend…

I will add an arrow to show linkage for turkey

canal for suez and panama will have those lines

actually turkey should be the same treatment as suez … hence it should get the canal lines…

yeah whats what I meant
it should be the “double red lines” canal symbol
since thats how our rules have it for Black Sea

just instead of in the middle of two territories (like Anglo-Egypt and Trans-Jordon) it’ll be  fully inside Turkey (like Panama)