Scramble to Burma?
d789da6d-4497-4038-b661-7634b8a2170b-image.png
Scramble to SZ56?
fecf92ca-dfe1-4e6c-95d8-c55e36f81f27-image.png
@simon33 Got you!
Game History
Round: 13
Purchase Units - Japanese
Japanese buy 3 destroyers, 3 fighters and 9 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 6 SuicideAttackTokens;
Combat Move - Japanese
1 infantry moved from Yunnan to Kweichow
Japanese take Kweichow from Chinese
1 infantry moved from Korea to Amur
Japanese take Amur from Russians
1 infantry moved from Anhwe to Chahar
Japanese take Chahar from Chinese
4 artilleries and 5 infantry moved from Korea to 6 Sea Zone
1 marine moved from Korea to 6 Sea Zone
1 infantry moved from Japan to 6 Sea Zone
4 artilleries, 1 battleship, 4 carriers, 2 cruisers, 1 destroyer, 4 fighters, 6 infantry, 1 marine, 4 tactical_bombers and 5 transports moved from 6 Sea Zone to 26 Sea Zone
4 artilleries, 6 infantry and 1 marine moved from 26 Sea Zone to Hawaiian Islands
Combat - Japanese
Japanese creates battle in territory 17 Sea Zone
Battle in Hawaiian Islands
Japanese attack with 4 artilleries, 6 infantry and 1 marine
Americans defend with 1 airfield, 1 artillery, 1 harbour and 1 infantry
Japanese roll dice for 1 battleship and 2 cruisers in Hawaiian Islands, round 2 : 2/3 hits, 1,67 expected hits
Americans roll dice for 1 artillery and 1 infantry in Hawaiian Islands, round 2 : 0/2 hits, 0,67 expected hits
1 infantry owned by the Americans and 1 artillery owned by the Americans lost in Hawaiian Islands
Japanese win, taking 17 Sea Zone from ANZAC, taking Hawaiian Islands from Americans with 4 artilleries, 6 infantry and 1 marine remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7
Casualties for Americans: 1 artillery and 1 infantry
Non Combat Move - Japanese
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Removing units owned by Japanese from 26 Sea Zone: 3 tactical_bombers
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode
3 fighters moved from Japan to 26 Sea Zone
1 mech_infantry moved from Manchuria to Anhwe
1 infantry moved from Kwangsi to Hunan
2 armour moved from Hunan to Yunnan
6 infantry moved from Kwangsi to Yunnan
3 infantry moved from French Indo China to 36 Sea Zone
1 infantry moved from Kwangsi to 36 Sea Zone
4 infantry and 3 transports moved from 36 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone
2 infantry moved from Malaya to 37 Sea Zone
6 infantry and 3 transports moved from 37 Sea Zone to 35 Sea Zone
6 infantry moved from 35 Sea Zone to Philippines
1 destroyer moved from 36 Sea Zone to 43 Sea Zone
1 destroyer moved from 36 Sea Zone to 44 Sea Zone
1 destroyer moved from 36 Sea Zone to 45 Sea Zone
1 battleship, 10 carriers and 6 submarines moved from 36 Sea Zone to 35 Sea Zone
1 aaGun, 9 artilleries and 29 infantry moved from West India to India
1 destroyer moved from 17 Sea Zone to 34 Sea Zone
2 fighters and 2 tactical_bombers moved from 36 Sea Zone to India
2 fighters and 2 tactical_bombers moved from 36 Sea Zone to India
6 fighters and 6 tactical_bombers moved from 36 Sea Zone to 35 Sea Zone
Place Units - Japanese
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Adding units owned by Japanese to 35 Sea Zone: 3 tactical_bombers
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode
1 destroyer placed in 39 Sea Zone
2 fighters placed in India
3 infantry placed in Malaya
3 infantry placed in French Indo China
3 infantry placed in Korea
2 destroyers placed in 6 Sea Zone
1 fighter placed in Japan
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode
Turn Complete - Japanese
Japanese collect 62 PUs; end with 62 PUs
Objective Japanese 6 Home Islands: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 65 PUs
Objective Japanese 3 Control Honolulu Or Sydney Or Calcutta Or Western United States: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 10 PUs; end with 75 PUs
Combat Hit Differential Summary :
Americans regular : -0,67
Japanese regular : 0,33
@pejon_88 said in Pejon_88 (X) vs. Simon33 (Allies+16), 3rd game:
@simon33 Got you!
Oh bother. I may have forgotten a blocker there. Perhaps I’m missing something, but I don’t think so.
Ok, result posted. Not a good feeling, think I should have won that one.
@simon33 The “got you” was meant as a comment that I understood how you posted your turn and not as a result of your forgotten blocker, sorry about the misunderstanding.
I see you already posted the result, but I am inclined especially since you allowed the late changes with Germany some turns ago to let you adjust. What’s your thoughts on this?
It is normally frowned upon to unwind rolled dice. I guess that battle isn’t exactly decided on dice though.
So you would re-do the Japanese turn with an ANZAC DD in SZ25? Are you sure?
@simon33 I am a little divided. On one hand we can argue that it is a no brainer move to put it there, on the other hand it is part of the game to actually do the move hehe. My philosophy is generally to be forgiving since I usually get the same response from other players, you included obviously. I know how I personally would feel if I made a mistake like that so yeah sure I will redo Japan.
@simon33 I have been struggling with my conscience over the past days about re-doing Japan… I know I said I would do so, but having looked at the map again for the first time since I played them last, it is a really hard decision since it would probably greatly affect my ranking next year. So would it for you of course. Last thing I want to create here is any bad blood for the future, everything else is secondary in my opinion. I agree that Allies seem to have started getting a grip on things, but anything could probably happen going forward from here.
Anyway, I just now came up with a solution that is kind of a win-win in this case. What do think we say it is a draw that does not gets recorded (don’t know if that is allowed?). We could leave it at that or do a re-game for example?
Yeah, I am happy with a draw for this game.
@simon33 Ok, then let’s decide on that! I think that is fair. Think our games are intense! Re-match BM3 or PTV?
Appreciate your sportsmanship on that one, beyond the call of duty, I think.
I’d prefer PTV but bid for Axis?
I’ll start at 16.
@simon33 yeah, guess it was a mix of of things that made it quite reasonable to call it a draw.
I have limited experience with PTV, never played Allies for one haha, so I don’t know what a reasonable bid is? Are you saying that Axis needs a bid in PTV?
A substantial one. I’m currently playing Adam514 with him playing Axis+4 and feel like I am winning. May well be wrong though!
@simon33 Wow ok. Playing Wizmark right now with him Allies+6. But if you say so! How do we know for sure. Maybe ask these guys? @Adam514 @regularkid do you have any advice?
They don’t really agree with me.
@simon33 Ok. Axis +10
Axis are yours.
@simon33 Axis have the income advantage already in our game.
@simon33 Game setup in a new thread.
@adam514 said in Pejon_88 (X) vs. Simon33 (Allies+16), 3rd game:
@simon33 Axis have the income advantage already in our game.
Yeah, was thinking that there must be something. Last Japanese turn the Axis extended a fair bit. With the units I lost early, should really be a loss.