G40 Balance Mod - Feedback Thread

It saves you the trouble of getting rid of the French fleet. That not only saves you one sub on average (or dd, depending what you send), it also frees up the Italian planes to do some other important stuff.
It gives you 3 free inf in North Africa, which is worth 9 IPC. And you don’t need to send a transport there, which you usually can’t defend.

It gives you the opportunity to land in TRJ or even Syria, really threatening Cairo and Iraq at the same time.

IPC-wise, it’s already a huge boost in the first 2-3 rounds. But more importantly, Italian units are very scarce at the beginning - but lots of stuff to do. Greece, Gibraltar, Malta, North Africa, Cairo, Syria, clearing the med - these are all goals Italy ideally wants to achieve within 3 turns. But that’s not really possible without Vichy, because you just can’t spread your units so much.

How often am I sacrificing a transport in the regular version, just to get Morocco for the bonus, for example…

@regularkid:

Aight. I can dig that. We got another problem though. If the UK plane in souther France is destroyed when the territory goes Vichy, what happens to a UK plane in French West Africa? The ability to keep that territory french is crititcal in a Vichy France scenario. Cuz it’s one of the only (if not the only) safe way for uk to to get air to Egypt by round 2. What u think?

I think it could be more simple then that. If Germany meets the vichy requirement on their turn, then vichy is instuted straight away.

On the other hand, if it is up to Italy, then the UK has a choice of sending a plane to southern france or not.

I think making it a land unit is a good call, as is adding the +5 to Germany for Axis occupation of London.  Getting London is tough under the best of circumstances - there should be a reward for that.  Esp since so many of these NOs are supposed to represent morale and whatnot.

Give germans King Tigers!

what if u required an allied land unit to stop vichy, but gave the brits a marine in gib? that way they have a choice to use the marine and sacrifice the ca or burn up a tt

@regularkid:

Soulbighter, see my last post for why an immediate G1 Vichy conversion is not workable (p.s., was originally coded that way months ago, and changed after play testing revealed these gameplay issues). When u getting that BM game started?  :evil:

Also, I think I agree with the general thrust of MrRoboto’s post. Would requiring UK land units to prevent Vichy conversion allay these concerns? This way, thwarting Vichy involves sacrificing a transport and higher opportunity costs (still a reasonable option, but costlier).  Perhaps even just adding +5 for Axis control of London would be sufficient to make UK think twice before throwing fighters at the problem?

Anybody think its fine the way it is?

no more than +3 or just +2, if even……

keep in mind that taking london means another 8pc from just the territories, along with a strong strategic position loaded with air and naval bases. and of course don’t forget the huge surge in ipc like 30 or more from capturing the capitol, and also the usual 20 or more gain in tuv from the battle (usually if germany goes SL it will ensure overwhelming odds).

other NOs are usually on top of a much smaller ipc gain, for example, novg or volg.

@Shin:

I think making it a land unit is a good call, as is adding the +5 to Germany for Axis occupation of London.� Getting London is tough under the best of circumstances - there should be a reward for that.� Esp since so many of these NOs are supposed to represent morale and whatnot.

@axis-dominion:

no more than +3 or just +2, if even……

keep in mind that taking london means another 8pc from just the territories, along with a strong strategic position loaded with air and naval bases. and of course don’t forget the huge surge in ipc like 30 or more from capturing the capitol, and also the usual 20 or more gain in tuv from the battle (usually if germany goes SL it will ensure overwhelming odds).

other NOs are usually on top of a much smaller ipc gain, for example, novg or volg.

@Shin:

I think making it a land unit is a good call, as is adding the +5 to Germany for Axis occupation of London.� Getting London is tough under the best of circumstances - there should be a reward for that.� Esp since so many of these NOs are supposed to represent morale and whatnot.

London is considerably harder to hold by Germany in Balance Mod since US can liberate UK without the fear of Germany plundering UK income again. In my opinion +5 is probably just right.

Yes.  The fact that you can’t just take and retake those IPCs makes even fairly desperate liberation attempts a pretty sound policy.  Germany needs the +5.

My only fear with the +5 is it might be making sea lion too appealing to resist even without the UK ftr loss.  Russia is such a bear now why not shoot for sealion 4 or maybe even 5 as an every game option…

A third option could be that if vichy requirements are met any turn after turn 1 that you ignore the, “3. There are no non-french, Allied units in Southern France.”  If at any french turn after turn1 there are allied units in southern france the territory becomes hostile, but since germany cannot move into southern france, the ftr/units get a turn to move out and all they have accomplished is delaying vichy 1 turn.  Probably too hard to code though…

This might be worth testing, but maybe giving the Japanese a minor in kiangsi or manchuria at start of the game might be an idea.

@regularkid:

We’ve tried to avoid changing unit starting setup for reasons discussed above (that’s what bids are for).

Jdow take you up on yer offer of a game yet?

JDOW and I are going to play a non league BM game soon.

I’d say it’s a bit on the weak side, but I’m fine with it.

One thought that occurs to me, perhaps the Germans could get 3 IPCs for any round where the Atlantic did not have transports?  Historically, U-Boats sinking commercial shipping was pretty important.

Hrm.  Maybe Germans can get a bonus of 3 IPCs anytime their U-Boats are convoying in the Atlantic?