@lydian
WE have done on our own longtime ago based on the xeno game but we change the rules, map and chart.278999193_2826327174327899_1594387835970128913_n.jpg 278671828_728074555207246_8848699411888115333_n.jpg 279156672_3237479476496915_4160741075211625688_n.jpg
Rome Total war 2
-
Maybe. I was happy playing Napoleon one on one battles with a friend. They worked well.
Need more confidence with the units in this one, but why not!
Will be weeks though, as I have a lot on with work at the moment. -
played a lot of single battles with a friend, too, was great fun and a challenge.
-
The annoying thing was the aggressor usually lost. If it gave us good defensive ground, you wanted to sit and wait. Well you cannot both do that!
We had an understanding that meant we took it in turns to attack. -
you are right. Unless the combination of arms was perfectly fitting. But mostly I remember Roman artillerly killing my advancing hordes.
-
I’ve played most of Total War games and was thoroughly disappointed with Napoleon Total War, I hope this one is nothing like it. I’m pleased that they have chosen to make another game about Rome. But Medieval TW 2 is my favourite of the franchise. I made wonders with cavalry in this game. By the way, that was a poor deployment of your troops, full of redundant actions.