• Well maybe she meant when theres a possibility to lose an aircraft for not much gain.

  • 2007 AAR League

    I’ll also retreat if I don’t have enough strength left to safely hold the new territory - if that was the initial purpose of the attack. If however as in Egypt or China my objective is to kill a Ftr, then I don’t care what I lose (except my own air units of course).


  • i agree with froodster (shocking i know  :lol:)
    what is the point of winning the battle if you get wiped out in a counter and it costs you the war  :?
    i think the art of strafing (especially in europe) is often the deciding factor.  too bad you cant retreat non-amphib’d units when doing off shores :-(

  • 2007 AAR League

    Yeah, I think strafing (or knowing when to) is a critical part of risk management.

  • 2007 AAR League

    OK.

    How many people keep track of Count, Punch and Skew as the rounds progress?

    Played a game last night FTF (actually it is still unfinished) and toward the end I was actually redoing the C,P&S value calculations after each round of attacks.

    Of course, that does not mean I was making good decisions.  :cry:

    Axis (no Bid) vs Allies still going after 5 rounds.  Axis held a Minor Victory from Turn 1, but now has lost Karelia at Turn 5.  It may go down hill from here…


  • Never retreat! Never surrender!


  • @Sankt:

    Never retreat! Never surrender!

    the way you have me libetaing china for you mr. us i would think your motto was never enage never attack.  :lol:

    • Mr. russia

  • @cyan:

    @Sankt:

    Never retreat! Never surrender!

    the way you have me libetaing china for you mr. us i would think your motto was never enage never attack.  :lol:

    • Mr. russia

    LOL, I know I wanted you to attack china but that was before Japan had moved. I would never have you go banzai with a pack of infantry for the sake of taking out 2 jap inf. And with the counter bound to come it’s not going to look so good for the allies.  :cry:

  • '19 Moderator

    I never go as far as doing calculations, I get enough of that at work.  But I do re-evaluate the attack every turn.  I weigh the cost vs. effect vs. expected outcomes.

  • 2007 AAR League

    What do you look at to measure cost, effect and expected outcome?

    Count, Punch and Skew is the non-computer method I use to estimate those.

    Then of course it all has to fit into the grand strategy that Pinky and I came up with…

  • '18 '17 '16 '11 Moderator

    @cyan:

    @Jennifer:

    Personally, I wish you had a result of: When it becomes likely I’ll loose aircraft.  Because I’m willing to sacrifice tanks to kill the enemy, I’m a bit more squeemish when it looks probably I’ll loose fighters.

    (ie: 1 Infantry, 1 Fighter vs 2 Infantry)

    1/3*1/3=1/9 i would risk it you have a 89% to have a favorablr outtcome.

    Using statistics sure.  Using dice, not so sure.  Tell ya what.  I’m going to perform a surgery on you.  You have an 89% chance to live if we give the surgery.  You have 100% chance to live if we don’t give you the surgery.

    Which do you choose?

    Now, if you have 2 Infantry, 1 Fighter vs 2 Infantry, you have a 100% chance of that fighter surviving.  (No way 2 defenders can get 3 hits in one round.)

  • '19 Moderator

    I think each battle is different.  What does he have to counter with?  What is the land worth strategically (IPCs)? Tactically?  I may push the battle to it’s conclusion even though I am sure I will loose if the object is to simply cause damage.  Do I have an Ally that can follow up with reinforcements?

    To many different scenarios to give a simple answer.

  • 2007 AAR League

    I retreat when it would be foolish not to.

    Ah yes, so much wisdom I have…

Suggested Topics

Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

60

Online

17.4k

Users

39.9k

Topics

1.7m

Posts