• @tekkyy:

    *use average of ppp and nominal

    that makes sense i’ll try that

    @tekkyy:

    *india and north east africa join Russia

    Pakistan, Persia, Egypt, East Africa, Equatorial Africa, Algeria, and Libya are in Russin control allready.

    I think the americans would have to do something big to piss of the indians like that. I think if India knows  China is sided wiith russia they would jion the allies. also they wouln’t be on the same side as pakistan. INdia doesn’t like those too countries very much or bangledesh.


  • But India is quite close to Russia. But anyway no big deal.
    We’ll see what the numbers are like after nominal/ppp adjustments.


  • @tekkyy:

    But India is quite close to Russia. But anyway no big deal.
    We’ll see what the numbers are like after nominal/ppp adjustments.

    its alot better now its i on the 3rd column.
    http://rapidshare.com/files/28853720/economy2.xls.html


  • japan/sz60 14
    south Korea 3
    okinawa/sz58 2
    phillpnes/sz49 2
    wake island 0
    Carolina islands 0
    India/sz35 7

    manchuria/sz61 6
    kwangtung/59 7
    china 4
    skinang 1
    indochina/sz36 2
    Borneo 1
    east Indies 1

    Eastern US/sz10 16
    Western US/sz55 14
    Central US 8
    Alaska/sz52 1
    Hawaii/sz52 0
    Midway island 0
    Mexico 3
    Brazil 3
    Peru 1
    Argentina/sz25 0
    Israel/sz34 2
    Saudi Arabia 2

    Moscow 3
    kareila/sz5 3
    caucasus 2
    archangel
    novosribirsk 1
    kazakh 1
    evenki
    yukut
    soviet far east/sz62
    buryatia 1
    belrussia
    ukraine 1
    west russia
    Persia 2
    Egypt 1
    East Africa
    Equatorial Africa 1
    Algeria 1
    Libya
    west Indies
    Venezuela 1

    UK/sz7 7
    Spain 4
    France/sz13 7
    Germany 10
    Italy/sz14 5
    eastern europe 2
    Balkans 1
    eastern canada/sz1 2
    western Canada 1
    Norway 2
    Sweden 0
    west Africa 1
    Congo 0
    Rhodesia 0
    Angola 0
    Mozambique 0
    south Africa 2
    Madagascar 0
    giblater 0
    Australia 2
    Solomon islands 0
    new guinea 0
    new Zealand 0
    turkey 1

    Japan 28
    china 22
    USA 50
    Russia 18
    Europe 48


  • @tekkyy:

    But India is quite close to Russia. But anyway no big deal.

    only resaon is that india would not jion russia if china was its ally or if pakistan was on its side. from my understandig  india was more of a russian ally in the cold war and akistan was american. but since then it is reverseing. we mangaed to piss pakistan off in afgahastan, and improve relations with india (nuclear weopons deal). india is becoming more like serouis compantion for china every day and the border of india and china is porrly planned so india and china disagree often.


  • Talk of weapaons, Russia sells India more lethal jets than they sell to China.
    I guess it depends on how many neutrals you want really. (And whether you’ll have a diplomacy house rule.)


  • these are the revised rules and i’ve decided on going with tekkyy’s idea with india being on the same side as russia. thanks for the help. i reworded some of the rules too.( few changes like 1 missle for battleships now but nothing huge)

    current rules:
    Victory cities:
    Allies : 7
    US: 3
    DC ( EUS)
    Los angles (WUS)
    Mecca ( saudia arabia)

    Europe: 2
    London ( UK)
    Berlin ( Germany)

    Japan: 2
    Tokoyo ( japan)
    Seoul ( south korea)

    Axis: 7
    China: 4
    Beijing (manchuria)
    Shanghia (Kwantung)
    Urumqi (Sinkiang)
    Jakarta (Boreno)

    Russia: 3
    Moscow ( Russia)
    St. Petersburg (karelia)
    Tehran (Persia)

    Destroyers
    Destroyers also have the function to act as AA guns against Missile Strikes and Cruise Missiles Destroyers defend against these attacks at a 1 for each missile fired into a sea zone that contains destroyers.  Only one destroyer can defend in each sea zone against missile attacks.

    Dog FightingAir unit’s fire in opening-fire fire.
    While both sides have air units these air units fight with dog fighting values(2/2).
    Air units’ hits must be first allocated on air units. the only exemption to this rule is that Bombers attack ground units at 3 or less but can still be hit by air units. when only one side has air units the units fight with normal combat value.

    Bombers
    They defend on a 1 during all combat including dog fighting.  Bombers can not participate in a dog fight as the attacker.  During strategic bombing bombers may be escorted (see more at scramble against bombers).  Bombers can carry 1 infantry unit into battle or in non-combat move phase.  If so the bomber cannot attack during this turn.

    Scramble (against missiles)
    Fighters may defend against missiles that enter its territory on a 2 or less this includes combat and non combat movement.  This missile does not have to stop in that particular territory.  This combat only lasts 1 round.  Fighters cannot scramble if they participate in a dogfight.  They can not opt out of a dogfight either.

    Scramble (against bombers)
    Fighters may defend against bombers(s) at a 2 or less.  The attacker may escort the bomber(s) with fighters.  If the attacker chooses do this it becomes just like a dog fight but only lasts for 1 round and the defender is not restricted to how many fighters will scramble.  If a dog fight is occurring in the territory the bomber(s) stop at, they just “tag” along.  They leave after the first round (when they strategic bomb) of combat and do not count towards the dog fight count.

    Missile Strike
    AA guns fire 1 missile at 3 spaces or less and can target a specific unit or IPCs.  AA guns in a territory defend as appropriate.  Missile hits at 3 or less.  Destroyers defend against missiles at a 1.

    Cruise missiles – Battleships can now fire 1 cruise missiles up to 3 spaces at a 4 or less.  If cruise missiles are used, the battleship cannot take part in combat.  A cruise missile can attack a specific unit or target IPC production.  AA guns in a territory defend as appropriate.  Destroyers defend at 1 for sea units.

    http://rapidshare.com/files/32052485/economy2.xls.html ( go to sheet 1) [gave wrong link before sorry]


  • yeah 1 cruise missile would be better as you allow targetting of units

    too many standoff attacks turn the game into nuclear warefare
    which would be hardly a game


  • I just bought IMP games East /West which is WW3 in 1948. Once i get the rules… ill post some of the ideas. I think i’m gonna work on my own version of WW3.


  • You mean like the Cold War yeah?
    Well I think that one was a lot more diplomactic.


  • Once i get this IMP games east & west thing… ill have a better picture.

    It will be a new global map probably 1984-5 timeframe.

    Using table tactics modern and risk 2010 pieces as well as normal AA pieces.

    Yea diplomatic rolls and ICBM’s are in it. I want it to be possible for the world to blow up…and the survivors have to fight on… post -nuclear disaster style.

    but the primary way would be by conventional means.

    I just need alot of mushroom cloud plastic pieces… where you get them? Supremacy: the board game?


  • IL, that game idea of yours sounds really cool,
    post some more about it
    I too bought a copy of East&West, but I was disapointed buy the limted econamic damge and range of nuclear weapons.


  • How do they work? What is the cost and ability of these weapons?


  • There are three sperate tech levels for Nukes

    the least adcanced must be carried by bomber and kill five units + destroys one IPC that round.

    The most advacned may me fired from three spaces away and kill ten units + destroys 2 IPC

    In my opion Nukes should destroy all units and IPC in a region.


  • Im tinkering with this very same idea at the moment. I just got the rules and understand them. They are really fun looking and i cant wait to play.  In my own variant i think its best to roll either to attack units or reduce military production.

    1. if you attack the territories value roll one D4= lost permanent value.

    2. if you attack units roll D6 or D8 = lost units

    I plan on using those mushroom clouds from supremacy board game. I got some nifty counters from a milton bradley game for ICBM’s and Tac. Nukes.


  • @Emperor_Taiki:

    There are three sperate tech levels for Nukes

    the least adcanced must be carried by bomber and kill five units + destroys one IPC that round.

    The most advacned may me fired from three spaces away and kill ten units + destroys 2 IPC

    In my opion Nukes should destroy all units and IPC in a region.

    here are my rules for aa, missiles destroy factory in that terrotory and stop economic production. once you buy a ic  this is all undone. nukes are used in stragic bombing not agianst armies so no lost of units… they are subject to being intrecepted though.


  • @Imperious:

    Once i get this IMP games east & west thing… ill have a better picture.

    It will be a new global map probably 1984-5 timeframe.

    Using table tactics modern and risk 2010 pieces as well as normal AA pieces.

    Yea diplomatic rolls and ICBM’s are in it. I want it to be possible for the world to blow up…and the survivors have to fight on… post -nuclear disaster style.

    but the primary way would be by conventional means.

    I just need alot of mushroom cloud plastic pieces… where you get them? Supremacy: the board game?

    i just saw the map for the game and it is great inculding the korea’s and the middle east. assuming you have 3 ipc infantry, then all the terrotories value should average at to almost 3( or the cost of your basic infantry.)  this should only be the average not the mode. 0 ipc tertories don’t count. there is a bunch of 1985 scenerios out. so to give you an idea. the runeblade one and http://www.wargamer.com/axisandallies/CE/XENO/WAW/scenarios/waw_scenario_warsaw_page1.html.


  • destroy next turns IPCs? or destroy all IPC production?


  • @tekkyy:

    destroy next turns IPCs? or destroy all IPC production?


  • destroy next turns IPCs? or destroy all IPC production?

    I think since the income basis is decided at the start of your turn, then if the A bomb hit on your opponents turn and it was directed against the IPC… then its your current turns income. Destroy all income is a bit harsh. The third path is to allow a return of IPC to a rate of 1 IPC per turn but its too much accounting.

    Basically attack military or attack economic. Both are permanent.

Suggested Topics

  • 7
  • 4
  • 3
  • 9
  • 1
  • 45
  • 11
  • 27
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

141

Online

17.3k

Users

39.9k

Topics

1.7m

Posts