6 Infantry, 2 Artillery, from S.Germany into Slovakia
How about using those to strafe Yugo for 1 round and then retreat into: Slovakia.
Does Italy need this help?
What are the loss / kill chances?It’s a common practice, but if you are attacking Russia round 1, you can’t take the chance that you accidentally score 5 hits and conquer Yugo since you need those units for counter attacks on G2.
Correct, Italy can easily take Yugoslavia on their own round 2 or 3 without Germany spreading thin by strafing G1.
Russia is too strong in Alpha 2+
-
Jim on about 5 occassions, I’ve really been able to deeply experience this “Russian Strength” Enigma.
I agree with your position.
What I keep finding is that Russia seems to just have 8 to 10 more infantry than can be beaten or matched. One of three things happens…
1. The Germans beat the Russians because Russia obsesses with defending both the north and south at once (Nov + Ukr or Cau)
2. Germany beats the Russians, because they error, present a medium stack, and the axis player is able to get an edge out of them in the terms of 7 to 10 infantry, evening the playing field.
3. The Germans lose. Out stacked and ill equiped, the game drags out - japan wins, or axis lose.
The only way I can see correcting this with the current setup, is through a significant change in play style, A superior integration of Axis airpower onto the eastern front with ground assaults “could” present this possibility… The Axis Arrowhead strategy I presented in another thread (IE for every 1 italian bomber on the board, the russians have to leave 1 to 2 infantry more in a territory to stop canopener blitzing) This with support from starting German planes could make the difference perhaps?? But I maintain that I think the Russians have atleast 10 too many infantry during G4/5/6 - atleast that’s what my gut tells me.
Even when I’ve played a strategy of an “Offensive defensive” Axis game, where though moving my stack forward - through a series of half moves, strategic attack/retreats, position holds, mixed air coverage for maximum D. I’ve found that even with having a Defenders edge, against a primary Russian attack, it’s a hard game to win out there for the Axis… And god forbid you look at the odds if you ATTACK a Russian primary stack…
A last and final note, I’ve found that Italian success in the middle east / africa, or hell even egypt, go a LONG way to relieving german pressures to commit units to the west. Sometimes giving the axis that required boost agains the reds, and opening up those NO’s in Persia/Iraq. Any strategies on how that is accomplished? I don’t see many… seeing as the British have the initiave and move BEFORE The italians all game :S.
What do you propose?
-
My issue with the stance that Russia is “too strong” is that limiting Russia makes for shorter games and removes much option for alternative strategies and simply promotes a Russia-rush.
Which are some of the last things I want for this game.I think that the reason people feel Russia is too strong, is that Axis can’t eliminate Russia “fast enough” before the rest of the allies (mainly USA) becomes too much of a factor - and not that Axis can’t eliminate Russia period - in which case it isn’t really Russia which is too strong.
-
that´s it! not fast enough…
because a lot of people still invest in normal infantry only! this unit is too slow! germany has not enough time for playing around. it needs to follow a direct course to moscow, no deviation of money in any way is permitted, imho.
which means: build mech, build tank, focus on russia! i made astonishing experiences with this. so much flexibility in moving builds up an enormous pressure on russia round by round.
but this attack has to begin on G2!this keeps the allies more sweating than fighting the seas or anything else.
rock`n roll
-
I find Germany kind of has to pick it’s poison when it goes into Russia. If it buys all slow units to maximize the amount of units it can buy it just can not get a big enough stack into Russia fast enough. Then on the other hand if Germany buys fast units to rush Moscow the Germans can endup outnumbered big time if Russia is buying mostly infantry and artillery.
Then there is the fact the Germany has to worry about UK London also, who I think the Germans can keep at bay but it does not end there. There is also mega America that can very quickly threathen Germany and Italy with planes, bombers, and transports.
I have tried rushing Moscow as fast as possible and was even able to sack it but I had to do it at the expense of not growing the German economy like I needed and watching Italy get kicked out of Africa with authority. I still had to concede the game.
I think Russia needs to get weaker or Italy needs to be allowed to play and be somewhat of a force. The third option would be to add units to Germany.
-
I think Russia needs to get weaker or Italy needs to be allowed to play and be somewhat of a force. The third option would be to add units to Germany.
I agree with this.
If someone has a game that shows how it is done, would you mind providing the link to your game?
CHeers
-
@rock`n:
that´s it! not fast enough…
because a lot of people still invest in normal infantry only! this unit is too slow! germany has not enough time for playing around. it needs to follow a direct course to moscow, no deviation of money in any way is permitted, imho.
which means: build mech, build tank, focus on russia! i made astonishing experiences with this. so much flexibility in moving builds up an enormous pressure on russia round by round.
but this attack has to begin on G2!this keeps the allies more sweating than fighting the seas or anything else.
rock`n roll
Like
-
Is Russia too strong ? Maybe in E40, but i’m not sure in Global. I have cracked it at least half a dozen times with Germany, and some of my oponents were as skilled as me (or as unskilled as me lol !).
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=23428.0
Here is a typical game : US has been spending massively in the pacific, and indeed, my japanese are having a bad time, even with the help of a big Italian fleet. But in the last few turns, i’ve been pumping more units in Russia with just Germany than Russian can create each round. The result is a position where Russia is going to fall within 4 to 6 more turns. Seems a long time, but i don’t really see how it could be prevented or what the allies could to to prevent an Axis win (if they don’t finish up the japs, they will rise again).Also, what i’m finding, is that most of the players are USED to be able to put some good pressure on Russia in just 2 or 3 turns maximum. It has been the case from ALL the previous versions of A&A, and so people think that what they have done in every other AA version can be applied easily in GLOBAL. I think it’s the most common mistake i can observe in my global games. This global map is bigger than any map before, and there are more units on the board in Global than in any other version before. People NEED to really think about it and adapt properly their play for this big map. Taking Russia in 6-9 rounds in Global ? Just forget about it. Doesn’t necessarily mean it’s unbalanced, it might just mean we must change our standard strategies from previous AA games and come with new ones.
Just my 2 cents on that subject. That said, i admid i might very well be wrong and maybe Russia is too strong. I’m just not convinced of that yet.
-
i think there is no other way than taking russia in 6-9 rounds. otherwise it is the end for germany, for sure.
you buy for four turns absolutely only stuff for russia, fast units. no infantry! on turn four it could be tricky, because you have to decide whether you buy defensivly or not. depends on the russian player. the US cannot be able to pressure germany before turn 5. the UK not before turn 4. so there is plenty of time to fulfill the one task germany has.i agree with you, axisplaya, that people should get more familiar with this huge map and adapt their moves to it! i like its huge size. better than any version before. and you are right in demanding to leave “old” standard strategies - which meant investing mostly in foot-soldiers, imho.
@jim10:
i did not play in this forum, but it worked well what i have tried in a f2f-game, even with a russia not-weakened. if you want an explanation, i can tell you.greetings
-
i agree with rock’n roll. fast units are what takes Moscow. mech tanks and air are what win you the eastern front. i don’t necessarily thing that they are too strong, usually in our games, Germany’s knocking on at least Stalingrad an/or Moscow with Leningrad usually under German control.
-
@rock`n:
i think there is no other way than taking russia in 6-9 rounds. otherwise it is the end for germany, for sure.
NO. Sorry, but no. Just NO.
See ? This is exactly the kind of attitude i was talking about in my post. You come to play Global with the conceptions of previous AA games, where what you say was right.
It ain’t in Global. -
Russia is well represented.
-
The battle on the eastern front is not a quick easy win. If it was easy the Axis would win every time. Like the rest of the game you have to out think your oppenent to achieve victory. You have to hit them where they do not expect and you have to be careful to protect your front.
I have had little difficulty cracking the red army shell. You have to be careful and calculated. The few times I have not taken moscow was due to either mistakes or bad luck. Russia is not too strong but strong enough that victory is not assured and you actually have out-play the russians to take moscow just like they have to out-play you to keep you from taking moscow.
-
I don’t get how everyone is killing Russia with fast units and planes. Aren’t you ending up way outnumbered when the Soviets focus on cost effective infantry and artillery? And if the planes are being used extensively on the eastern front doesn’t that mean UK can start doing landings on German soil as the Air Force is not there to keep them honest? That doesn’t even begin to address the nightmares the US can cause for the Axis just by heading to Gibraltar.
The past ten games I have played have resulted in Allied wins and it does not matter who is playing which side. Our group has seen the Allies win by reducing Italy to irrelevant quickly and we have also seen the Allies win by messing up Japan’s day first as well.
-
This is off topic, but wouldn’t it be cool if commander units could produce a few infantry a turn in the territory they are currently in (reorganization of disbanded units). I might try this when I get FMG pieces.
Back on topic…All the games I played (probably not as many as you guys) it seems like I can’t get enough enough units deep into Russia to threaten Moscow. Even when I build fast units eventually it takes a few turns to get them to the front lines and I don’t want to slow down my advance because I feel like I have the russians on their heals, but eventually I will get just a little too deep too soon and Russia will bounce back and take out a bunch of expensive tanks and mechs. (mostly tanks by that time since I took the mechs as casualties in previous battles).
I like how much money Russia has, but I think Germany needs a little more since they have to buy expensive units to push into Russia.
-
I don’t get how everyone is killing Russia with fast units and planes. Aren’t you ending up way outnumbered when the Soviets focus on cost effective infantry and artillery?
I am. I certainly buy some tanks, but find I have to keep up with the Russian stack as well.
And if the planes are being used extensively on the eastern front doesn’t that mean UK can start doing landings on German soil as the Air Force is not there to keep them honest? That doesn’t even begin to address the nightmares the US can cause for the Axis just by heading to Gibraltar.
Yup. I usually need my planes witin range of UK seazones (if there was no Sealion), or Gibraltar. Effectively removing them from Russia. I bring them in when I am ready to make my final push, but find I’m outnumbered.
The past ten games I have played have resulted in Allied wins and it does not matter who is playing which side. Our group has seen the Allies win by reducing Italy to irrelevant quickly and we have also seen the Allies win by messing up Japan’s day first as well.
-
I’m seeing a number of Russian threads pop up now. Maybe we should pick one and keep the discussions contained.
-
A few things to consider :
#1). Has anyone tried building a Major IC in Romania, combined with moving units from Germany north through Pol and Bal. The Major IC in Rum moves units through Bes and Sukr. I’ve found a two pronged attack into Russia is necessary. Most German players go one direction, rather than two.
#2). What about stalling the US DOW until Turn 4?
Thoughts?
-
Haven’t done 1 yet. I am in the process of 2, however. Trying to do a Russia forst all out and see if I can crack it, or come close.
-
Try building a major IC in Romania on Turn 2. Attack Russia on Turn 3. Used a two prong attack. You might find different results.
-
I’ll give it a shot, but dong a rush on Moscow form turn 2 (I even took Leningrad turn 2 via 3 TTs), and it looks like I will get stalled in Bela.
In a different game I have 11 TTs but took Lenin instead turn 3 with 22 units. That one may work out better, but only because I probably rattled my opponent.
Suggested Topics
