Ok to refute the argument on LL is less complex, um, there about the same.
With dice you do what you do praying the dice don’t take a dump on you, sending in more units than needed is still wasteful because the dice could just take a larger dump on you. With LL I have to be more aware of strafes, as well as cascading dice failure is a huge issue in LL, something i regularly expose my opponents too. In LL I have true risk management when i send either a DD and a fig at that sub, or a DD and a bomber. Or 2 inf and a fig to trade, or 2 inf and a bomber against that 1 inf. 2 inf + 1 bomb vs 2 inf in LL can turn into me loosing both inf, I still have your ‘risk management’ to deal with.
With dice I just hope for the best, I have no true control over what the dice will do. In LL i have to choose to send the extra units to ensure the result, or not to. I cannot begin to tell you the number of battles that come down to that AA gun hitting, but they do exist. Or the time when my DD+fig missed that sub and it hit, then sunk a tranny next turn.
They are different styles, and neither is the ‘correct’ one, how about we all stop arguing over it. Its like watching a political debate.