• “Axis & Allies MB” is my favourite, too.


  • My suggestion:

    Axis & Allies (Classic) 1st/2nd/3rd Editions

    and for the description:

    Published by Milton Bradley (1984/1986) and Hasbro (1998), retroactively known as Classic

    Probably, then, updating all other games’ descriptions, to tell the publishers.

    Edit: Also, not all Classic editions are Milton Bradley’s. The 3rd edition, as well as the 3rd.1 edition (Iron Blitz), were published by Hasbro.


  • @Cernel Thanks for the suggestion but I think that’s too much. I’d like to keep the title more simple and add the details in the description.

    Description: Also known as Classic, includes Nova, MB Gamemaster Series, and CD-ROM 3rd Edition


  • @djensen Uhm. I’m almost sure the Nova edition is not Classic.


  • @Cernel Okay, I’ll drop Nova. If people want to talk about it they can do it in “Other”


  • You might want to consider the fact that the description will have to go in the moment you would put it as a subforum, since, popularity aside, that would make the most sense, if more recent main/successor out-of-print games (Revised and Spring 1942) are already out of main page.


  • I think that numbers 5 and 6, from the numbered list, work best as a title for the Milton Bradley edition.

    That said, I would keep the Nova Games edition out of the description of the Milton Bradley edition. The Nova Games edition had many differences from the Milton Bradley edition (different map, combat rules, and turn structure, just off the top of my head) and conflating them helps no one.

    My 2 IPCs.

    -Midnight_Reaper


  • @Cernel There’s a few reasons why I don’t think I’ll ever put it in a sub-forum.

    1. Page rank. The deeper you bury a page, the more it won’t show up in Google searches.

    2. Reverence and nostalgia. This is the game that started it all. Sure, the Nova version was first but by and far the MB version is the first one many of us played.

    3. People still play this despite owning more recent versions, including tournaments. A lot of the other versions don’t get much play. There is an argument to move D-Day to the top level as well. IIRC, D-Day is listed on the AH Wizard’s site.


  • Okay everyone, I was looking up the release date for Revised (2004) and the Wikipedia page refers to the original as Classic. Sorry but the case is now closed. I was starting to like MB but this is also what Larry calls it on his forums but IMO with excessive use of colons.

  • '17 '16

    Ah man, i started this and didn’t even get to vote… I was going to say 1-3 was ick, but I was okay with anything from 4 through 7.

    So… what will it be again… “Axis & Allies Classic”?


  • @Wolfshanze Yeah, like I said MB was growing on me especially because the the nostalgia factor. If you played this game you definitely remember that MB prominently in the upper left corner.

    But I guess it was decided by Larry some time back to call it Classic. I can ask Wizards what they call it internally, if anything. If there is something official, maybe we can get them to put out an official “statement” via an interview or something. But for now, it’s Classic.

Suggested Topics

Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

261

Online

17.3k

Users

39.9k

Topics

1.7m

Posts