AARHE: Phase 3: Revised NA's

  • Moderator

    Folgore? I didn’t mention it… I was mentioning Bersaglieri…

    GG


  • Ok heres the skinny:

    Italy had what is called mobile “Celere” divisions

    they formed 3 of them before the war.

    they also had other elite divisions called:
    101 trieste
    102 trento

    these were also mobile.

    The Folgore thing was a parachute division ( i was mixed up on that) they had another called 184 nembo =total of 2

    They also have 6 mountain divisions

    and 5 blackshirt divisions and 7 african divisions

    69 infantry divisions served during the war with the axis.

    also 5 armored divisions.

    thats it for the army.

    come up with a name that reflects military units they had.


  • Great to see lots of ideas.
    Just need to catch up on the rule changes already in AARHE and convert the wording accordingly.

  • Moderator

    Nationalist Support: Once per game, at the beginning of Italy’s turn it may declare Nationalist Support. All its land units cost -1
    Pact of Steel: During your place Units phase you may convert 1 German unit on any of Italy’s IC’s to Italian.


  • Comments noted.


  • @Guerrilla:

    Nationalist Support: Once per game, at the beginning of Italy’s turn it may declare Nationalist Support. All its land units cost -1

    When making “National Advantages” we ended up with some “National Units” as already in the draft. They are reduced costs for production of certain units due the nation’s policy and economies of scale.

    However we quickly saw an unrealistic side effect. Players saving up.
    Hence we introduced limits as they are in the draft now.

    Not sure if it matters here though.

    Pact of Steel: During your place Units phase you may convert 1 German unit on any of Italy’s IC’s to Italian.

    Is this at Germany player’s discretion?

  • Moderator

    yes… You wouldn’t give your equipment up for nothing…

    GG


  • I like “Pact of steel” except not the way its mandated. Id like something like a free loan from germany where italy can buy any land unit w/o paying for it. Losing a german unit for an Italian one is not much of an NA. Remember they both move together. Germany does not lose any money in the deal. It represents the support of the German military machine and military advisors training new Italian soldiers… any ideas?


  • yeah the free loan method would see diplomacy at work

    even more exciting if we cater for the different cases where powers switch sides now that we have national victory (national goals) but thats too complicated


  • What if we give Italy some sort of a Lend-Lease NA instead of Pact of Steel


  • can you elaborate? what is the idea?

  • Moderator

    I think he is referring to cash exchange instead of units… I would be willing to do that… Unit wise does make it very wishy-washy if no one is certain that an Italian BB is going to appear out of nowhere… 10 IPC’s exchange? Enough for a fighter?

    GG


  • ok so a one time free loan of 10 ipc to italy… Yep that could work.


  • @Imperious:

    can you elaborate? what is the idea?

    GG said it all


  • Ok thats good… hows that list coming? ( e.g. the NA list?)


  • yeah sounds about right

    @Guerrilla:

    Unit wise does make it very wishy-washy if no one is certain that an Italian BB is going to appear out of nowhere…

    yeah I know wishy-washy
    although its not too bad because all the Axis move at the same time

  • 2007 AAR League

    Perhaps Italy shouldn’t have IPC’s at all - Germany can supply it with 5 IPCs, 10, 20… whatever amount the players agree upon each turn. It leads to some increased co-ordination. Mussolini did very little without Hitler’s aid.

  • Moderator

    Interesting concept, but considering that they had war “power” they should have lend lease… and income…

    GG

  • 2007 AAR League

    There power was very limited. Greece was an ‘Italian’ invasion, but German troops did quite a bit of the fighting. Germany did most of the fighting when it came to defending Italy as well. Italy may have had war ‘power’, but most of their fighting forces seem to have been German, or backed up by German units.


  • Well it was in all fairness Italian troops that shed the blood in Africa… most of the army was from Italy and led by Germans.

    BTW Italy is not just italy… it includes the balkans… which by inference = hungary, Rumania, and Bulgaria all of which had armies to fight for Germany… thats part of the viability of having an Italian player… to represent all these nations in one big ball… Italy must have its own identity and income… Germany could of course loan limited money in times of emergencies hence that “pact of steel” provision.

Suggested Topics

  • 29
  • 2
  • 5
  • 5
  • 30
  • 221
  • 3
  • 1
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

55

Online

17.5k

Users

40.1k

Topics

1.7m

Posts