@LHoffman:
I cannot help myself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8Yl-CrwtRE
Never heard of this girl before, but she’s right.
Dude, I like hockey, but you got took by a pretty face. Not to mention you could probably turn each point she made back to the NBA.
1. Close games - 5 of the 8 first round series went to game sevens in the NBA. Sure, not individual games, but you can’t compare and average of single digit scoring to high double/low triple digit scoring. Apples to oranges.
2. Pace (last minute takes forever in the NBA…) - Only in a close game. So does this invalidate point #1?
3. Team vs. Stars - I would argue the best team makes it, obviously, for each conference, and IMO, the Spurs are the more solid team. OKC had stars they had to play nearly the full duration of the game because they had an incomplete team, and didn’t make it. Additionally, I’m not sure how this makes for a “better sport” argument? Besides, the pace is fairly different for each and the NHL requires a larger group to keep up with it.
4. Intensity/Teams playing to ability - Each game counts, both leagues. There is no “you don’t have to try until the playoffs”. That’s just stupid. You have to make the playoffs first. And the “dude broke something and had a custom mask to play in hockey”? Look:
5. Unpredictability/odds - Teams that hadn’t been in years made it; for the first time ever, the Celtics, Knicks, or Lakers were not in the playoffs. The Heat vs. Spurs rematch is slightly over 50/50 in Spurs favor, even though the Heat won last year. She sarcastically “wonders” who will win, insinuating the Heat, when it went to 7 games last year and the Spurs were within a free throw of winning the championship in game 6 (that’s what you call a close game).
6. Anyone’s game (unpredictability repeated) - I believe in parity myself, and I can concede it. But I do believe the home court advantage in the NBA is HUGE, and that makes a big difference. But does it make for a better sport, the team that barely squeaks into the championship has a shot at the title, and the dominating team during the regular season goes out in the first round? Most seem to like a cinderella story, but does that mean the sport is intrinsically better?
7. Sudden death overtime - You get 5 minutes in the NBA, it might as well be. You have 5 minutes to play your best basketball. Going into overtime is pretty big for such a high scoring sport, anyway. Hockey can be deadlocked from the first period to warrant it, but not the NBA.
8. Drama - She rails on the NBA for having character drama. Well that’s the NBA for you. Fights are a luxury, not a staple. 24 hour sportsnews cycle and a popular sport will drag out tons of “stories”. I’m not saying it’s a good thing, but it’s not an actual argument to watch hockey over the NBA.
9. Trophy - And? I bet more people can identify it by sight than name, but still…what’s that have to do with watching the sport? Additionally, the NBA doesn’t identify the playoffs by the trophy, but by the sport. That may have something to do with it…
10. Ratings - “Just because a lot of people watch the NBA compared to the NHL, doesn’t mean it’s good.” Ok, so give me a reason the NHL is better? This is a wasted spot.
So…I enjoyed the view…the argument was crap though.
Here’s my rebuttal:
The NBA and NHL finals playoff games are staggered, so you don’t have to choose!!!