I said Hannibal was no Spanish, am I not correct in that statement IL?
You said it like since he was not from Spain, the attack from Spain was somehow less or that you think he was from Carthage, but he was not. That makes your point useless to any discussion.
IL says:
Quote
It was ( the 1st and 2nd Punic wars) where Hannibal the General born in Turkey ( not Spain or Carthage) commanded an army dispatched from part of the empire in what was to become Spain in an attack against Rome.
IL, you claim Hannibal the General was born in Turkey? Can you cite your sources please?
My Masters in History from Stanford says it. It is common knowledge and i don’t do your homework.
IL, you are correct in that I should have used the word sea rather than ocean. Point for you. So, where was Hannibal born again? Is this where I would say “Get it right?” Such an unfriendly statement that is…… Glad that was put to rest. And yes, it was and continues to be fun.
It does make fun discovering all your mistakes, since you know little about this period. This is where you say “sure dude” and edit out everything and come back calling me a “dick” LOL. So stupid.
The 19 years was the length of time New Cathage was a possesion of Carthage, hardly an integral part of their empire in my opinion. Again, I assert Carthage was primarily an African based empire and that an ocean….rather a sea was between Rome and Carthage proper sans their recent conquests in Spain which did not make them a European power.
The 19 years garbage is your manner of reasoning that New Carthage was somehow nothing but “bases”. It was from a coastal empire based in Europe and Africa against a republic based in Rome. You still don’t get it. The war ( at least the 1st and 2nd Punic wars) was not a war across the sea, rather it was a conflict separated by the alps and some distance ON LAND between.
The only thing true is the capital of each was across the sea, but the empires were basically close by LAND.
So get it right and stop angling out of the rope.