I do not mind the idea of switching from the Alaskan NO which probably should stay to the Mexican NO which was probably designed only to give America yet another NO (only valid game reason I can think of.)
Instead of the United States controlling Mexico, Southern Mexico, Central America (Panama Canal) and the West Indies make it so that the Allies control Morocco, Algeria, Tunis and the West Indies.
America could literally control all of those territories as well, and it gives the United States a reason (outside of just denying Italy the N. Africa NO) to take and hold Africa.
Not to mention, when in all the nine levels of hell has anyone seen America lose the West Indies or Mexico in Alpha 2? I rarely, if ever, saw it in 1940, and (except for AARe) virtually never saw it there and as for classic, you mean someone invaded the West Indies? WHY? lol. Hence why I think it was added to the game only to give America an NO and thus, moving it shouldn’t be overly detrimental to the game balance things, it just makes it a little more interesting for America in the Atlantic.
As for German’s losing planes:
1) They probably do not lose any around the British Isles anyway. Those attacks are pretty safe (except for the U-Boat commanders.)
2) If I can get 3 of them in the Adriatic Sea, awesome! It’s my best shot at them and I can trade British ships that will die anyway, for German planes that could really screw up the Sea Lion balance making it easier for Germany (and thus Germany loses less ground troops!)
3) I’m really hoping my AA Gun will shoot at least one German plane down during Sea Lion.
The name of the game is kill the Luftwaffe! The less planes Germany has, the stronger Russia’s position. The stronger Russia’s position, the more leeway the Allies have in getting Japan back into their little bottle. The more leeway the Allies have to get Japan bottled up, the more sure they can be of success.
Can Germany replace the planes lost? OF COURSE! Just keep in mind, 3 replacement fighters = 10 Infantry. In the case of SZ 97, to replace the 2 fighters and tactical bomber you lose 9 Infantry and 1 Artillery worth of IPC. What has England lost? The carrier, cruiser and destroyer that were not getting out anyway. (Unless you escape through the Suez, but then you leave Italy with a Battleship, Cruiser and 2 Transports and we really do not want to do that!)
If they lose another 1 or 2 over London, we’ve reduced the Germans from 4 Fighters, 5 Tactical Bombers, 1 Strategic Bomber to 2 Fighters, 2 Tactical Bombers, 1 Strategic Bomber.
That’s a loss of 2 Fighters, 3 Tactical Bombers or 52 IPC worth of equipment. Sure, I lost England. Yay, who cares. But maybe I also forced Germany to decide between taking England with a tank or retreating with a plane? eh. Not to mention, 5 Aircraft vs 3 Aircraft is more managable for Russia!