Regarding SZ 110, I got hosed one time on a UK scramble. Usually as Germany, I send 3 fighters, 3 Stukas, 1 bombers and sometimes 1 sub to SZ 110. Our UK player had gotten in the habit of not scrambling in order to save the RAF for future action.
Well, this one game I made the mistake of just assuming UK would not scramble. I sent 2 fighters, 2 Stukas and 1 bomber to SZ 110. The other fighter and Stuka I sent to kill the French fleet in SZ 93. Well, UK taught me a lesson. They scrambled and wiped out my planes. I didn’t even kill all the ships in the channel.
Never made that mistake again.
AAG40 FAQ
-
Are the alpha modifications for Global 100% done?
-
Hey Krieghund, thanks for the update on the rulebook. Speak of which - Larry has been a bit quiet recently… everything okay?
We’ve been very busy wrapping things up.
If I have a transport and want to move through a sz with an enemy sub on my way to do an amph. assault a couple sea zones away, in alpha 3 is this still possible?
My understanding is the sub no longer gets a dice roll at my tranny, and my tranny can’t amph assault in that same sea zone as the sub, but I assume my tranny can make an amph. assault in another sea zone after passing through the one with the sub?
Your understanding is correct.
@Young:
Are the alpha modifications for Global 100% done?
More like 99%.
-
More historically accurate turn orders:
Europe 1940:Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Soviet Union (Russia), United States
Pacific 1940: Japan, China, United Kingdom (British India), Australia, United States -
Germany
France
Soviet Union
Japan
China
United Kingdom
Italy
United States
ANZAC -
For online playability I would say best turn order:
Germany
Russia
Japan
America
China
Italy
England
India
ANZAC
France -
We need a rules clarification for a current game.
Germany ended their turn with a navy in sz114 (with destroyer present)
Russia ended their turn by moving the Baltic sub into sz114 in the non combat phase.The question is:
1. Was that a legal move?
2. On Germany’s next turn can they load transports in sz114 for an amphibious assault on Novgorod and also attack the sub in sz114 with the destroyer and planes?Thanks!
-
We need a rules clarification for a current game.
Germany ended their turn with a navy in sz114 (with destroyer present)
Russia ended their turn by moving the Baltic sub into sz114 in the non combat phase.The question is:
1. Was that a legal move?
2. On Germany’s next turn can they load transports in sz114 for an amphibious assault on Novgorod and also attack the sub in sz114 with the destroyer and planes?Thanks!
1. Yes. Subs are allowed to noncombat move into any seazone. They are also allowed to noncombat move thru a seazone with hostile units if no enemy destroyers are present.
2. Yes. Subs don’t block loading (or make a seazone hostile). And a hostile seazone is the only thing that blocks loading of units (not whether combat will occur).
-
I just printed this entire FAQ thread (638 pages), not quite sure what to do with it, but I’ll think of something.
-
@Young:
I just printed this entire FAQ thread (638 pages), not quite sure what to do with it, but I’ll think of something.
if youd be so kind as to give me a list of the most asked questions (you know the frequently asked questions or faq) I can weed this thread WAY down! That’s what you can do with it, if you are so inclined.
-
@Cmdr:
@Young:
I just printed this entire FAQ thread (638 pages), not quite sure what to do with it, but I’ll think of something.
if youd be so kind as to give me a list of the most asked questions (you know the frequently asked questions or faq) I can weed this thread WAY down! That’s what you can do with it, if you are so inclined.
Sure, I would also love to give you the reply numbers of every irrelevant post, however, to my disappointment, the print friendly features didn’t include reply numbers.
-
@Young:
@Cmdr:
@Young:
I just printed this entire FAQ thread (638 pages), not quite sure what to do with it, but I’ll think of something.
if youd be so kind as to give me a list of the most asked questions (you know the frequently asked questions or faq) I can weed this thread WAY down! That’s what you can do with it, if you are so inclined.
Sure, I would also love to give you the reply numbers of every irrelevant post, however, to my disappointment, the print friendly features didn’t include reply numbers.
Just the FAQs, man! Once I have a list of questions, I can find the answers and make a few posts of questions and answers - unsticky this one and sticky the new one in hopes to keep the page numbers down toooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo less than 100?
-
@Cmdr:
@Young:
@Cmdr:
@Young:
I just printed this entire FAQ thread (638 pages), not quite sure what to do with it, but I’ll think of something.
if youd be so kind as to give me a list of the most asked questions (you know the frequently asked questions or faq) I can weed this thread WAY down! That’s what you can do with it, if you are so inclined.
Sure, I would also love to give you the reply numbers of every irrelevant post, however, to my disappointment, the print friendly features didn’t include reply numbers.
Just the FAQs, man! Once I have a list of questions, I can find the answers and make a few posts of questions and answers - unsticky this one and sticky the new one in hopes to keep the page numbers down toooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo less than 100?
It will take me awhile so don’t expect anything for at least 3 months ( the stack of paper is over a foot high).
-
@Young:
@Cmdr:
@Young:
@Cmdr:
@Young:
I just printed this entire FAQ thread (638 pages), not quite sure what to do with it, but I’ll think of something.
if youd be so kind as to give me a list of the most asked questions (you know the frequently asked questions or faq) I can weed this thread WAY down! That’s what you can do with it, if you are so inclined.
Sure, I would also love to give you the reply numbers of every irrelevant post, however, to my disappointment, the print friendly features didn’t include reply numbers.
Just the FAQs, man! Once I have a list of questions, I can find the answers and make a few posts of questions and answers - unsticky this one and sticky the new one in hopes to keep the page numbers down toooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo less than 100?
It will take me awhile so don’t expect anything for at least 3 months ( the stack of paper is over a foot high).
You actually printed all 166 pages?
-
@Cmdr:
@Young:
@Cmdr:
@Young:
@Cmdr:
@Young:
I just printed this entire FAQ thread (638 pages), not quite sure what to do with it, but I’ll think of something.
if youd be so kind as to give me a list of the most asked questions (you know the frequently asked questions or faq) I can weed this thread WAY down! That’s what you can do with it, if you are so inclined.
Sure, I would also love to give you the reply numbers of every irrelevant post, however, to my disappointment, the print friendly features didn’t include reply numbers.
Just the FAQs, man! Once I have a list of questions, I can find the answers and make a few posts of questions and answers - unsticky this one and sticky the new one in hopes to keep the page numbers down toooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo less than 100?
It will take me awhile so don’t expect anything for at least 3 months ( the stack of paper is over a foot high).
You actually printed all 166 pages?
Yes, all 166 pages of the thread, which came out as 638 printed pages.
-
@Young:
@Cmdr:
@Young:
@Cmdr:
@Young:
@Cmdr:
@Young:
I just printed this entire FAQ thread (638 pages), not quite sure what to do with it, but I’ll think of something.
if youd be so kind as to give me a list of the most asked questions (you know the frequently asked questions or faq) I can weed this thread WAY down! That’s what you can do with it, if you are so inclined.
Sure, I would also love to give you the reply numbers of every irrelevant post, however, to my disappointment, the print friendly features didn’t include reply numbers.
Just the FAQs, man! Once I have a list of questions, I can find the answers and make a few posts of questions and answers - unsticky this one and sticky the new one in hopes to keep the page numbers down toooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo less than 100?
It will take me awhile so don’t expect anything for at least 3 months ( the stack of paper is over a foot high).
You actually printed all 166 pages?
Yes, all 166 pages of the thread, which came out as 638 printed pages.
WOW and I dont mean Warcraft!
-
Can aircraft from one power’s terr fly over a strict neutral without delcaring war on it/been claimed yet and land on a friendly terr during non-com?
-
Can aircraft from one power’s terr fly over a strict neutral without delcaring war on it/been claimed yet and land on a friendly terr during non-com?
Like for example: figs from india fly over afghan to reach moscow?
-
No.
-
When will the new Global Rulebook be published or available online?
-
Few Questions:
1. If i research Rockets, can i attack with two Airfields one IC? Rule: "Your air bases can now launch rockets. During the Strategic and Tactical Bombing Raid step of your Conduct Combat phase each turn, each of your operative air bases can make a single rocket attack against an enemy industrial complex, air base, or naval base within 4spaces of it. (…)
2. Situation: German ships in Sz 109. England dont attack them in GB2, but Germany want make Sealion in G3 and want to earn most money as they can. Question: Can the german player choose, if he want to make a Convoy disruption in GB2 or must he did the Convoy disruption, because his ships stand in Sz 109, which is an Convoy Seazone.
3. Situation: Germany stays in London. US attacks with an amphibius assault, but only want to take Cruisers and Battleships for shorebombardement plus the transports for the landing. But there are also Subs and Destroyers in the Seazone. The US Player want to move them in NCM away. Now the German Player decide to scramble. Question: Are the Subs and destroyers automaticly involved in the battle. Or in other words: Cant they move away in NCM, because they fight in Combat Phase? Can the subs move in NCM, because they cant hit the germans planes and the germans planes cant hit the subs without a destroyer?!