You misread
It’s at the 10 million mark in the 6th month
That is it only sold just just over 10 million in month #6
7 never dropped below 20
@Uncrustable:
You misread
It’s at the 10 million mark in the 6th month
That is it only sold just just over 10 million in month #6
7 never dropped below 20
No, you miswrote.
Win8 sales at 6 months is on par with Win7 sales at 6 months.
But I’ve already gone over how the market has changed, this is more a symptom of mobile computing and Apple domination in that category, which started before Win8 was ever released. However, both Win8 and Win7 have increasing market share while XP and Vista are declining.
Lets look at some numbers jermo,
The PC market has suffered its biggest decline on record, with first quarter shipments dropping 14% since the same time last year. This unprecedented decline casts a very ominous light on the PC industry, which had hoped that Windows 8 would bolster sales — but instead, Microsoft’s new OS is a major factor in the most precipitous decline in history.
These figures come from IDC, which has been tracking PC shipments since 1994. Shipments (not sales, which were probably lower) of PCs in the first quarter of 2013 totaled 76.3 million, down 13.9% from the first quarter of 2012. Gartner, which has a slightly different definition of “PC,” pegged the decline at 11%. Among the individual PC makers, every OEM except Lenovo experienced a decline in shipments. HP’s PC department, which has been flagging for some time, experienced a huge drop of 24% compared to the same time last year.
Vista, universally acknowledged as a failure, actually had significantly better adoption numbers than Windows 8. At similar points in their roll-outs, Vista had a desktop market share of 4.52% compared to Windows 8’s share of 2.67%
on the desktop, Windows 7 still ranks as the top operating system with 44.85-percent of all PC users, followed by the still popular Windows XP with 37.74-percent. Vista—yes the never-loved Vista—comes in at third with 4.51 percent. Despite the fact that finding and buying Windows 7 PCs has become increasingly more expensive and difficult, just try finding one in a retail store, Windows 8 share is growing but still comes in last at 4.27 percent.
Worse still, Windows 8’s month-over-month growth rate is lagging further and further behind Vista’s dreadful 2007 adoption numbers. When comparing the operating systems when they were first launched, Windows 8’s adoption rate in its first month trailed Vista by just over half-a-percent among PC buyers. Now, in their 8th month out, Vista’s market-share numbers now lead Windows 8 by 3.64 percent. Needless to say, both lag far behind XP and Windows 7’s numbers at similar points in their product life-cycle.
With the exception of the Xbox, Microsoft has been on a string of high-profile failures like Zune, Windows Phone, and Surface tablets. But its latest cock-up, the much-reviled Windows 8 operating system may have been the final straw for lots of Windows-based PC users, at least according to those who make the computers.
ZDnet’s Adrian Kingsley-Hughes writes today it’s been so bad that an upcoming Windows 8 update might actually be a U-turn to the interface that Windows users are accustomed to.
He also says that original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) have been hurt by the drastic switch to Windows 8.
Some manufacturers like Samsung and Lenovo have taken actions — such as adding a Start button replacement — that openly address complaints from consumers about Windows 8. While others, like the CEO of Asus, have been more open about their displeasure, publicly stating that “demand for Windows 8 is not that good right now.”
But there are those with even harsher views of Windows 8. Kingsley-Hughes writes that “Privately, one OEM source told me that Microsoft is ‘destroying’ the PC industry, while another claimed that Windows 8 has ‘handed over millions of customers to Apple.’”
This is a delicate time for Microsoft in the consumer world, as more people do their e-mailing and web-browsing from smartphones, tablets, or other connected devices that don’t use a Windows OS. Meanhile, both Google and Apple continue to dominate the mobile OS market — in addition to the hardware sold by both companies.
“Windows 8 has done little to boost sales,” writes Kingsley-Hughes, “so OEMs will be pinning their hopes on the next big thing to come out of Redmond.”
I prefer windows 9
@Imperious:
I prefer windows 9
If that is Windows 9, im sticking with 7 again.
I just bought the Alienware x51 with Win 8.
I have to say, Win 8 was confusing and pissed me off.
at first.
but now, I really like it. Switching from the tablet screen and the desktop is extremely easy.
Missing the start bar? put your mouse in the top right or bottom right of the screen. Bam, there you go. problem solved. Everything is consolidated where it makes sense to be.
I look at the different desktops as having their strengths and weaknesses. If I need to do file management, installations, etc… the old desktop is better.
If I want to quickly get to entertainment or personal things like videos/games/music/anything internet related, the Apps desktop is superior.
It took me all of an hour to become familiar with it to the point of confidently and quickly navigating anywhere on the OS.
I am what some would call “computer illiterate” and I have a healthy mistrust of technology. If I can do it, so can you.
Last weekend I needed a cheapy computer for something in a hurry so I ran out to Walmart and grabbed the standard $400 laptop, forgetting all about the Windows 8 rumours I’ve heard. Sure enough, the poor thing was infected with Windows 8 and I couldn;t make heads nor tails of it. So I took it back to the store and claimed the OS is unusable and therefore defective and the kid working there agreed with me and gave me a refund. :-D
Windows 8 is garbage. Macs are toys. These things are not really meant for people who actually use computers as tools to do their work and earn a living. If you want a tablet or a phone, then buy a tablet or a phone and go play with it. If you want a computer to do your work, then I guess you need to get a used one with windows 7 or XP, or be a complete tool and pay an extra $99 for Windows 7. What a bunch of sh!t. If they keep this up I’m going to Linux.
And another thing, Openoffice or Libreoffice is 110% better than microsoft office and its free.
Macs are not meant for people who work? Maybe if you do software development…… But windows 8 does suck. Macs have the highest user satisfaction rating of any computer. I of course use a PC…
I hate that microsoft keeps changing where to find things. Memories of using 6 other MS versions doesn’t help.
Agreed on Openoffice, I use it.
Windows sales are based on unit shipments. If you get a pc with windows 8 and downgrade it to win7 for your corporation standards, it still counts as a windows 8 sale even if the license is NEVER activated.
yes i believe anyone that purchases windows 8 can downgrade?
this is the only reason the sales show a decent number
but if you look at user% it is the worst windows ever…even vista blows it out of the water and that is just sad. xp and 7 are both used nearly 3x as much as 8
Windows sales are based on unit shipments. If you get a pc with windows 8 and downgrade it to win7 for your corporation standards, it still counts as a windows 8 sale even if the license is NEVER activated.
Oh brother. I wonder if anyone at microsoft is keeping track of how many people downgrade! I think as of the spring you had to buy the windows 7 disc to downgrade but they might have changed that since then. It should be free obviously.
I’m sure they keep track of it, they just will never publish it……
Last weekend I needed a cheapy computer for something in a hurry so I ran out to Walmart and grabbed the standard $400 laptop, forgetting all about the Windows 8 rumours I’ve heard. Sure enough, the poor thing was infected with Windows 8 and I couldn;t make heads nor tails of it. So I took it back to the store and claimed the OS is unusable and therefore defective and the kid working there agreed with me and gave me a refund. :-D
Windows 8 is garbage. Macs are toys. These things are not really meant for people who actually use computers as tools to do their work and earn a living. If you want a tablet or a phone, then buy a tablet or a phone and go play with it. If you want a computer to do your work, then I guess you need to get a used one with windows 7 or XP, or be a complete tool and pay an extra $99 for Windows 7. What a bunch of sh!t. If they keep this up I’m going to Linux.
And another thing, Openoffice or Libreoffice is 110% better than microsoft office and its free.
Use PowerShell. It’s awesome and true to its name, it’s very powerful.
I’m studying the MCSE 2012 for Server and Win8. There’s a lot features that kick ass but most people will never use them nor know about them. In a Core installation for Server, you can only use PowerShell - however you can do it from any computer.
Seriously, though, the “this OS sucks because I won’t take the time to learn it” is old. A tool is only as useful as the person wielding it.
@Uncrustable:
yes i believe anyone that purchases windows 8 can downgrade?
this is the only reason the sales show a decent numberbut if you look at user% it is the worst windows ever…even vista blows it out of the water and that is just sad. xp and 7 are both used nearly 3x as much as 8
Raw numbers, sure, but that’s not a fair comparison. I already went over this - Win8 is on an identical pace that 7 and XP went on for sales/usage.
Also, XP users have about 6 months to replace their 12 year old OS! XP is almost old enough to shave and drive itself…
Most people don’t because they don’t do anything than email, a few apps, and browse the internet. Their phone is more powerful than their PC. What’s the point of owning one if you can carry your computer around all day? The needs of most users they don’t need much.
Sorry jermofoot, but I have to disagree. Designers of any product, including software, have to make sure their product is not only powerful but usable in the minds of the users. That’s why they call it software design. Microsoft’s genuises completely ignored human factors when they misdesigned windows 8 and now no one wants it. That’s on them; not the users.
Sorry jermofoot, but I have to disagree. Designers of any product, including software, have to make sure their product is not only powerful but usable in the minds of the users. That’s why they call it software design. Microsoft’s genuises completely ignored human factors when they misdesigned windows 8 and now no one wants it. That’s on them; not the users.
Windows Fate.
Sorry jermofoot, but I have to disagree. Designers of any product, including software, have to make sure their product is not only powerful but usable in the minds of the users. That’s why they call it software design. Microsoft’s genuises completely ignored human factors when they misdesigned windows 8 and now no one wants it. That’s on them; not the users.
Ok….what are they?
It supports touch - your fingers.
It has a GUI.
Mouse and keyboard are supported.
Hell, you can voice control it if you wanted to (built-in)
Plenty of people use it, including me. I don’t follow the argument.
Where in Win8 is it preventing you from doing “real work”, whatever that is.
OK so no one is EVER going to sit at their desk and glom their sticky fingers all over their expensive touchscreen when a mouse has been the tool of choice for decades. Its just not what people want to do and we don’t care that microsoft wants us to. Voice activation sounds about as fun as talking to a voicemail robot. No dice.
Now, to get these “features” we have to sacrifice all the basic, simple things that people have been taught to use ever since windows 95. The point of using a computer is not the OS; it’s the word processor, the spreadsheet, the internet browser, and in some cases the weird programming or scientific/engineering applications that some of us call work. If the OS gets in the way of getting that work done we don’t want it. The OS should be like makeup on a pretty girl - you shouldn’t even notice its there if its doing its job right.
Windows HATE gets a fail.
Jermofoot, corporate people who use windows for productivity are the ones complaining about windows 8. Pick up a non-microsoft sponsored trade journal on IT and read what users are saying, they hate it.
Corporations don’t like upgrading operating systems because it often breaks older software that works just fine. There is a reason why lots of companies still use older versions of an OS besides just being lazy.
You think windows 8 is all that, try reading some articles on it from people not on the microsoft payroll…
This site is a bit whacked but I recommend it for IT and strangish science news…
variance hit the nail on the head. People don’t want to relearn the applications they have been using for years just to do the same job. I started in IT BEFORE windows… I was a power user of windows 3.11, and have to write software for microsoft operating systems using microsoft programming tools. Trust me, change is not a welcome thing when it is forced on you.
OK so no one is EVER going to sit at their desk and glom their sticky fingers all over their expensive touchscreen when a mouse has been the tool of choice for decades. Its just not what people want to do and we don’t care that microsoft wants us to. Voice activation sounds about as fun as talking to a voicemail robot. No dice.
Now, to get these “features” we have to sacrifice all the basic, simple things that people have been taught to use ever since windows 95. The point of using a computer is not the OS; it’s the word processor, the spreadsheet, the internet browser, and in some cases the weird programming or scientific/engineering applications that some of us call work. If the OS gets in the way of getting that work done we don’t want it. The OS should be like makeup on a pretty girl - you shouldn’t even notice its there if its doing its job right.
Windows HATE gets a fail.
You still aren’t giving specifics. I just helped a client to map a drive and they were using Windows 8. If I knew the windows powershell command off the top of my head, it would have been done in seconds. Instead, it took about a minute, and most of that was identifying the path of the network share.
The lack of a Start button did not prevent my ability to get it done, nor delay the resolution noticeably, if at all.
Voice dictation has come a long way and works pretty smoothly. Not what I remember back in the 90s, which was pretty hilarious in the unintentional results that came up.
I’m not what “features we have to sacrifice” to use a mouse. It’s there. The keyboard - also there. There is realistically no functional difference between operating the way you would in Win95 in Win8. I’ve done it dozens of times at this point. I still don’t see where the “OS is getting in the way”. If I can do it jumping in blindly, and a self-described “computer illiterate” user can do it in an hour, I don’t believe there is an issue here except that people want to make it one.
So tell me again….where is the issue? You say you have an issue with the OS getting in the way of reaching say, a Word Processor. I can give you probably a dozen ways to reach it. How in the world do you blame the OS when the User can’t find his way around when there are literally more ways to reach it than ever before, including how it was accessed previously???
Jermofoot, corporate people who use windows for productivity are the ones complaining about windows 8. Pick up a non-microsoft sponsored trade journal on IT and read what users are saying, they hate it.
Corporations don’t like upgrading operating systems because it often breaks older software that works just fine. There is a reason why lots of companies still use older versions of an OS besides just being lazy.
You think windows 8 is all that, try reading some articles on it from people not on the microsoft payroll…
This site is a bit whacked but I recommend it for IT and strangish science news…
variance hit the nail on the head. People don’t want to relearn the applications they have been using for years just to do the same job. I started in IT BEFORE windows… I was a power user of windows 3.11, and have to write software for microsoft operating systems using microsoft programming tools. Trust me, change is not a welcome thing when it is forced on you.
You are right and that is a valid point. However, that is not relegated to Win8 alone: all previously releases of Win O/S had the same compatibility issue with programs designed for the preceding release. There are some compatibility approaches to this: run in different modes on the current O/S, install a virtual O/S, but nothing is perfect. Additionally, the number 1 factor in upgrading isn’t user experience or compatibility, it’s BUDGET, guaranteed.
As far as not updating - same thing, many people are on XP and never moved to Vista or 7. The majority of our clients are this way, and are honestly waiting way too long to implement and upgrade to a newer O/S. There is a very real security issue here. Software changes (and should) just as well…yet where are the complaints? I feel it’s unfairly directed at MS because people are lazy, impatient, and think everything should just automatically work. Expectations are completely wrong. But that’s beside the point.
I need specifics on why people claim it’s so terrible. Saying it does not make it so, and so far the few complaints I’ve run into all come down to a user doesn’t take the time to familiarize themselves. AN HOUR. Anyone that purchases any utility, electronic, tool, vehicle, etc. and does not spend at least a cursory amount of time reading a manual or orienting themselves are just being irresponsible.
I will give MS is due criticism, however I don’t think it’s here.
Windows 95 was better than 3.11 and xp was better still, so people adopted them and many are still perfectly happy with xp or 7. The only thing that makes xp “obsolete” is microsoft decided to not support it anymore just so they can ram this windows 8 garbage down our throats (and don’t give me any crap about security issues because it should be microsoft’s job to release any necessary patches to support the product they sold us). If windows 8 was an improvement over xp or 7 they wouldn’t have to force it; people would see the advantages and adopt it but that’s not what’s happening because windows 8 just plain sucks.
Here are some specifics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9Qo_2I0NvQ&feature=share
