Axis & Allies Dunkirk

[SuperbattleshipYamato]

@FranceNeedsMorePower

Well, you didn’t say you used AI anywhere. Otherwise, most people would assume that it was entirely written by a human. If you edited and wrote some of it yourself, you can obviously credit yourself as such.

I didn’t get the impression that you would be using the D-Day map. Maybe one similar to it, but not the same.

[FranceNeedsMorePower]

@SuperbattleshipYamato Sorry for all the confusion, ok so then I would get some credit. I just use AI to touch it up and add more ideas for example it came up with the idea that German ship can attack the evacuation fleet. I think everything is clear now right? It be a map like D-Day I said this at this spot “A detailed map of the Dunkirk region, including the beach area, town of Dunkirk, and surrounding countryside.” This would be similar to the D-Day map. So would I need to tag this as AI or no?

[SuperbattleshipYamato]

@FranceNeedsMorePower

Well, a disclaimer would be nice. Since it’s not too clear how to tag it, I suggest you just explain this above. The part about Germans ships attacking the fleet definitely felt like one of the most “AI-ish” parts to me.

[Panther]

@FranceNeedsMorePower said in Axis & Allies Dunkirk:

@Panther How would I tag it?

Thank you for your confirmation. To be clear: All of this discussion is not about blaming you for having used AI in any way.

It is just the first time the use of AI (to which extent ever) has become obvious to a user (@SuperbattleshipYamato ) - and this is a new occurence on this forum.

Now the question has been “How to deal with it?” - and I have added a new related paragraph to our Forum Rules. See #14.

You add tags in your very first posting. There is a respective entry line at the bottom of the text.
Once you posted you can use “Edit” to add tags and disclaimer.
To save us some time I have already added a tag.

[FranceNeedsMorePower]

@SuperbattleshipYamato Welp looks like were good now. I’m going to start on a 1944 setup. Should I do early or late.

[Cernel]

@Witt said in Axis & Allies Dunkirk:

Blimey! Madness.
I thought it was a very long post and must have taken a lot of time amd effort . Perhaps , alarm bells should have rung.

As Panther has asked , Please confirm if this is the case @FranceNeedsMorePower

I am very worried about AI taking over the world, so would be good to know and have a policy or a little chat about it , if this post is not a human’s work.

In the delightful brightness of the far future, there is only AI.

About the near future instead, I’m guessing that virtually all board-games will be made by AI or at least mostly by it. The editors will just tell the AI the general concept of the game and the main game dynamics, and the AI will fill up the rest, creating the board-game itself and writing the rule-book.

And of course we will have the AI answering all our questions within 1 second in forum and elsewhere.

Maybe the new Axis&Allies we’ll be playing 20 years from now will be made by AI.

I’m curious about what AI experts like @redrum think about it though. Am I being too optimistic?

[Witt]

@FranceNeedsMorePower May 44. Before D-Day and Bagration. Not sure what happened in thr Pacific in the Summer of 44.

[SuperbattleshipYamato]

@Witt

Agreed.

Summer of 1944 was when the Battle of the Phillipine Sea happened, destroying Japan remaining carrier force. Also Marianas Islands campaign (Saipan+Guam). Probably the last chance the Axis would’ve squeaked by in some way.

[Witt]

@SuperbattleshipYamato thanks . I was sure 44 was the year of Japan’s collapse .
Was remarkable it had held so much territory for so long.
I suppose the US needed the time to build the war winning materiel and steam from island to island .

[SuperbattleshipYamato]

@Witt

Yeah. after 1943 the US advance was more slowed down by logistical considerations rather than Japanese resistance.