To be clear, any type of unit can hit any other type of unit unless the rules specifically state they can’t.
The new set-up
-
This is the new set-up
It looks like Russia start with a battleship, and Japan start the game controlling Australia
-
That setup was created by chimps. Only a chimp would stick an American in Poland or not bother to think in the utility is actually spending 10 minutes to set the game properly for a photo that will last 10 more years. This is how chimps work and think when they fall out of their tree.
-
Setup AA42= Setup Revised
Only difference:
Sea zone 10 Usa Cruiser instead CT
Sea Zone 30 Jap Cruiser instead CT
Sea Zone 35 UK Cruiser instead CT
Sea Zone 13 UK Cruiser instead Battleship -
what is CT ?
-
CT means DD.
Thi means that (considering new cost of units equals to the Anniversary cost): UK has 1 less BB(20 IPC) and 1 less DD (8 IPC) while has 2 CA(24 IPC), receiving then 4 less IPC in ships. USA has a CA(12) instead of a DD(8) gaining four IPC and Japana has a CA (12) instead of a DD, gainig also 4 IPC.
So IPC-wise the Allies have 4 less IPC in the setup, maybe a way to balance the game without requiring bid?
-
This cannot be the setup. Even a chimp would not start the game with China, Australia and India in jap’s hands
It can be a joke or a photoshop work, of course :-D
-
And no chimp would put a U.K. battleship of the coast of South Africa.
-
This immage of board is not the setup
the setup is
Setup AA42= Setup RevisedOnly difference:
Sea zone 10 Usa Cruiser instead DD
Sea Zone 30 Jap Cruiser instead DD
Sea Zone 35 UK Cruiser instead DD
Sea Zone 13 UK Cruiser instead Battleship -
C’mon guys. Is there ANY A&A game that has the board set up on the back? I’m sure they all have some mythical mid-game scenario set up. In which the Japanese have China, Australia and Hawaii, leaving the Russians secure enough to buy a battleship and the british hurrying to save South Africa.
-
C’mon guys. Is there ANY A&A game that has the board set up on the back?
Exactly! That is not the set up. USA didn’t have infantry in Poland.
-
@Imperious:
USA didn’t have infantry in Poland.
Shhh, don’t tell anyone but that’s Otto Skorzeny. :wink:
-
He must be plotting his Odessa organization to help his fellow comrades after the war.
-
@Imperious:
He must be plotting his Odessa organization to help his fellow comrades after the war.
Three tanks: 15 IPCs
One bomber: 12 IPCs
A ratline to get you to Argentina: Priceless
Suggested Topics
