So I attempted my own stylized take on the AA50 set up cards and National Objectives as I find myself squinting quite a bit on the provided ones. Two per 8.5"x11" letter which would print out nicely on card stock. I think I got the counts right, but let me know if anyone catches any typos! Enjoy!
AA50 re release
-
@TG:
Anybody can post anywhere. I just question the rationale of someone who’s played A&A:50 (on Triple A no less); determined it was not worth the price of admission yet continues to troll the A&A:50 board. You’re right. A&A:50 is not worth $100. It’s worth far more than that. That is a statement the majority of visitors in this board will agree with.
Once I played A&A:50, there was really no going back to revised for me.
For “the record,” I stated my friend owns a physical copy of the game. Second, as this topic has nothing to do with AA50 but instead a new title in the series, I don’t think it’s fair to consider this “trolling the AA50” board, as this isn’t the rightful place for this topic anyway.
The majority is not always right :wink: Tell me how many games have you played outside of the Axis and Allies series?
I will agree that their time would have been better spent on an Axis and Allies Europe Revised game, but, the time spent on this new one is unknown… could have taken a few days to draw up for all we know. Plus, I don’t think the Axis and Allies game system is well suited for a Europe conflict game (unless they go the Bulge/Guadalcanal “All New Mechanics” route) as I fail to see how it would possibly become anything but a tank rush to moscow. Of course, I would be very happy for Larry to prove me wrong! I think developing a better version of Pacific would be better than making a new Europe, as I think it has more potential… new naval combat rules like Guadalcanal would be great, for example.
-
It’s pretty weird. But I could make a try and playing it (on-line of course) if China is finally well done. I could try even if China is semi-decent done, or any state of better done than in AA50 :-P
It’s totally ilogical release this. I would be better testing AA50 more time (mainly Asian battlefield) and make it better balanced and less buggy then having 2 games, one unbalanced yet played and other that will not be played or buyed by many :|
Oh please, you know most people here will buy anything with the Axis and Allies branding, including the 42 edition :wink: lol
I do agree about China, the 1941 scenario was a major appeal to me but China is just horribly implemented there… :|
-
Im always excited to see another AAA out there, but I agree that AAE needs a revision and they should have just printed more copies of AA50.
-
Im always excited to see another AAA out there, but I agree that AAE needs a revision and they should have just printed more copies of AA50.
I totally agree. They should print a new version of A&A Europe with the cruiser units and the rules from A&A 50 Anniversary, and an Italian player. That would fix the issues with the present game, wich many claim to be broken.
But I do belive that the reason WOTC release a global game first, is the fact that more people are playing Revised than Europe. And there are no doubt whatsoever that the Anniversary rules are far superior to the Revised rules, so the Revised need to be revised again.
Now since Greg Leeds is the new boss in WOTC, and since he is a real bussines-man he will try harder to make money even if we are in the middle of a depression, he will give us a new A&A game every 4 month. In august we get A&A 1942. In january 2010 we get A&A Europe revised, and in august 2010 we get A&A Stalingrad, and in january 2011 we get A&A North Africa, and in august 2011 we get A&A the Great War 1914-1918. This is what both I and IL belive in. This is our religion.
-
yes this is religion. We believe in this!
-
For “the record,” I stated my friend owns a physical copy of the game. Second, as this topic has nothing to do with AA50 but instead a new title in the series, I don’t think it’s fair to consider this “trolling the AA50” board, as this isn’t the rightful place for this topic anyway.
You stated AA:50 is worth neither your money nor your time. Yet you still follow this board. That by definition is trolling. The fact that this thread does not belong in this board is irrelevant.
–—
Im always excited to see another AAA out there, but I agree that AAE needs a revision and they should have just printed more copies of AA50.
I would have liked it if they did print more copies of AA50. I have a few friends who want to play A&A:50, ever since I introduced it to them, yet can’t purchase their own copies now. It really hurts small, after-market companies like Field Marshall Games who are relying on a large installation base.
––
Now since Greg Leeds is the new boss in WOTC, and since he is a real bussines-man he will try harder to make money even if we are in the middle of a depression, he will give us a new A&A game every 4 month. In august we get A&A 1942. In january 2010 we get A&A Europe revised, and in august 2010 we get A&A Stalingrad, and in january 2011 we get A&A North Africa, and in august 2011 we get A&A the Great War 1914-1918. This is what both I and IL belive in. This is our religion.
Overkill. I fear you might be right.
-
@TG:
For “the record,” I stated my friend owns a physical copy of the game. Second, as this topic has nothing to do with AA50 but instead a new title in the series, I don’t think it’s fair to consider this “trolling the AA50” board, as this isn’t the rightful place for this topic anyway.
You stated AA:50 is worth neither your money nor your time. Yet you still follow this board. That by definition is trolling. The fact that this thread does not belong in this board is irrelevant.
Where did I say it is not worth my time? Being not worth my money, yes, but time, no. I’d be happy to play any Axis and Allies title, except maybe D-Day, as every game plays exactly the same, except for the die rolls. So if I did say it was not worth my time (which I don’t believe I did), that was an error on my part.
Also here is the definition of trolling, for you:
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response[1] or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.[2]
UNFORTUNATELY, I did provoke an “emotional response” but that was hardly my intent.
Simply lurking a forum for something I do not own to read up on discussion is not, by definition, trolling. Nor is posting an on-topic reply on a thread that happens to be, in itself, off-topic.
Now, look, I understand you are somehow upset that I prefer to spend my money in a different way than you do, but I would really prefer if we could stop this bickering and get the thread back on topic. :-D
Im always excited to see another AAA out there, but I agree that AAE needs a revision and they should have just printed more copies of AA50.
I totally agree. They should print a new version of A&A Europe with the cruiser units and the rules from A&A 50 Anniversary, and an Italian player. That would fix the issues with the present game, wich many claim to be broken.
But I do belive that the reason WOTC release a global game first, is the fact that more people are playing Revised than Europe. And there are no doubt whatsoever that the Anniversary rules are far superior to the Revised rules, so the Revised need to be revised again.
Now since Greg Leeds is the new boss in WOTC, and since he is a real bussines-man he will try harder to make money even if we are in the middle of a depression, he will give us a new A&A game every 4 month. In august we get A&A 1942. In january 2010 we get A&A Europe revised, and in august 2010 we get A&A Stalingrad, and in january 2011 we get A&A North Africa, and in august 2011 we get A&A the Great War 1914-1918. This is what both I and IL belive in. This is our religion.
But, what about a revised Pacific??? Do you think such a game will never exist? :? That would benefit far more from the new sea rules than Europe would. I’m not sure I follow why revised Europe is in so much more demand than Pacific. I mean, Europe is completely broken as the strategy every n00b would want to try first as Germany (LOL TANKS) is practically unbeatable, but the Japan India Crush in Pacific is equally ridiculous IMO. Of course, the difference would be that Japan has alternative paths to victory in Pacific, while Germany either tank rushes or dies.
If they could make a Europe where tank rush wasn’t broken, I would be very impressed though. Would be quite a game… I just can’t imagine how it’s possible.
-
You stated AA:50 is worth neither your money nor your time. Yet you still follow this board. That by definition is trolling. The fact that this thread does not belong in this board is irrelevant.
lets not go down this road please…
-
2004 Revised is out of print and since AH made lots of these and still sold out, they decided to make another version (think risk) and will update it to make the investment worth while. So expect to find a perfectly written rules and balanced game and no need for house rules. Expect quality pieces even greater than AA50. Expect a new map but having the same configuration as revised. Expect a few more things as well.
-
@Imperious:
2004 Revised is out of print and since AH made lots of these and still sold out, they decided to make another version (think risk) and will update it to make the investment worth while. So expect to find a perfectly written rules and balanced game and no need for house rules. Expect quality pieces even greater than AA50. Expect a new map but having the same configuration as revised. Expect a few more things as well.
No! Don’t make me expect all of those things! My wallet is already feeling the (slight) pain! :-D
-
its preorder at like $25 bucks. you can get it. just dont wait too long
-
Maybe this is an expansion… I dont know… It doesnt make sense to release another version of global AA 5 years after AA Revised…!
well they gotta keep up with the times
more has happened in the board game industry and community since revised was released, than in the 2 decades between revised and classic
-
some people don’t understand sarcasm over the internet.
-
@TG:
some people don’t understand sarcasm over the internet.
I dont think this was sarcasm. I know IL from long time ago, and he has forecastet stuff like this before, and always spot on. I guess he got some inside info. He might actually be one of the top playtesters. After reading his last post, I will now expect a few things from the chimps at WOTC. And I am darn serious about that.
-
@TG:
some people don’t understand sarcasm over the internet.
I dont think this was sarcasm. I know IL from long time ago, and he has forecastet stuff like this before, and always spot on. I guess he got some inside info. He might actually be one of the top playtesters. After reading his last post, I will now expect a few things from the chimps at WOTC. And I am darn serious about that.
I doubt IL was a playtester, as he’s been trying to ask Larry what the “deal” was with this new title… just a thought :wink:
Of course he could have inside info by now, who knows.
-
I can tell you i have nothing to do with this new game. But i do indeed already know everything. I told FMG to hold off on making pieces to the extent of which they may be inclined because i would feel really bad when a few months time we could have two sets of pieces.
I told FMG thats its best at this time to get the dice out and work on some secret projects not yet known.
And Craig i will PM you.
WOTC are the biggest chimps in the world. The most lazy good for nothing employees who ever lived. They hate AA and so i hate them 10 times worse.
Please buy this game up even if its not limited edition. This game will put the final nails in the coffin for 2004 revised. Its basically a fixed version where nobody can complain anymore about anything. Thank god that we are getting new pieces at last.
-
Any idea when we can see a picture of the new map?
-
Yes. put on ninja suit and fly to Boston and get in larry’s house and take lots of pictures.
-
@Imperious:
I can tell you i have nothing to do with this new game. But i do indeed already know everything. I told FMG to hold off on making pieces to the extent of which they may be inclined because i would feel really bad when a few months time we could have two sets of pieces.
I told FMG thats its best at this time to get the dice out and work on some secret projects not yet known.
And Craig i will PM you.
WOTC are the biggest chimps in the world. The most lazy good for nothing employees who ever lived. They hate AA and so i hate them 10 times worse.
Please buy this game up even if its not limited edition. This game will put the final nails in the coffin for 2004 revised. Its basically a fixed version where nobody can complain anymore about anything. Thank god that we are getting new pieces at last.
Wait, do you really know everything about it? I can’t tell if this one is sarcasm :-P
So we should expect good things from it? Basically Revised, but fixed?
-
So what are the differences from Revised to AA42? All the AA50 rules (minus Italy) implemented into the new game?