Education today vs. Yesteryears

I cannot say definitively when it comes to collegic graduates, however, if we extrapolate from high schoolers, I feel comfortable saying they are much less educated today and they rely too heavily on technology - at least in the mathematics and sciences areas.

Reason is, since about the 1970s our knowledge facilitators (teachers) have been indoctrinating knowledge seekers (students) with only that knowledge they need to pass the ACT, SAT and now the NCLB exams.

From the 1950s and 1960s knowledge facilitators were inflating academic scores in an attempt to prevent knowledge seekers from being drafted.

Therefore, it is my assertion that since the end of the second World War, possibly as late as the start of the Korean conflict (aka: War) the educational arena has become more political and less knowledge based.

For me, this is very disheartening.  I would wish that knowledge seekers get the grade they earn and only progress when they have demonstrated to the knowledge facilitator an adequate command of the subject material.  This could be demonstrated through examinations, homework, in class participation or one on one assistance in office hours (most likely a combination of the above) instead of on age and a standardized examination.

This is not to say I dislike accountability, only that I wish for knowledge seekers to be more concerned with understanding and less concerned with what score they received on their standardized examination.  Likewise, knowledge facilitators should be less concerned about the political realm and more concerned with how well their seekers are performing in all aspects of their studies, and not only on what the exam scores tell them.

I’m not sure we can qualify the assertion that generations past were better educated than the current generation.

I think one thing that is conflated here is that old people always call youngins stupid, no matter the generation.  Why?  Because kids are dumb for the most part.  They are inexperienced, immature, etc., so they don’t have the lens of living like old timers do.  That’s just the way it is.

Obviously, the amount and accessibility of information is greater than past years.  The number of college attendees not only has increased but has broadened with the inclusion of women and nonwhite races.  How seriously one takes it is up to the individual, but the opportunity and quality of education is better now than it was before.

The problems I see with education today is that it isn’t taken as seriously, from the students to the administration & legislatures.  Kids get trust funds and don’t give a crap about learning because they know they are taken care of, some people have to devote most of their time to working and family so higher education isn’t an option, etc.

I don’t think technology is a bad thing in the regards of education.  Knowing where to find information is an educational tool and core element to learning - it’s a key ability needed.

As a draftsman one of the things you see is kids out of school who know how to use computer aided drafting programs but not the first thing about making a drawing a machinist needs to make a part.

I learned how to make drawings and then how to use CAD so I could make drawings faster.

There is a too much emphasis on teaching the use of tools and not enough on the concepts behind them. The spellchecker won’t catch ‘pubic area’ when you meant ‘public area.’ Sometimes you have to do things for yourself.  I’m not really sure I’m better off with the calculator than I was with the slide rule.

Jermo makes a good point about not being able to qualify, or did you mean quantify, the education now with the education of the past.

@frimmel:

Jermo makes a good point about not being able to qualify, or did you mean quantify, the education now with the education of the past.

:lol:  Probably.  My mind is not up to par these days…

I only caught it because I’d just been talking about a similar sort of misstep.  :-)

Well, first I’d like to say I sure wish I had more Frimmels to work with.  I’m an engineer.  I learned how to compute the old fashioned way with pencil and paper.  Yes I did have the use of an electronic calculator but that only made the arithmatic go faster.  Most engineers I meet from school don’t know how to compute their answers for anything harder than a “look up” by hand.  They get wrong answers from the computer because the program has a bug and they don’t know enough to figure it out.  If you take away the Internet, they would hardly be able to give you an answer to anything except which music thingy has the most storage.  They walk around with their buds in their ears and texting their friends.  I fear for when they have children.  Not all of them.  I meet 1 in 20 that are worth something, but maybe that is because I graduated well and I have high expectations.

I don’t know as much as my dad.  I’m getting closer, but I’m not there yet.  But the things I know are more “bookish” than what he knows.  My son appears to be keeping the trend toward “bookishness” but I am making sure he knows a lot of stuff, and I hope to help him surpass me by quite a margin.

But by and large, we don’t expect much of the kids these days and they are living up to it.  Kids before WWII had to be adults by the time they were 14 or 15 helping out with the family in a substantial way.

Shoot, in the 19th century we had one of the best education systems in the world.  Foreigners would come to small American towns and marvel at 16 year old children speaking Latin.

@dinosaur:

Well, first I’d like to say I sure wish I had more Frimmels to work with.

Thanks, but don’t give me too much credit. I’m mostly a librarian. I hardly ever make drawings these days mostly I just make the electornic stuff we get in ready for others to use. Maybe that is just our field though. Steel is on hard times.

But by and large, we don’t expect much of the kids these days and they are living up to it.  Kids before WWII had to be adults by the time they were 14 or 15 helping out with the family in a substantial way.

I certainly agree with you there. But in a way though that is a useful indicator that you are an adult: You don’t like kids’ music, you don’t like their clothes and you don’t like their attitude.

@LT04:

@General:

Shoot, in the 19th century we had one of the best education systems in the world.  Foreigners would come to small American towns and marvel at 16 year old children speaking Latin.

Well we have failed to keep that legacy going.

It was when school stopped being about being ‘educated’ and instead became about being trained to be useful to business. Colleges are now just really expensive trade schools.

What did the college graduate say at McDonald’s?

Do you want fries with that?

Here’s one for you.

School Policy District U-46 (Where I work):

Teachers are not to teach division.  Teachers may refer students to NCLB (No Child Left Behind) video #HH-5519 if the student is having problems with division problems.

The video teaches you to use your fingers and to draw objects on a page.  It’s a completely worthless piece of junk and it’s 18 minutes long.  Why can’t we just teach fractions and long division like teachers did before the Clinton then Bush administrations?

Lets leave out Bush and Clinton from future posts please.

@Imperious:

Lets leave out Bush and Clinton from future posts please.

Sorry, but at least they are from opposing parties, so we can’t blame one party or the other for this sh*t.  That’s what I was driving at.  One just expanded the inept program of the other, meaning both were completely inept!

When will they learn to let teachers write the teaching codes?

@Cmdr:

Here’s one for you.

School Policy District U-46 (Where I work):

Teachers are not to teach division.  Teachers may refer students to NCLB (No Child Left Behind) video #HH-5519 if the student is having problems with division problems.

:-o

:?

:|

:lol:

Good one you had me going for a minute there.

I can’t tell you how much stuff like that burns me up.  Kids should be required to learn long division in or before 4th grade.  My son is being told by the teacher that is what calculators are for.  I don’t think a kid should use a calculator until they are doing trig problems.  If our kkids can’t do the math, they will never learn to budget.  But how many times do you hear about thirty year olds still living at home?  It is all part of the same problem.

@dinosaur:

I can’t tell you how much stuff like that burns me up.  Kids should be required to learn long division in or before 4th grade.  My son is being told by the teacher that is what calculators are for.  I don’t think a kid should use a calculator until they are doing trig problems.  If our kkids can’t do the math, they will never learn to budget.  But how many times do you hear about thirty year olds still living at home?  It is all part of the same problem.

Exactly!  And they are required to have the calculator for the standardized test!

None of my kids knew what the dots above and below the line on the division symbol meant before I told them yesterday (Tuesday the 14th of October 2008)!

But we’re told they don’t need to learn math.  The cash registers will tell them how much change to dole out and Quick Books will tell them how much money they have in their banks!