I’m only asking the follow up questions because it was too late to change Germany 1 and my opponent did NOT build fleet in SZ 6, he left it empty. He decided to set up a KJF instead, taking Borneo and New Guinea and spreading the British Pacific fleet from Solomons to New Guinea to the Sea near Kwangtung and Borneo. (SZ’s 45, 47, 48, and 59)
As Japan I decided to go navy myself, taking china, because I could, and destroying the British fleet with no losses to my own units. I’m sitting there with 3 carriers, 2 destroyers, 2 transports, 6 fighters, 1 bomber and 2 battleships staring at the American fleet of BB, DD, TRN, AC, 2 Fig, 1 SS (Pacific side.)
I’m assuming he’s going to move his Destroyer to SZ 12 to block the Med fleet. In which case, I plan to sink his destroyer and unify my fleet in SZ 7 giving Germany 2 Fighters, 5 Transports, 3 Submarines, 1 Destroyer and 1 Battleship. Pretty formidable on defense and it forces the allies to defend against future Sea Lion attempts.
I’m also going to assume he moves 2 fighters and 2 transports up to SZ 8 giving his fleet, 2 US Fighters, 4 Transports (2 US, 2 UK), 1 Submarine (Rus), 1 BB (UK) and 1 AC (UK.) That’s enough to stop my BB, SS, TRN, 5 Fgt and Bmb according to frood. And if he lands 2 Inf, 1 art, 1 arm on England he should be able to stop Sea Lion this round.
Though, he got hit hard in Ukraine and in W. Russia. Russia was reduced from 130 IPC in units to 98 IPCs in units after Round 1 (including his builds) and down to 93 IPC in units after Germany 1. (Hey, I couldnt let a solitary tank sit in Ukraine, right?)
Anyway, I’m in a good position to hit him anyway he goes, but I was curious as to the merits of hitting N. America with nuissance strikes iwth Japan if he decides to flee the Pacific? It could buy Germany some time.
I was also curious as to the merits of abandoning Africa with Germany (since Africa has 1 German Inf, 1 German Art and 1 British Inf currently) and leaving it to Japan, in which case an IC in E. Indies might be advisable.