TUV Differential / Net TUV - Round 1
G1
Eastern Front: +7.23 / +30
Atlantic/WA: +3.93 / +60
Total: +11.16 / +90
Allied1
Eastern Front: +3.00 / +14
Atlantic/WA: +4.39 / +48
Total: +7.39 / +62
geez…
att:
Rolls: 3@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 13@1: (6, 3, 1)1@3: (4)1@4: (6)
def:
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (1, 4)
att:
Rolls: 2@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 02@1: (3, 5)1@3: (4)1@4: (5)
def:
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
WTF!
att:
Rolls: 1@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@1: (5)1@3: (6)1@4: (2)
def:
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
Ger08
collect: 59ipc’s
NO’s:
10ipc’s
total: 69ipc’s
one placement change: 2inf and 2mech switch places between WGer and Berlin
I don’t think I like this dicey.
Germany should have an extra 5 IPC for controlling Cau (No #3).
yay!
thanks. got a little bit angry over the vologda debacle. finished turn rather hastily.
I’ve got my avatar but the website won’t let me use it. I suppose photos are to complex or something.
quick german ncm change. map coming….
How does Anzac take Solomon when the dice showed Japan getting 2 hits to one, even though you really shouldn’t to the death dice unless it’s 1 against 1.
20@1: (3, 6, 6, 1, 3, 3, 2, 6, 1, 6, 1, 4, 6, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 1)
20@2: (1, 4, 6, 1, 5, 2, 4, 2, 3, 3, 1, 6, 3, 6, 1, 6, 3, 2, 5, 3)
Shouldn’t Solomon be empty but still under Japanese control?
I had to look at it close to count it but its correct. The way he rolled it may not be not forum-correct but I’m ok with it.
on the other hand I have a BIG problem with how well his inf have rolled on the defense vs me. :x
I had to look at it close to count it but its correct. The way he rolled it may not be not forum-correct but I’m ok with it.
on the other hand I have a BIG problem with how well his inf have rolled on the defense vs me. :x
You will have to elaborate, cause i’m not ok with it.
rnd 1 att:miss miss def:hit
rnd 2 att:miss def:miss
rnd 3 att:hit def:miss
rnd 4 att:miss def:hit but rnd 4 doesn’t happen because our inf is dead.
again, it may not be the the official way to roll it but this ain’t no tournament.
Yes, what I was going to say, but my connection crapped out before I could.
R8
IPC=19
Purchases: 5 inf, 1 rtl
Combat
kaz
1 inf sam
vol
2 inf tam
2 ftr, 1 tac rus
kaz lwol.
vol
A: 2 inf, 2 ftr, 1 tac
Rolls: 2@1 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 22@1: (6, 6)2@3: (4, 2)1@4: (1)
D: 1 inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)
Sorry EM, I probably should have gone round by round, but I didn’t want to go through typing the same thing out a bunch of times. I wasn’t aware I was breaking forum etiquette, so I’ll go the carpal tunnel route next time. As for the explanation, M7574 had it right.
vol lwol.
NCM
see map.
Place
5 inf, 1 rtl rus
Collects
21
BTW, French moves: 3 inf alex > egy; 1 inf cng > sud
Another suggestion is to roll the 2 inf separately, in future similar situations. For example, in that battle round 1 would look like:
Attacker: 2 inf
:bbb 10@1 10@1:
Defender: 1 inf
:bbb 10@2:
Then you can clearly see which inf hits first.
rnd 1 att:miss miss def:hit
rnd 2 att:miss def:miss
rnd 3 att:hit def:miss
rnd 4 att:miss def:hit but rnd 4 doesn’t happen because our inf is dead.again, it may not be the the official way to roll it but this ain’t no tournament.
We both agree that rd1 was a miss on both parts as it was rolled properly.
Next roll was 20 against 20, this is a too the death roll, first hits win. Technically you shouldn’t do a too the death roll unless it’s one on one. So if I were to accept a too the death roll 2 on 1 it would still be first hits win. In which case I received 2 hits before you recieved 1. There is no round 3 and 4, you rolled all dice in round 2.
anchovy, looks like you missed my NCM change. there’s a map on pg17. no inf in smolensk, only one in arc.
I’m sure you’ll want to take smolensk.
Ok, what do you want me to do? It was an innocent error, and based on a call I’ve seen others on this board make (albeit with subs). Nonetheless the result seems clear. I’m not trying to pull a fast one. If you insist however, I’ll re-roll from scratch round by round.