1d1000<=1: 2; Hits: 0
1d1000<=1: 25; Hits: 0
M7574 & EM (axis) vs Anchovy & moulinex (allies) G40 alpha +2
-
geez…
att:
Rolls: 3@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 13@1: (6, 3, 1)1@3: (4)1@4: (6)def:
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (1, 4) -
att:
Rolls: 2@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 02@1: (3, 5)1@3: (4)1@4: (5)def:
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2) -
WTF!
att:
Rolls: 1@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@1: (5)1@3: (6)1@4: (2)def:
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2) -
Ger08
collect: 59ipc’s
NO’s:
10ipc’s
total: 69ipc’sone placement change: 2inf and 2mech switch places between WGer and Berlin
I don’t think I like this dicey.
-
Germany should have an extra 5 IPC for controlling Cau (No #3).
-
yay!
thanks. got a little bit angry over the vologda debacle. finished turn rather hastily.
I’ve got my avatar but the website won’t let me use it. I suppose photos are to complex or something.
-
quick german ncm change. map coming….
-
-
How does Anzac take Solomon when the dice showed Japan getting 2 hits to one, even though you really shouldn’t to the death dice unless it’s 1 against 1.
20@1: (3, 6, 6, 1, 3, 3, 2, 6, 1, 6, 1, 4, 6, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 1)
20@2: (1, 4, 6, 1, 5, 2, 4, 2, 3, 3, 1, 6, 3, 6, 1, 6, 3, 2, 5, 3)
Shouldn’t Solomon be empty but still under Japanese control?
-
I had to look at it close to count it but its correct. The way he rolled it may not be not forum-correct but I’m ok with it.
on the other hand I have a BIG problem with how well his inf have rolled on the defense vs me. :x
-
I had to look at it close to count it but its correct. The way he rolled it may not be not forum-correct but I’m ok with it.
on the other hand I have a BIG problem with how well his inf have rolled on the defense vs me. :x
You will have to elaborate, cause i’m not ok with it.
-
rnd 1 att:miss miss def:hit
rnd 2 att:miss def:miss
rnd 3 att:hit def:miss
rnd 4 att:miss def:hit but rnd 4 doesn’t happen because our inf is dead.again, it may not be the the official way to roll it but this ain’t no tournament.
-
Yes, what I was going to say, but my connection crapped out before I could.
-
R8
IPC=19
Purchases: 5 inf, 1 rtlCombat
kaz
1 inf samvol
2 inf tam
2 ftr, 1 tac ruskaz lwol.
vol
A: 2 inf, 2 ftr, 1 tac
Rolls: 2@1 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 22@1: (6, 6)2@3: (4, 2)1@4: (1)
D: 1 inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6) -
Sorry EM, I probably should have gone round by round, but I didn’t want to go through typing the same thing out a bunch of times. I wasn’t aware I was breaking forum etiquette, so I’ll go the carpal tunnel route next time. As for the explanation, M7574 had it right.
-
vol lwol.
NCM
see map.Place
5 inf, 1 rtl rusCollects
21BTW, French moves: 3 inf alex > egy; 1 inf cng > sud
-
Another suggestion is to roll the 2 inf separately, in future similar situations. For example, in that battle round 1 would look like:
Attacker: 2 inf
:bbb 10@1 10@1:
Defender: 1 inf
:bbb 10@2:Then you can clearly see which inf hits first.
-
rnd 1 att:miss miss def:hit
rnd 2 att:miss def:miss
rnd 3 att:hit def:miss
rnd 4 att:miss def:hit but rnd 4 doesn’t happen because our inf is dead.again, it may not be the the official way to roll it but this ain’t no tournament.
We both agree that rd1 was a miss on both parts as it was rolled properly.
Next roll was 20 against 20, this is a too the death roll, first hits win. Technically you shouldn’t do a too the death roll unless it’s one on one. So if I were to accept a too the death roll 2 on 1 it would still be first hits win. In which case I received 2 hits before you recieved 1. There is no round 3 and 4, you rolled all dice in round 2. -
anchovy, looks like you missed my NCM change. there’s a map on pg17. no inf in smolensk, only one in arc.
I’m sure you’ll want to take smolensk.
-
Ok, what do you want me to do? It was an innocent error, and based on a call I’ve seen others on this board make (albeit with subs). Nonetheless the result seems clear. I’m not trying to pull a fast one. If you insist however, I’ll re-roll from scratch round by round.