The Final Poll

As AP said, y’all already know my preferences, so I too will spare the lecture. I’ll just say I find it likely Bush will win, thanks to his stands on certain issues, and the general dislike of Kerry.

I believe Kerry will win. Undecideds break for the challenger when there is unrest/ dissatisfaction in the country.

Hilary will probablly run for VP. I don’t think the rednecks are ready to actually vote for a woman.
As far as women being able to lead, several countries have been run by very capable women. England and India just to name a couple. Women are perfectly capable of leading well. In some instances better. For instance, a woman is not considered weak just for changing her mind. ;)

it seems to me like people think whoever they like will win. im leaning towards Bush, but Kerry does have a chance, it all depends on ohio and florida.

Let us hope to God that the whole Florida fiasco does not take place again this year, no matter who wins. If I had to listen to Peter Jennings and Dan Rather one more time…. :evil:

You know, one thing that would almost make it worthwhile to see Kerry win (besides the humor that would follow, and the many opportunities for us pro-Bush people to smirk and say “I told you so”), would be if Kerry won the Electoral vote, but not the popular vote. When Gore won the popular vote, so many Democrats were screeching about how Bush didn’t really win; let’s see if they would do the same this time :lol:.

I am not a Democrat but I do hate Bush. All the same, I am pro ellectoral college either way.

I dont have a problem with the idea of a woman president. I have a problem with the idea of Hillary Clinton officially the president.

I also dont think a woman will be elected president any time soon (the next several elections) but it will happen eventually, and whenever it does, I will judge the woman as I would any man running (unless its Hillary)

but Kerry does have a chance, it all depends on ohio and florida.

It depends on Ohio or Florida. A Bush loss in either would probably mean the elelction.

Also, the Iowa Futures Market which allows people to trade stock in who they think will win has Kerry ahead. This is important b/c this exchange has accurately predicted the winners in previous elections. For those not familar its a project conducted out of the University of Iowa.

Anyway I think Kerry is going to do better than people think b/c of higher voter registration turnout. Of the states that are close as reported by MSN including Iowa, Minn, Wisc, Mich, Mo, Colo, Ari, Nevada, NMex, Wash, and Ore, I think Kerry will certainly win Iowa, Minn, Wisc, and Mich b/c of past history and higher voter reg and turnout. Mo had a history of voting democrat up until 2000, but Bush does have a lead there so I’m inclined to think he wins that one, along with WV, and Florida. Likewise I think Ore, Wash and Nevada are wins for Kerry for similar trends in previous years, and b/c high voter reg and turnout in Nevada probably means a Kerry win there. Colorado, NMex and Arizona have had similarly high voter registrations, but in the case of Colo and Arizona Bush won by so much in 2000 that I don’t know if that can be overcome, but I’ll give Kerry NMex.

I’m not as well versed in Eastern trends and politics so this is more of a guess, but b/c NH “lives free or dies” I think it will insist on being the Wildcard in NewEngland and got with Bush, but Kerry gets Maine. That leaves only Ohio and Pennsylvannia. Penn has a long history of voting Democrat, and Ohio of being republican. So here are my state by state predictions, and you can all laugh at me when I get many wrong.
This is just for fun, maybe somebody else will post theirs and we can have fun with it after Nov 2.

Wash-Kerry
Ore-Kerry
NV-Kerry
AZ-Bush
NMex-Kerry
Colo-Bush
Mo-Bush
Iowa-Kerry
Minn-Kerry
Wisc-Kerry
Mich-Kerry
Ohio-Kerry
WV-Bush
Penn-Kerry
Florida-Bush
Maine-Kerry
NH-Bush

So as I see it w/o Ohio Kerry has 265, Bush 253 so a Kerry win in any state like WV, Colo, Ark or Ohio and he wins.

But its not impossible that Kerry will get over 325 elect votes.

You forgot Illinois. Unless Prime Minister, god of all creation and his royal majesty Daley (ere I mean Mayor of Chicago) dies, he’ll engineer the election in the great state of Illinois to be for Kerry, that’s another 20-22 electoral votes.

(BTW, it’s amazing, but in every presidential election in Illinois when a Daley wasn’t sitting on the throne, the state has voted for the Republican….hmm, makes ya think! BTW, we are still the only state in the union with 100% turn out of deceased citizens at the ballot boxes!)

(BTW, it’s amazing, but in every presidential election in Illinois when a Daley wasn’t sitting on the throne, the state has voted for the Republican….hmm, makes ya think! BTW, we are still the only state in the union with 100% turn out of deceased citizens at the ballot boxes!)

Well but you have to ignore the elections from 80-88 b/c these were extremely lopsided in that in 84 Mondale only won 1 state. This doesn’t mean that Iowa, Ill, Wisc etc don’t lean left it means this one candidate was very weak.

You forgot Illinois. Unless Prime Minister, god of all creation and his royal majesty Daley (ere I mean Mayor of Chicago) dies, he’ll engineer the election in the great state of Illinois to be for Kerry, that’s another 20-22 electoral votes.

I ignored the races where the lead is supposedly safe. The only ones of those that are in doubt are Ark and Tenn, and I have a hard time believing Bush won’t win these as well. So I guess should Kerry win these you can count these against my score, but lets see how many of the 17 I listed I can get right.

BTW, we are still the only state in the union with 100% turn out of deceased citizens at the ballot boxes!)

Yes the democrats cheat in Illinois and the Republicans cheat in Florida, Quid pro quo!

You know Agent, you were making sense until you said:

the Republicans cheat in Florida

Give me a break. The Republicans did not cheat in Florida. If anything, the Dems did, what with all the recounts (notice, in every single recount, Bush still won!!), and the attempt to keep Katherine Harris (Secretary of State in Florida) from doing her job. Provide me with some actual evidence (not hearsay, mind you, evidence) that the Republicans “cheated” in Florida.

:roll: One would have thought things would be better this time. Nope. Florida had voting booths break down and the debates are gonna start again. Gees. It’s not even the regular election and they can’t handle it?!
Is anyone cheating? Probablly. What I find the most troubling is the people that threw out voter registrations for people that where not gonna vote for their candidate. I don’t care what side people like that are on. They are scum.

What I find the most troubling is the people that threw out voter registrations for people that where not gonna vote for their candidate. I don’t care what side people like that are on. They are scum.

Finally, Lizard; something we agree on ;) 8).

@Jennifer:

The only problem I can foresee with a female president would be how some foreign nations may view her, and in turn us. After all, there are some nations, whether right or wrong, that do not hold women in very high regard and do treat them as second rate citizens at best, cattle at worst.

As for if Hillary runs, I sure hope Lisa Madigan, Condoleeza Rice or some other strong woman runs against her if she does. I’d hate to see her get elected because of her genes. (Not to mention, Woman v Woman would mean a Woman President. smile)

BTW, I really wish President Bush would have selected a woman VP.

Philipines has a very strong female Prez and they get Terrorist threats and attacks and the like more often then we…

I doubt that has much to do with their President being female, though; probably has more to do with the fact that the Philippines have a much larger Muslim population than the U.S. does, and a larger percentage of those are likely to be the fanatics we’re fighting against.

Give me a break. The Republicans did not cheat in Florida. If anything, the Dems did, what with all the recounts (notice, in every single recount, Bush still won!!), and the attempt to keep Katherine Harris (Secretary of State in Florida) from doing her job. Provide me with some actual evidence (not hearsay, mind you, evidence) that the Republicans “cheated” in Florida.

Yeah right b/c its only the other guys that cheat. What party was Nixon again?

Yeah right b/c its only the other guys that cheat. What party was Nixon again?

Oh, that’s right, I forgot about Nixon’s infamous “Floridagate” scandal…. :roll:

What exactly does Nixon have to do with a bunch of the usual suspects throwing out military ballots, smearing a woman simply doing her job, and inventing such stupidities as “dimpled chads,” “hanging chads,” “pregnant chads,” “freckled chads,” “pimply chads,” and “Chadrach, Meshach, and Abednego.” Ok, I made up those last three, but the point stands. Oh, and let’s not forget that a New York Times article written after the whole business was over (I think about a year or so ago, I don’t know) said that Bush won the election any way you count (or dimple) it.

What exactly does Nixon have to do with a bunch of the usual suspects throwing out military ballots, smearing a woman simply doing her job, and inventing such stupidities as “dimpled chads,” “hanging chads,” “pregnant chads,” “freckled chads,” “pimply chads,” and “Chadrach, Meshach, and Abednego.”

Nothing except that I am quite sure the democrats are as guilty of improprieties in Illinois as the Republicans are in Florida. Quid pro quo. However its always a sign of partisan politics to see only the other side as guilty of this sort of thing. Clearly as Nixon proves this is not the case.

Nothing except that I am quite sure the democrats are as guilty of improprieties in Illinois as the Republicans are in Florida.

Ok, fair enough. Care to highlight what improprieties the Republicans were (or are) guilty of in Florida?

Point 1: The Phillipeans arn’t a world power that has a tendancy to try and shove their cultural and moral view points down the throats of sovereign nations like we do, though. I’d hesitate to put forward a theory, but, do you think their terrorist rate would drop significantly if they had a male president?

Point 2: Yes, anyone who discards a vote where the intent of the voter was plainly obvious, FOR ANY REASON, should be disenfranchised on the spot and permanently removed from any municiple, state or federal government position. Hanging chad, dimpled chad, whatever - you still know how they WANTED to vote.

Point 3: Wasn’t it President Clinton that held the absentee ballots from the military men and women over seas so long that there was no way they could get them back in time to be counted in the election? I’m sorry, but it’s my opinion that the only people on this country you DON’T want to get ticked off is the military! They have all the guns!

Point 4: We are still finding ballot boxes from Republican communities here in Chicago and the suburbs. (Daily Herald - Chicago - reported that they found 3 boxes in the Chicago River when they were checking fecal material levels. Of course, this being Daley’s country, the report was buried on page 28-32, somewhere in there. I want to say 29, I’ve got it in my garage. But the report did say that it held some ballots from the 2000 election (most had been destroyed by pollution, current and time.))

Point 5: Running against Reagan in the 80’s is sort of akin to running against FDR during WWII. You sorta only did it to prove that your party wasn’t dead, but you really didn’t expect to win anyway. wink That’s TOTALLY my perspective and is not based in ANY fact or rumored fact!

The one scary thing is the big cities, Demies are getting droves of ignorant to register , and obviously, they will vote Democrat, because they are ignorant.