@cdassak:
So if Russia takes Norway even the bmr can’t attack.
The battle is 3inf 2ftr 1arm vs 3inf 1ftr so the Russian can drop the Moscow ftr before killing the tank. It will die in Karelia on G1 anyway.
Even if Norway doesn’t change hands (but you do kill the German ftr) the UK bb will probably survive.
Now the dilemma is attack Norway, sacrifising 1ftr and 1arm, and abandon any ‘usual’ Russian opening to save the UK fleet or do nothing and let it die…
3 Inf, 1 Arm, 1 Fighter vs 3 Infantry, 1 Fighter:
Overall %*: A. survives: 60% D. survives: 34% No survivors:7%
- percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
Attacker results:
Probability % # units
1% 5: 3 Inf, 1 Arm, 1 Fig.
7% 4: 2 Inf, 1 Arm, 1 Fig.
16% 3: 1 Inf, 1 Arm, 1 Fig.
19% 2: 1 Arm, 1 Fig.
17% 1: 1 Fig.
40% 0: no units.
Defender results:
Probability % # units
1% 4: 3 Inf, 1 Fig.
6% 3: 2 Inf, 1 Fig.
12% 2: 1 Inf, 1 Fig.
15% 1: 1 Fig.
66% 0: no units.
But let’s say Germany got extremely good die rolls and Russia had to retreat the plane. It used 1 movement to get from Karelia to Finland/Norway so has 3 left. 1 to Karelia, 1 to West Russia, 1 to Caucasus or Russia.
So how, exactly, is Russia going to loose a fighter in this engagement? They loose the same 3 infantry they would loose anyway in any engagement with Germany, either offensively or defensively, the same Armor they probably would loose on a German counter attack and kill off a German fighter, deny a German assault on the British navy (and if you bid a second sub, odds are you’re going to try and do more naval damage on G1 then normal) and set up a method of destroying even more german units with England’s landings in Finland.