Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

MOVED: WANTED! ANZAC set - will trade US+UK+USSR 1940 Sets

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940

500

I

Imperious Leader '17 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10
last edited by

This topic has been moved to Axis & Allies Marketplace.

http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=20714.0
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0

Featured Topics

League rules idea: mulligans for patrons

Guadalcanal Tournament at Strategicon (Los Angeles) Feb. 17, 2024

T-shirts, Hats, and More

global 1940

175

anniversary

1914

1942 2nd ed

tips&tricks

bm3

video

axis & allies

Suggested Topics

F

Pacific 1940 US wartime economy clarification

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • FrankoG

7

1
Votes

7
Posts

159
Views

F

Thanks @Stucifer, @SuperbattleshipYamato
& @Krieghund. I suspected that was the case but was really hoping it wasn’t.
T

Can aircraft make noncombat move thru friendly neutral if land units move into it on the same turn?

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • Tank Buster

9

1
Votes

9
Posts

495
Views

A

@tank-buster said in Can aircraft make noncombat move thru friendly neutral if land units move into it on the same turn?:

I thought that might be the case but since aircraft could fly over an unfriendly neutral if they attacked it

Depending on what you mean this is or is not correct. When you say “fly over” if you mean they can fly into the unfriendly territory during the Combat Movement phase and attack it in the Combat phase and then in the Non-combat phase fly out then that is correct. If you mean some units attack an unfriendly neutral and other air units fly into and out of the unfriendly neutral during the Combat Movement phase to attack elsewhere that is not allowed if this is the first time the unfriendly neutral has been attacked.
S

Question about J1 and US

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • statspie

3

0
Votes

3
Posts

497
Views

S

Thank you for the clarification. :)
J

2nd Edition Pacific 1940 Anzac Cruiser's Name

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • John Brown

9

0
Votes

9
Posts

4.4k
Views

J

@CWO:

@John:

I think my first edition Anzac Cruiser is the Kent Class and the other is the County Class for the second edition. Is this what you were saying?

That’s the most likely hypothesis, using the nomenclature of the rulebooks.Â

Ok, cool, so it is the British Class Cruiser. Good to know!

Thanks again! :-D
I

MOVED: Making Airbases Required for Flight/Landing

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • Imperious Leader

1

0
Votes

1
Posts

539
Views

I

This topic has been moved to House Rules.

http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=17663.0
W

Convoy SZ adjacent two a Japanese & UK territory?

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • Woodstock

4

0
Votes

4
Posts

974
Views

K

Since they happen on two different turns, they can do both.
M

Starting ipc's for UK

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • miragehunter

8

0
Votes

8
Posts

1.2k
Views

M

Thanks guys! I appreciate it. Lol i do feel like a chimp now! Lol!
D

Pacific 1940 review copy has arrived

Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
• • • djensen

139

0
Votes

139
Posts

25.4k
Views

D

If you can wait until tomorrow, I’ll explain it all in my next article about the rules.

39

Online

17.4k

Users

39.9k

Topics

1.7m

Posts