Never mind on my earlier post about putting an AB in Normandy is not all that helpful i realized. I was reading in another post about an AB strategy for alpha +.2 and it doesn’t seem helpful in that respect as well. Sorry just realized that forgot write down Normandy. Doesn’t help when you think faster than you type.

Will an AB in Normandy be effective strategy sealion in oob as well? Never really thought of that one before until reading recent posts. Just to bad can’t use scramble.

I soooo want to do a roadie to just see your awesome table!!!  Nice job!

Thanks for all the feed back guys.  Krieghund, you agreed that you would rather see a more progessive style approach.  Could you elaborate on this idea that you have.  I’m really trying to get my gaming group to go with tech.  But in a manner that would be better suited for the global edition since the optional rule doesn’t seam right.  Look forward to your response.  Anyone else who has an adaptation to implement tech in this fashion.  Please put in your two cents.

I just played my first game and it was a truly epic experience.  My question is about tech.  What does the community think about tech.  My group feels it dilutes the strategic value of the game and makes it more based on luck.  My personal feelings are.  I like tech.  It adds another element to the game.  But I’m sure the purists feel that it diminishes the game (which is fine cause we all have our opinions).  I do realize its an optional rule.  Which I find kinda odd considering in past games it was not an optional rule.  Krieghund please chime in.  I would love to hear your take on the topic.  Thanks again for your feed back.  Happy gaming!  :-D

I figured it was time that I’ve revived the thread.  Just to update the thread.  I have copies AAR, AA spring 42, AAP40, and also will getting a copy of AAE40 as well.  Anyone in the Rochester area or some of the finger lakes area interested in gaming please give me a reply.  Thanks again and happy gaming! :)

I love all this discussion on the cruisers.  I would also agree on the historically accurate changes for the cruisers as well.  Being that cruisers could go 3 spaces at all times (so does that mean that cruisers would also gain the extra movement space from a NB?)  Plus I think that one round of AA fire is appropriate as well.  I pose a question to Kreighund.  Was this discussed as well in the development phase of the game?  Btw thanks for all your hard work that you’ve put in the game and for answering your questions.  I can’t wait to get my copy at the store. :)  Good gaming to all!

@Hawk2440:

At the collect income phase of the turn America jumps up 40 IPCs and enters the war I like to play this song  :-D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCqZsFM7Sg8

Very nice and appropriate.  8-)

Thank you Krieg for clarifying that for me.  :-)

Thanks Krieghund.  But if you were to land in the territory adjacent from the sea zone that you started from wouldn’t that be two movement?  Or is that considered one movement?  If it was just a carrier that you landed on in the adjacent sea zone that would be one movement.