The ‘Sub Stall’ is an old rule, that’s about transports not being able to load from a seazone that has “submerged” submarines in it.
Placing existing fighters on new bought aircraft carrier ?
-
Page 25 of the rulebook says that you may not place newly purchased fighters directly on aircraft carriers. But can you place existing fighters located at an industrial complex on a newly bought aircraft carrier (like in other A&A games) ?
-
@cojoh I’m not sure what you are referencing but page 23 of Europe and 22 of the Pacific book state the following:
“You can place fighters and tactical bombers into territories
containing an industrial complex controlled by your power
from the start of your turn, or on an aircraft carrier owned
by your power in a sea zone (even a hostile one) adjacent
to a territory with such an industrial complex. The aircraft
carrier can be either a new one currently being mobilized,
or an existing one already in place. You can’t place a new
fighter or tactical bomber on a carrier owned by a friendly
power.”The only restriction is that new air can’t be placed on an allied carrier.
-
I just realized this might be a reference to an older version of pacific. I’m referencing the most recent 1940 version.
-
-
@farmboy indeed
-
@cojoh said in Placing existing fighters on new bought aircraft carrier ?:
Page 25 of the rulebook says that you may not place newly purchased fighters directly on aircraft carriers. But can you place existing fighters located at an industrial complex on a newly bought aircraft carrier (like in other A&A games) ?
You may not.
-
@krieghund ok, Tks